Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1965 Sep 1;26(3):693–706. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.3.693

STUDIES ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE BRUSH BORDER IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL CELLS

II. Fine Structure of Fractions of Tris-Disrupted Hamster Brush Borders

Jane Overton 1, Alexander Eichholz 1, Robert K Crane 1
PMCID: PMC2106780  PMID: 19866672

Abstract

Two of the fractions obtained by density gradient centrifugation of Tris-disrupted brush borders from hamster intestinal mucosa have been identified as the microvillus cores and their surrounding membranous coats, respectively. This identification has the following morphological basis. In shadowed preparations one fraction (cores) appears as rounded, compact rods, and the other fraction (coats) appears as flattened sheets. Both rods and sheets have dimensions appropriate to the identities assigned to them. In addition, negative staining shows that the rods are composed of aligned particles of roughly 60 A, consistent with the appearance of the core in tissue section, where 60-A fibrils are characteristic. The sheets are covered by non-aligned particles of approximately the same size. Sectioned preparations show that the core fraction contains predominantly fibrous material with some membranous contamination and that the coat fraction is apparently composed exclusively of elongated sacs with a unit membrane structure. Some details of the structure of the core are evident in cases where the compact rod appears to be loosened, revealing a doubled strand. The strand is approximately 350 A wide; the compact rod is roughly twice this width. With negative staining the strand shows a dense central region. The morphological identification presented here is consistent with the distribution of enzymic activity among the density gradient fractions described in the preceding paper.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRENNER S., HORNE R. W. A negative staining method for high resolution electron microscopy of viruses. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1959 Jul;34:103–110. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(59)90237-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROWN A. L., Jr Microvilli of the human jejunal epithelial cell. J Cell Biol. 1962 Mar;12:623–627. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.3.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FERNANDEZ MORAN H. NEW APPROACHES IN CORRELATIVE STUDIES OF BIOLOGICAL ULTRASTRUCTURE BY HIGH-RESOLUTION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J R Microsc Soc. 1964 Jun;83:183–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HANSSEN O. E., HERMAN L. The presence of an axial structure in the microvillus of the mouse convoluted proximal tubular cell. Lab Invest. 1962 Aug;11:610–616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOLT J. H., MILLER D. The localization of phosphomonoesterase and aminopeptidase in brush borders isolated from intestinal epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962 Apr 9;58:239–243. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(62)91004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LOWY J., HANSON J. STRUCTURE OF BACTERIAL FLAGELLA. Nature. 1964 May 9;202:538–540. doi: 10.1038/202538a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MILLER D., CRANE R. K. A procedure for the isolation of the epithelial brush border membrane of hamster small intestine. Anal Biochem. 1961 Jun;2:284–286. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(61)80014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MILLER D., CRANE R. K. The digestive function of the epithelium of the small intestine. II. Localization of disaccharide hydrolysis in the isolated brush border portion of intestinal epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Sep 16;52:293–298. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90678-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MILLINGTON P. F., FINEAN J. B. Electron microscope studies of the structure of the microvilli on principal epithelial cells of rat jejunum after treatment in hypo- and hypertonic saline. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jul;14:125–139. doi: 10.1083/jcb.14.1.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. OVERTON J., SHOUP J. FINE STRUCTURE OF CELL SURFACE SPECIALIZATIONS IN THE MATURING DUODENAL MUCOSA OF THE CHICK. J Cell Biol. 1964 Apr;21:75–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PALAY S. L., KARLIN L. J. An electron microscopic study of the intestinal villus. I. The fasting animal. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 May 25;5(3):363–372. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.3.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SABATINI D. D., BENSCH K., BARRNETT R. J. Cytochemistry and electron microscopy. The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:19–58. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SHELDON H., ZETTERQVIST H., BRANDES D. Histochemical reactions for electron microscopy: acid phosphatase. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Dec;9(3):592–596. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. STOECKENIUS W. Some observations on negatively stained mitochondria. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:443–454. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. TAYLOR A. C., ROBBINS E. Observations on microextensions from the surface of isolated vertebrate cells. Dev Biol. 1963 Mar;6:660–673. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(63)90150-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WATSON M. L. Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Jul 25;4(4):475–478. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.4.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES