Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1965 Oct 1;27(1):107–117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.27.1.107

ULTRASTRUCTURE AND PERMEABILITY OF NUCLEAR MEMBRANES

Joseph Wiener 1, David Spiro 1, Werner R Loewenstein 1
PMCID: PMC2106812  PMID: 5892850

Abstract

The fine structures of nuclear envelopes known to have different permeability properties were compared. Membranes of salivary gland cell nuclei of Drosophila (third instar) and Chironomus (prepupae), which are strong barriers to ion diffusion, and membranes of oocyte nuclei (germinal vesicle) of Xenopus and Triturus, which are much more ion-permeable, show no essential difference in size, frequency, and distribution of their membrane gaps ("pores") which could account for the marked disparities in membrane permeability. The gaps are occupied by diffuse electron-opaque material with occasional central regions of strong opacity. This material may possibly account for the high diffusion resistance of Drosophila and Chironomus nuclear envelopes, where the resistance is far too great to allow free diffusion through the gaps. But material of this kind is also present in the more permeable nuclear envelopes of Xenopus and Triturus oocytes, and there are no convincing structural differences discernible with the techniques employed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AFZELIUS B. A. The ultrastructure of the nuclear membrane of the sea urchin oocyte as studied with the electron microscope. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Feb;8(1):147–158. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAHR G. F., BEERMANN W. The fine structure of the nuclear membrane in the larval salivary gland and midgut of Chironomus. Exp Cell Res. 1954 May;6(2):519–522. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90200-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CALLAN H. G., TOMLIN S. G. Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1950 Oct 13;137(888):367–378. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1950.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FELDHERR C. M. BINDING WITHIN THE NUCLEAR ANNULI AND ITS POSSIBLE EFFECT ON NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC EXCHANGES. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jan;20:188–192. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GALL J. G. Observations on the nuclear membrane with the electron microscope. Exp Cell Res. 1954 Aug;7(1):197–200. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GALL J. G. The nuclear envelope after KMnO4 fixation. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Aug;6(1):115–118. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GAY H. Chromosome-nuclear membrane-cytoplasmic interrelations in Drosophila. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):407–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KANNO Y., LOEWENSTEIN W. R. A STUDY OF THE NUCLEUS AND CELL MEMBRANES OF OOCYTES WITH AN INTRA-CELLULAR ELECTRODE. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Jun;31:149–166. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KARNOVSKY M. J. Simple methods for "staining with lead" at high pH in electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:729–732. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KAUTZ J., DE MARSH Q. B. Fine structure of the nuclear membrane in cells from the chick embryo: on the nature of the socalled "pores" in the nuclear membrane. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Apr;8(2):394–396. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90149-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kanno Y., Ashman R. F., Loewenstein W. R. Nucleus and cell membrane conductance in marine oocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Aug;39(1):184–189. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LOEWENSTEIN W. R., KANNO Y. SOME ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF A NUCLEAR MEMBRANE EXAMINED WITH A MICROELECTRODE. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jul;46:1123–1140. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.6.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LOEWENSTEIN W. R., KANNO Y. STUDIES ON AN EPITHELIAL (GLAND) CELL JUNCTION. I. MODIFICATIONS OF SURFACE MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Sep;22:565–586. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MAGGIO R., SIEKEVITZ P., PALADE G. E. STUDIES ON ISOLATED NUCLEI. I. ISOLATION AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF A NUCLEAR FRACTION FROM GUINEA PIG LIVER. J Cell Biol. 1963 Aug;18:267–291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.18.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MERRIAM R. W. On the fine structure and composition of the nuclear envelope. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:559–570. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MERRIAM R. W. Some dynamic aspects of the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jan;12:79–90. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SABATINI D. D., BENSCH K., BARRNETT R. J. Cytochemistry and electron microscopy. The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:19–58. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WATSON M. L. Further observations on the nuclear envelope of the animal cell. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Oct;6:147–156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WATSON M. L. The nuclear envelope; its structure and relation to cytoplasmic membranes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1955 May 25;1(3):257–270. doi: 10.1083/jcb.1.3.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WISCHNITZER S. An electron microscope study of the nuclear envelope of amphibian oocytes. J Ultrastruct Res. 1958 Apr;1(3):201–222. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(58)80001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES