Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1963 Nov 1;19(2):369–390. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.2.369

FILAMENT LENGTHS IN STRIATED MUSCLE

Sally G Page 1, H E Huxley 1
PMCID: PMC2106870  PMID: 14086763

Abstract

Filament lengths in resting and excited frog muscles have been measured in the electron microscope, and investigations made of the changes in length that are found under different conditions, to distinguish between those changes which arise during preparation and the actual differences in the living muscles. It is concluded that all the measured differences in filament length are caused by the preparative procedures in ways that can be simply accounted for, and that the filament lengths are the same in both resting and excited muscles at all sarcomere lengths greater than 2.1 µ, viz., A filaments, 1.6 µ; I filaments, 2.05 µ. The fine periodicity visible along the I filaments also has been measured in frog, toad, and rabbit muscles and found to be 406 A.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CARLSEN F., KNAPPEIS G. G., BUCHTHAL F. Ultrastructure of the resting and contracted striated muscle fiber at different degrees of stretch. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Oct;11:95–117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COHEN C., HANSON J. An X-ray diffraction study of F-actin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1956 Jul;21(1):177–178. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(56)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HANSON J., HUXLEY H. E. Structural basis of the cross-striations in muscle. Nature. 1953 Sep 19;172(4377):530–532. doi: 10.1038/172530b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUXLEY A. F., NIEDERGERKE R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):971–973. doi: 10.1038/173971a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HUXLEY A. F., PEACHEY L. D. The maximum length for contraction in vertebrate straiated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:150–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HUXLEY H., HANSON J. Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):973–976. doi: 10.1038/173973a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KNAPPEIS G. G., CARLSEN F. The ultrastructure of the Z disc in skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1962 May;13:323–335. doi: 10.1083/jcb.13.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PALADE G. E. A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J Exp Med. 1952 Mar;95(3):285–298. doi: 10.1084/jem.95.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PERRY S. V., CORSI A. Extraction of proteins other than myosin from the isolated rabbit myofibril. Biochem J. 1958 Jan;68(1):5–12. doi: 10.1042/bj0680005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SELBY C. C., BEAR R. S. The structure of actin-rich filaments of muscles according to x-ray diffraction. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jan 25;2(1):71–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES