Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1966 Jan 1;28(1):21–31. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.1.21

THE PERMEABILITY OF RAT TRANSITIONAL EPITHELIUM

Keratinization and the Barrier to Water

R M Hicks 1
PMCID: PMC2106894  PMID: 5901498

Abstract

Permeability barriers must exist in transitional epithelium to prevent the free flow of water from underlying blood capillaries through the epithelium into the hypertonic urine, and such a barrier has now been demonstrated in isolated bladders. This barrier is passive in function and can be destroyed by damaging the luminal surface of the transitional epithelium with sodium hydroxide and 8 M urea solutions, by digesting it with trypsin, lecithinase C, and lecithinase D, or by treating it with lipid solvents such as Triton x 100 and saponin. From this it is concluded that the barrier depends on the integrity of lipoprotein cell membranes. The barrier function is also destroyed by sodium thioglycollate solutions, and electron microscope investigations show that sodium thioglycollate damages the thick asymmetric membrane which limits the luminal face of the superficial squamous cell. Cytochemical staining shows the epithelium to contain disulfide and thiol groups and to have a concentration of these groups at the luminal margin of the superficial cells. It thus appears that the permeability barrier also depends on the presence of disulfide bridges in the epithelium, and it is presumed that these links are located in keratin. Because of the effect of thioglycollates, both on the barrier function and on the morphology of the membrane, it is suggested that keratin may be incorporated in the thick barrier membrane. It is proposed that the cells lining the urinary bladder and ureters should be regarded as a keratinizing epitheluim.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BANGHAM A. D., HORNE R. W., GLAUERT A. M., DINGLE J. T., LUCY J. A. Action of saponin on biological cell membranes. Nature. 1962 Dec 8;196:952–955. doi: 10.1038/196952a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARRNETT R. J., SELIGMAN A. M. Demonstration of protein-bound sulfhydryl and disulfide groups by two new histochemical methods. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1952 Aug;13(1):215–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CAPURRO P., ANGRIST A., BLACK J., MOUMGIS B. Studies in squamous metaplasia in rat bladder. I. Effects of hypovitaminosis A, foreign bodies, and methylcholanthrene. Cancer Res. 1960 May;20:563–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hicks R. M. The fine structure of the transitional epithelium of rat ureter. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jul;26(1):25–48. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MATOLTSY A. G., PARAKKAL P. F. MEMBRANE-COATING GRANULES OF KERATINIZING EPITHELIA. J Cell Biol. 1965 Feb;24:297–307. doi: 10.1083/jcb.24.2.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ROE F. J. AN ILLUSTRATED CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROLIFERATIVE AND NEOPLASTIC CHANGES IN MOUSE BLADDER EPITHELIUM IN RESPONSE TO PROLONGED IRRITATION. Br J Urol. 1964 Jun;36:238–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1964.tb09506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WATSON M. L. Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Jul 25;4(4):475–478. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.4.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES