Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1966 Sep 1;30(3):579–600. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.3.579

FINE STRUCTURE OF THE HUMAN OVUM IN THE PRONUCLEAR STAGE

Luciano Zamboni 1, Daniel R Mishell Jr 1, James H Bell 1, Manuel Baca 1
PMCID: PMC2107024  PMID: 6008199

Abstract

A penetrated ovum was recovered from the oviduct of a 33 year old surgical patient who had had sexual intercourse 26 hr before the operation. The ovum was in the pronuclear stage. The ooplasmic organelles were mainly represented by mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum components, and Golgi elements. Small vesicles were found in the space between the two sheets of the pronuclear envelope. These vesicles appeared to be morphologically similar to the ER vesicles in the ooplasm and were considered to be involved in pronuclear development. Numerous annulate lamellae were seen in the ooplasm as well as in the pronuclei. Ooplasmic crystalloids were also observed. These were thought to represent cytoplasmic yolk. Remnants of the penetrating spermatozoon were found in close relation to one of the pronuclei. The fine structure of the first and second polar body is also described. The nuclear complement of the first polar body consisted of isolated chromosomes, whereas the second polar body contained a membrane-bounded nucleus. In consideration of the possibility that polar body fertilization may take place, these differences in nuclear organization could be of importance. Other recognizable differences between the two polar bodies were presence of dense cortical granules and microvilli in the first polar body, and absence of these structures in the second. These dissimilarities were considered to be related to the organization of the egg cytoplasm at the time of polar body separation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADAMS E. C., HERTIG A. T. STUDIES ON GUINEA PIG OOCYTES. I. ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CYTOPLASMIC ORGANELLES IN OOCYTES OF PRIMORDIAL AND PRIMARY FOLLICLES. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:397–427. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSON E., BEAMS H. W. Cytological observations on the fine structure of the guinea pig ovary with special reference to the oogonium, primary oocyte and associated follicle cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1960 Jun;3:432–446. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(60)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. AUSTIN C. R. Cortical granules in hamster eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1956 Apr;10(2):533–540. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(56)90025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BJORKMAN N. A study of the ultrastructure of the granulosa cells of the rat ovary. Acta Anat (Basel) 1962;51:125–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DALCQ A. M. Sur la prévalence du pronucléus mâle chez le rat. Arch Anat Histol Embryol. 1954;37(4-8):61–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickmann Z., Chewe T. H., Bonney W. A., Jr, Noyes R. W. The human egg in the pronuclear stage. Anat Rec. 1965 Jul;152(3):293–302. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091520309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FAWCETT D. W. Observations on the cytology and electron microscopy of hepatic cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1955 Apr;15(5 Suppl):1475–1503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fawcett D. W. The anatomy of the mammalian spermatozoon with particular reference to the guinea pig. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1965 Jul 30;67(3):279–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00339376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HADEK R., SWIFT H. Nuclear extrusion and intracisternal inclusions in the rabbit blastocyst. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jun;13:445–451. doi: 10.1083/jcb.13.3.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HADEK R. Submicroscopic study on the cortical granules in the rabbit ovum. J Ultrastruct Res. 1963 Feb;8:170–175. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(63)80028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HSU W. S. The nuclear envelope in the developing oocytes of the tunicate, boltenia villosa. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1963;58:660–678. doi: 10.1007/BF00410655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hope J. The fine structure of the developing follicle of the rhesus ovary. J Ultrastruct Res. 1965 Jun;12(5):592–610. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(65)80050-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KARNOVSKY M. J. Simple methods for "staining with lead" at high pH in electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:729–732. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KESSEL R. G., BEAMS H. W. NUCLEOLAR EXTRUSION IN OOCYTES OF THYONE BRIAREUS. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Dec;32:612–615. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KESSEL R. G. ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDIES ON OOCYTES AND ECHINODERM, THYONE BRIAREUS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ORIGIN AND STRUCTURE OF THE ANNULATE LAMELLAE. J Ultrastruct Res. 1964 Jun;10:498–514. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(64)80025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KESSEL R. G. ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDIES ON THE ORIGIN OF ANNULATE LAMELLAE IN OOCYTES OF NECTURUS. J Cell Biol. 1963 Nov;19:391–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.2.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. KESSEL R. G. INTRANUCLEAR ANNULATE LAMELLAE IN OOCYTES OF THE TUNICATE, STYELA PARTITA. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1964 Jun 12;63:37–51. doi: 10.1007/BF00338808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KHVATOV B. P. Novye dannye po oplodotvoreniiu u cheloveka. Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol. 1959 Mar;36(3):42–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MERRIAM R. W. The origin and fate of annulate lamellae in maturing sand dollar eggs. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Jan 25;5(1):117–122. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MOSES M. J. Chromosomal structures in crayfish spermatocytes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Mar 25;2(2):215–218. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.2.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MOSES M. J. The relation between the axial complex of meiotic prophase chromosomes and chromosome pairing in a salamander (Plethodon cinereus). J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Sep 25;4(5):633–638. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.5.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. NEBEL B. R., HACKETT E. M. Synaptinemal complexes in primary spermatocytes of the mouse: the effect of elevated temperature and some observations on the structure of these complexes in control material. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1961;55:556–565. doi: 10.1007/BF00325417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. ODOR D. L., BLANDAU R. J. Observations on fertilization and the first segmentation division in rat ova. Am J Anat. 1951 Jul;89(1):29–61. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000890103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. ODOR D. L. Electron microscopic studies on ovarian oocytes and unfertilized tubal ova in the rat. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jun;7:567–574. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.3.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. ODOR D. L. THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF UNILAMINAR FOLLICLES OF THE HAMSTER OVARY. Am J Anat. 1965 May;116:493–521. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001160304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. SOTELO J. R., PORTER K. R. An electron microscope study of the rat ovum. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Mar 25;5(2):327–342. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SWIFT H. The fine structure of annulate lamellae. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):415–418. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. SZOLLOSI D. G., RIS H. Observations on sperm penetration in the rat. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Jun;10:275–283. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Szollosi D. Extrusion of nucleoli from pronuclei of the rat. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3):545–562. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Szollosi D. The fate of sperm middle-piece mitochondria in the rat egg. J Exp Zool. 1965 Aug;159(3):367–377. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401590309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. WALLACE R. A. STUDIES ON AMPHIBIAN YOLK. IV. AN ANALYSIS OF THE MAIN-BODY COMPONENT OF YOLK PLATELETS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Aug 13;74:505–518. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(63)91393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. WARD R. T. The origin of protein and fatty yolk in Rana pipiens. II. Electron microscopical and cytochemical observations of young and mature oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1962 Aug;14:309–341. doi: 10.1083/jcb.14.2.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. WARTENBERG H., STEGNER H. E. [On the electron microscopic fine structure of the human ovarian egg]. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1960;52:450–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. ZAMBONI L., HONGSANAND C., MASTROIANNI L., Jr INFLUENCE OF TUBAL SECRETIONS ON RABBIT TUBAL OVA. Fertil Steril. 1965 Mar-Apr;16:177–184. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)35524-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES