Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1967 Sep 1;34(3):859–883. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.3.859

ULTRASTRUCTURE AND BIREFRINGENCE OF THE ISOLATED MITOTIC APPARATUS OF MARINE EGGS

Lionel I Rebhun 1, Greta Sander 1
PMCID: PMC2107180  PMID: 6057812

Abstract

Isolated mitotic apparatuses (MA) of clam and sea urchin eggs were investigated by polarizing and electron microscopy. Examination of fixed MA in oils of different refractive index revealed that at least 90% of the retardation of isolated MA is due to positive, form birefringence, the remaining retardation deriving from positive, intrinsic birefringence. Electron micrographs reveal the isolated MA to be composed of microtubules, ribosome-like particles, and a variety of vesicles. In the clam MA the number of vesicles and ribosome-like particles relative to the number of microtubules is much lower than in the sea urchin MA. In clam MA this allows form and intrinsic birefringence to be related directly to microtubules. The relation of birefringence to microtubules in isolated sea urchin MA is more complex since ribosome-like particles adhere to microtubules, are oriented by them, and are likely to contribute to the form birefringence of the isolated MA. However, comparison of values of retardation for clam and sea urchin MA, indicates that the major part of the birefringence in sea urchin MA is also due to microtubules. The interpretation of the structures giving rise to birefringence in the MA of the living cells is likely to be even more complex since masking substances, compression, or tension on the living MA may alter the magnitude or sign of the birefringence.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALLEN R. D., NAKAJIMA H. TWO-EXPOSURE, FILM DENSITOMETRIC METHOD MEASURING PHASE RETARDATIONS DUE TO WEAK BIREFRINGENCE IN FIBRILLAR OR MEMBRANOUS CELL CONSTITUENTS. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Jan;37:230–249. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90172-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajer A., Allen R. D. Structure and organization of the living mitotic spindle of Haemanthus endosperm. Science. 1966 Feb 4;151(3710):572–574. doi: 10.1126/science.151.3710.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behnke O., Forer A. Some aspects of microtubules in spermatocyte meiosis in a crane fly (Nephrotoma suturalis Loew): intranuclear and intrachromosomal microtubules. C R Trav Lab Carlsberg. 1966;35(19):437–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassim J. Y., Taylor E. W. Intrinsic birefringence of poly-gamma-benzyl-L-glutamate, a helical polypeptide, and the theory of birefringence. Biophys J. 1965 Jul;5(4):531–552. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(65)86733-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forer A. Characterization of the mitotic traction system, and evidence that birefringent spindle fibers neither produce nor transmit force for chromosome movement. Chromosoma. 1966;19(1):44–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00332793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HARRIS P. Some structural and functional aspects of the mitotic apparatus in sea urchin embryos. J Cell Biol. 1962 Sep;14:475–487. doi: 10.1083/jcb.14.3.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KANE R. E. THE MITOTIC APPARATUS. PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL FACTORS CONTROLLING STABILITY. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:144. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KANE R. E. The mitotic apparatus. Fine structure of the isolated unit. J Cell Biol. 1962 Nov;15:279–287. doi: 10.1083/jcb.15.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KANE R. E. The mitotic apparatus: isolation by controlled pH. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jan;12:47–55. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kane R. E., Forer A. The mitotic apparatus. Structural changes after isolation. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):31–39. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kane R. E. The mitotic apparatus. Identification of the major soluble component of the glycol-isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Feb;32(2):243–253. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MAZIA D., MITCHISON J. M., MEDINA H., HARRIS P. The direct isolation of the mitotic apparatus. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Aug;10:467–474. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.4.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazia D., Dan K. The Isolation and Biochemical Characterization of the Mitotic Apparatus of Dividing Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1952 Sep;38(9):826–838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.38.9.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. REBHUN L. I., SHARPLESS T. K. ISOLATION OF SPINDLES FROM THE SURF CLAM SPISULA SOLIDISSIMA. J Cell Biol. 1964 Aug;22:488–491. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. ROBBINS E., GONATAS N. K. THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF A MAMMALIAN CELL DURING THE MITOTIC CYCLE. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:429–463. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. RUSTAD R. C. An interference microscopical and cytochemical analysis of local mass changes in the mitotic apparatus during mitosis. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Mar;16(3):575–583. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rebhun L. I. Structural aspects of saltatory particle movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):223–239. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.6.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Roth L. E., Wilson H. J., Chakraborty J. Anaphase structure in mitotic cells typified by spindle elongation. J Ultrastruct Res. 1966 Mar;14(5):460–483. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(66)80076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. STEMPAK J. G., WARD R. T. AN IMPROVED STAINING METHOD FOR ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Sep;22:697–701. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.3.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sakai H. Studies on sulfhydryl groups during cell division of sea-urchin eggs. 8. Some properties of mitotic apparatus proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Jan 4;112(1):132–145. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6585(96)90015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stephens R. E. The mitotic apparatus. Physical chemical characterization of the 22S protein component and its subunits. J Cell Biol. 1967 Feb;32(2):255–275. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tilney L. G., Porter K. R. Studies on microtubules in Heliozoa. I. The fine structure of Actinosphaerium nucleofilum (Barrett), with particular reference to the axial rod structure. Protoplasma. 1965;60(4):317–344. doi: 10.1007/BF01247886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES