Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1967 Mar 1;32(3):557–575. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.3.557

AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY OF MYOFIBRIL FORMATION IN EMBRYONIC CHICK SKELETAL MUSCLE

Donald A Fischman 1
PMCID: PMC2107275  PMID: 6034479

Abstract

The formation of myofibrils in the developing leg muscle of the 12-day chick embryo was studied by electron microscopy. Myofilaments of two varieties, thick (160–170 A in diameter) and thin (60–70 A in diameter), which have been designated myosin and actin filaments, respectively, on the basis of their similarity to natural and synthetic myosin and actin filaments, appear in the cytoplasm of developing muscle cells. There is a greater than 7:1 ratio of thin to thick filaments in these young myofibers. The free myofilaments become aligned in the long axis of the cells, predominantly in subsarcolemmal locations, and aggregate into hexagonally packed arrays of filaments. The presence of Z band material or M band cross-bridges do not appear to be essential for the formation or spacing of these aggregates of filaments. Formation of the Z band lattices occurs coincidentally with the back-to-back apposition of thin filaments. An hypothesis concerning myofibril growth, based on the self-assembly characteristics of the filaments, is presented.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALLBROOK D. An electron microscopic study of regenerating skeletal muscle. J Anat. 1962 Apr;96:137–152. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ALLEN E. R., PEPE F. A. ULTRASTRUCTURE OF DEVELOPING MUSCLE CELLS IN THE CHICK EMBRYO. Am J Anat. 1965 Jan;116:115–147. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001160107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. AUBER J. SUR LE M'ECANISME DE LA FORMATION DES FILAMENTS PRIMAIRES AU COURS DE L'ACCROISSEMENT DES MYOFIBRILLES CHEZ CALLIPHORA ERYTHROCEPHALA (MG.) (INSECTE DIPT'ERE) C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1965 Jan 11;260:668–670. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BERGMAN R. A. Observations on the morphogenesis of rat skeletal muscle. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1962 Apr;110:187–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BREUER C. B., DAVIES M. C., FLORINI J. R. AMINO ACID INCORPORATION INTO PROTEIN BY CELL-FREE PREPARATIONS FROM RAT SKELETAL MUSCLE. II. PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF MUSCLE RIBOSOMES AND POLYRIBOSOMES. Biochemistry. 1964 Nov;3:1713–1719. doi: 10.1021/bi00899a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CAPERS C. R. Multinucleation of skeletal muscle in vitro. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jun;7:559–566. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CASPAR D. L., KLUG A. Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1962;27:1–24. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1962.027.001.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CEDERGREN B., HARARY I. IN VITRO STUDIES ON SINGLE BEATING RAT HEART CELLS. VI. ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDIES OF SINGLE CELLS. J Ultrastruct Res. 1964 Dec;11:428–442. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(64)80074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen C., Longley W. Tropomyosin paracrystals formed by divalent cations. Science. 1966 May 6;152(3723):794–796. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3723.794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FRANZINI-ARMSTRONG C., PORTER K. R. SARCOLEMMAL INVAGINATIONS CONSTITUTING THE T SYSTEM IN FISH MUSCLE FIBERS. J Cell Biol. 1964 Sep;22:675–696. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.3.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GROSS J. The behavior of collagen units as a model in morphogenesis. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):261–274. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HANSON J., HUXLEY H. E. Quantitative studies on the structure of cross-striated myofibrils. II. Investigations by biochemical techniques. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Feb;23(2):250–260. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90326-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HANSON J., HUXLEY H. E. Structural basis of the cross-striations in muscle. Nature. 1953 Sep 19;172(4377):530–532. doi: 10.1038/172530b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HAY E. D. The fine structure of differentiating muscle in the salamander tail. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1963;59:6–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00321005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HERRMANN H. Studies of muscle development. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1952 Aug 8;55(2):99–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1952.tb26525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HIGHBERGER J. H., GROSS J., SCHMITT F. O. The interaction of mucoprotein with soluble collagen; an electron microscope study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1951 May;37(5):286–291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.37.5.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HOLTZER H., MARSHALL J. M., Jr, FINCK H. An analysis of myogenesis by the use of fluorescent antimyosin. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Sep 25;3(5):705–724. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.5.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HUXLEY H., HANSON J. Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):973–976. doi: 10.1038/173973a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KNAPPEIS G. G., CARLSEN F. The ultrastructure of the Z disc in skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1962 May;13:323–335. doi: 10.1083/jcb.13.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. KONIGSBERG I. R. Clonal analysis of myogenesis. Science. 1963 Jun 21;140(3573):1273–1284. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3573.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. KONIGSBERG I. R., MCELVAIN N., TOOTLE M., HERRMANN H. The dissociability of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis from the development of multinuclearity of muscle cells in culture. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Oct;8:333–343. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.2.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. LASH J. W., HOLTZER H., SWIFT H. Regeneration of mature skeletal muscle. Anat Rec. 1957 Aug;128(4):679–697. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091280404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. MARTONOSI A. Studies on actin. VII. Ultracentrifugal analysis of partially polymerized actin solutions. J Biol Chem. 1962 Sep;237:2795–2803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. OGAWA Y. Synthesis of skeletal muscle proteins in early embryos and regenerating tissue of chick and Triturus. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Mar;26:269–274. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. PAGE S. G., HUXLEY H. E. FILAMENT LENGTHS IN STRIATED MUSCLE. J Cell Biol. 1963 Nov;19:369–390. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. PRICE H. M., HOWES E. L., Jr, BLUMBERG J. M. ULTRASTRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS IN SKELETAL MUSCLE FIBERS INJURED BY COLD. II. CELLS ON THE SARCOLEMMAL TUBE: OBSERVATIONS ON "DISCONTINUOUS" REGENERATION AND MYOFIBRIL FORMATION. Lab Invest. 1964 Oct;13:1279–1302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Page S. G. A comparison of the fine structures of frog slow and twitch muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1965 Aug;26(2):477–497. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Przybylski R. J., Blumberg J. M. Ultrastructural aspects of myogenesis in the chick. Lab Invest. 1966 May;15(5):836–863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. ROBINSON D. S. A study of the adenosine-triphosphatase activity of developing chick muscle. Biochem J. 1952 Dec;52(4):633–638. doi: 10.1042/bj0520633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. SHAFIQ S. A. Electron microscopic studies on the indirect flight muscles of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Differentiation of myofibrils. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:363–373. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. SLAUTTERBACK D. B. CYTOPLASMIC MICROTUBULES. I. HYDRA. J Cell Biol. 1963 Aug;18:367–388. doi: 10.1083/jcb.18.2.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. STOCKDALE F. E., HOLTZER H. DNA synthesis and myogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Sep;24:508–520. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90450-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. STREHLER B. L., KONIGSBERG I. R., KELLEY J. E. PLOIDY OF MYOTUBE NUCLEI DEVELOPING IN VITRO AS DETERMINED WITH A RECORDING DOUBLE BEAM MICRO-SPECTROPHOTOMETER. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Nov;32:232–241. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90098-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tilney L. G., Hiramoto Y., Marsland D. Studies on the microtubules in heliozoa. 3. A pressure analysis of the role of these structures in the formation and maintenance of the axopodia of Actinosphaerium nucleofilum (Barrett). J Cell Biol. 1966 Apr;29(1):77–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.29.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. VAN BREEMEN V. L. Myofibril development observed with the electron microscope. Anat Rec. 1952 Jun;113(2):179–195. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091130205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. WAINRACH S., SOTELO J. R. Electron microscope study of the developing chick embryo heart. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1961;55:622–634. doi: 10.1007/BF00384502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. WOODS E. F., HIMMELFARB S., HARRINGTON W. F. Studies on the structure of myosin in solution. J Biol Chem. 1963 Jul;238:2374–2385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. YAFFE D., FELDMAN M. THE EFFECT OF ACTINOMYCIN D ON HEART AND THIGH MUSCLE CELLS GROWN IN VITRO. Dev Biol. 1964 Jun;9:347–366. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(64)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES