Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1968 Jun 1;37(3):794–817. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.3.794

THE NERVOUS ENVIRONMENT OF INDIVIDUAL SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS OF THE GUINEA PIG VAS DEFERENS

Neil C R Merrillees 1
PMCID: PMC2107450  PMID: 11905209

Abstract

Smooth muscle cells of the external longitudinal coat of the guinea pig vas deferens were followed for 480 µ at 4.5-µ intervals. Muscle bundles and fibers interwove, facilitating intermuscular and neuromuscular contacts. The ribbon- or rodlike muscle cells were about 450 µ long, 3,000 µ3 in volume, and 4,500 µ2 in area. The thickened nuclear zone lay anywhere along the middle one-third of the cell. Intercellular distances were 500–800 A. Intrusions were rare, and tight-junctions absent. At any level in a field of 80 muscle fibers there were 10–15 nerve bundles, each containing several varicose axons. Bundles and axons divided. Axons, en passage, were frequently within 500–1,000 A of a muscle fiber. En passage close contacts were rate. Axon terminations were bare, and bare axons invariably terminated. Bare terminations had scattered vesicle-laden varicosities and were from 10µ-60 µ in length, and all ended within 500 A of muscle fibers. Some made close contact with muscle fibers. Less than half of the muscle cells received this close contact, but some cells were approached by more than one termination. Most terminations involved more than one cell. Some cells had little or no innervation. Some groups of cells had a rich innervation. There was very little evidence of sensory innervation. These conclusions are not valid for other smooth muscles.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLEICHMAR H., DE ROBERTIS E. Submicroscopic morphology of the infrared receptor of pit vipers. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1962;56:748–761. doi: 10.1007/BF00336332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett M. R., Merrillees N. C. An analysis of the transmission of excitation from autonomic nerves to smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):520–535. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett M. R., Rogers D. C. A study of the innervation of the taenia coli. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jun;33(3):573–596. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CAUNA N., ROSS L. L. The fine structure of Meissner's touch corpuscles of human fingers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Oct;8:467–482. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.2.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gorycki M. A. Aligning block faces by reflected light for precise sectioning. Stain Technol. 1965 Sep;40(5):265–267. doi: 10.3109/10520296509116424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ISAAC P. K. MECHANICAL TRIMMING OF EMBEDDED BLOCKS FOR ULTRAMICROTOMY. Stain Technol. 1964 Jul;39:225–227. doi: 10.3109/10520296409061234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KARNOVSKY M. J. Simple methods for "staining with lead" at high pH in electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:729–732. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MERRILLEES N. C., BURNSTOCK G., HOLMAN M. E. CORRELATION OF FINE STRUCTURE AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE INNERVATION OF SMOOTH MUSCLE IN THE GUINEA PIG VAS DEFERENS. J Cell Biol. 1963 Dec;19:529–550. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MERRILLEES N. C. The fine structure of muscle spindles in the lumbrical muscles of the rat. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jul;7:725–742. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. PEACHEY L. D. Thin sections. I. A study of section thickness and physical distortion produced during microtomy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 May 25;4(3):233–242. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.3.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PEASE D. C., QUILLIAM T. A. Electron microscopy of the pacinian corpuscle. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 May 25;3(3):331–342. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.3.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RICHARDSON K. C. The fine structure of autonomic nerve endings in smooth muscle of the rat vas deferens. J Anat. 1962 Oct;96:427–442. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richardson K. C. Electron microscopic identification of autonomic nerve endings. Nature. 1966 May 14;210(5037):756–756. doi: 10.1038/210756a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. THAEMERT J. C. The ultrastructure and disposition of vesiculated nerve processes in smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1963 Feb;16:361–377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.2.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thaemert J. C. Ultrastructural interrelationships of nerve processes and smooth muscle cells in three dimensions. J Cell Biol. 1966 Jan;28(1):37–49. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Harreveld A., Malhotra S. K. Extracellular space in the cerebral cortex of the mouse. J Anat. 1967 Apr;101(Pt 2):197–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES