Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1968 Oct 1;39(1):135–151. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.1.135

HUMAN WOUND REPAIR

I. Epidermal Regeneration

George Odland 1, Russell Ross 1
PMCID: PMC2107509  PMID: 5678445

Abstract

A series of linearly incised superficial skin wounds was made on the forearms of young adult male volunteers. Wounds were sampled at several intervals between 3 hr and 21 days after wounding, for study by light and electron microscopy. The light microscopic observations show that regeneration of epidermis in human wounds conforms chronologically to that reported for the epidermis in superficial wound repair in laboratory animals. It is further shown that "ruffling" of cell membranes characterizes the cells of the migrating epidermis in early wound healing. This study reveals that the basement lamina and hemidesmosomes are established by epidermis in contact with the fibrin net at the base of early wounds. Epidermal cells in the wound environment are shown to be phagocytic. Analysis of the submicroscopic cytology of differentiating and maturing regenerated epidermis reveals that, in the sequence of events, the formation of filaments, basal lamina, and desmosomes is followed chronologically by evolution of keratohyalin granules and, subsequently, by keratinization of the surface epidermal elements. The entire sequence of migration, differentiation, and ultimate keratinization in the superficial wounds studied requires 3–5 days for completion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABERCROMBIE M. The bases of the locomotory behaviour of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1961;Suppl 8:188–198. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90348-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CURTIS A. S. Cell contact and adhesion. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1962 Feb;37:82–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1962.tb01605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HAY E. D., REVEL J. P. Autoradiographic studies of the origin of the basement lamella in Ambystoma. Dev Biol. 1963 Mar;6:152–168. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(63)90114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huber J. D., Parker F., Odland G. F. A basic fuchsin and alkalinized methylene blue rapid stain for epoxy-embedded tissue. Stain Technol. 1968 Mar;43(2):83–87. doi: 10.3109/10520296809115048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pierce G. B., Jr, Nakane P. K. Antigens of epithelial basement membranes of mouse, rat, and man. A study utilizing enzyme-labeled antibody. Lab Invest. 1967 Nov;17(5):499–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ross R. The fibroblast and wound repair. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1968 Feb;43(1):51–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1968.tb01109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. VIZIAM C. B., MATOLTSY A. G., MESCON H. EPITHELIALIZATION OF SMALL WOUNDS. J Invest Dermatol. 1964 Dec;43:499–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vaughan R. B., Trinkaus J. P. Movements of epithelial cell sheets in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1966 Dec;1(4):407–413. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.4.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WESSELLS N. K. SUBSTRATE AND NUTRIENT EFFECTS UPON EPIDERMAL BASAL CELL ORIENTATION AND PROLIFERATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Aug;52:252–259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.2.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ZAHIR M. EFFECT OF SCABS ON THE RATE OF EPIDERMAL REGENERATION IN THE SKIN WOUNDS OF GUINEA PIGS. Nature. 1963 Sep 7;199:1013–1014. doi: 10.1038/1991013a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES