Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1968 Nov 1;39(2):404–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.2.404

PROTEINS IN NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC INTERACTIONS

III. Redistributions of Nuclear Proteins During and Following Mitosis in Amoeba proteus

David Prescott 1, Lester Goldstein 1
PMCID: PMC2107536  PMID: 5677972

Abstract

The behavior of nuclear proteins in Amoeba proteus was studied by tritiated amino acid labeling, nuclear transplantation, and cytoplasmic amputation. During prophase at least 77% (but probably over 95%) of the nuclear proteins is released to the cytoplasm. These same proteins return to the nucleus within the first 3 hr of interphase. When cytoplasm is amputated from an ameba in mitosis (shen the nuclear proteins are in the cytoplasm), the resultant daughter nuclei are depleted in the labeled nuclear proteins. The degree of depletion is less than proportional to the amount of cytoplasm removed because a portion of rapidly migrating protein (a nuclear protein that is normally shuttling between nucleus and cytoplasm and is thus also present in the cytoplasm) which would normally remain in the cytoplasm is taken up by the reconstituting daughter nuclei. Cytoplasmic fragments cut from mitotic cells are enriched in both major classes of nuclear proteins, i.e. rapidly migrating protein and slow turn-over protein. An interphase nucleus implanted into such an enucleated cell acquires from the cytoplasm essentially all of the excess nuclear proteins of both classes. The data indicate that there is a lack of binding sites in the cytoplasm for the rapidly migrating nuclear protein. The quantitative aspects of the distribution of rapidly migrating protein between the nucleus and the cytoplasm indicate that the distribution is governed primarily by factors within the nucleus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (740.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BYERS T. J., PLATT D. B., GOLDSTEIN L. THE CYTONUCLEOPROTEINS OF AMEBAE. II. SOME ASPECTS OF CYTONUCLEOPROTEIN BEHAVIOR AND SYNTHESIS. J Cell Biol. 1963 Dec;19:467–475. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.3.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldstein L., Prescott D. M. Proteins in nucleocytoplasmic interactions. I. The fundamental characteristics of the rapidly migrating proteins and the slow turnover proteins of the Amoeba proteus nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jun;33(3):637–644. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HARRIS H. Formation of the nucleolus in animal cells. Nature. 1961 Jun 17;190:1077–1078. doi: 10.1038/1901077a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Immers J., Markman B., Runnström J. Nuclear changes in the course of development of the sea urchin studied by means of Hale staining. Exp Cell Res. 1967 Sep;47(3):425–442. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(67)90001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MARTIN P. G. Evidence for the continuity of nucleolar material in mitosis. Nature. 1961 Jun 17;190:1078–1079. doi: 10.1038/1901078a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. RICHARDS B. M., BAJER A. Mitosis in endosperm. Changes in nuclear and chromosome mass during mitosis. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Jan;22:503–508. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90126-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sims R. T. The synthesis and migration of nuclear proteins during mitosis and differentiation of cells in rats. Q J Microsc Sci. 1965 Sep;106(3):229–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES