Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1969 Jan 1;40(1):28–43. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.1.28

EXCEPTIONS TO THE PREVAILING PATTERN OF TUBULES (9 + 9 + 2) IN THE SPERM FLAGELLA OF CERTAIN INSECT SPECIES

David M Phillips 1
PMCID: PMC2107587  PMID: 5812428

Abstract

Various deviations from classical 9 + 2 flagellar structure are found in sperm of insect species. In mature spermatozoa of a psocid, Psocus, the outer flagellar tubules are not straight, but are disposed in a long-pitched helix such that they form an angle of about 8° with a single dense rod located in the position usually occupied by the central pair. In young spermatids of Psocus the outer tubules are straight; thus, spiraling of the flagellar tubules occurs during the course of spermiogenesis. Spiraling of flagella also occurs in the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis. Variations in the number and morphology of the central element or elements occur in other insect species besides Psocus. Among the observed deviations from a central pair of tubules are a 9 + 0 tubule pattern in the sperm of three species of mayflies, a 9 + 1 tubule pattern in the sperm of two species of mosquitoes, and 9 + 7 tubules in sperm of two species of caddis flies. Spermatozoa of treehoppers vary in yet another respect from the typical 9 + 9 + 2 insect flagellum. These sperm tails branch into four long tails, three of which each contain two doublet and two singlet tubules while the fourth branch contains three doublet and three singlet tubules. The wide distribution of insects with aberrant flagella suggests that the variant forms have evolved independently.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AFZELIUS B. Electron microscopy of the sperm tail; results obtained with a new fixative. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Mar 25;5(2):269–278. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAWA S. R. ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY OF SPERMIOGENESIS IN A FIRE-BRAT INSECT, THRMOBIA DOMESTICA PACK. I. MATURE SPERMATOZOON. J Cell Biol. 1964 Dec;23:431–446. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.3.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behnke O., Forer A. Evidence for four classes of microtubules in individual cells. J Cell Sci. 1967 Jun;2(2):169–192. doi: 10.1242/jcs.2.2.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FAWCETT D. W., ITO S. THE FINE STRUCTURE OF BAT SPERMATOZOA. Am J Anat. 1965 May;116:567–609. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001160306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fawcett D. W. The anatomy of the mammalian spermatozoon with particular reference to the guinea pig. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1965 Jul 30;67(3):279–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00339376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GIBBONS I. R., GRIMSTONE A. V. On flagellar structure in certain flagellates. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Jul;7:697–716. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.4.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KAYE J. S. THE FINE STRUCTURE OF FLAGELLA IN SPERMATIDS OF THE HOUSE CRICKET. J Cell Biol. 1964 Sep;22:710–714. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.3.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kessel R. G. An electron microscope study of spermiogenesis in the grasshopper with particular reference to the development of microtubular systems during differentiation. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Jun;18(5):677–694. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80213-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kessel R. G. The association between microtubules and nuclei during spermiogenesis in the dragonfly. J Ultrastruct Res. 1966 Oct;16(3):293–304. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(66)80064-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meyer G. F. Spermiogenese in normalen und Y-defizienten Männchen von Drosophila melanogaster und D. hydei. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1968;84(2):141–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Phillips D. M. Fine structure of Sciara coprophila sperm. J Cell Biol. 1966 Sep;30(3):499–517. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.3.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Phillips D. M. Observations on spermiogenesis in the fungus gnat Sciara coprophila. J Cell Biol. 1966 Sep;30(3):477–497. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.3.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Robison W. G., Jr Microtubules in relation to the motility of a sperm syncytium in an armored scale insect. J Cell Biol. 1966 May;29(2):251–265. doi: 10.1083/jcb.29.2.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SATIR P. STUDIES ON CILIA. THE FIXATION OF THE METACHRONAL WAVE. J Cell Biol. 1963 Aug;18:345–365. doi: 10.1083/jcb.18.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. VENABLE J. H., COGGESHALL R. A SIMPLIFIED LEAD CITRATE STAIN FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1965 May;25:407–408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.2.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yasuzumi G., Oura C. Spermatogenesis in animals as revealed by electron microscopy. XV. The fine structure of the middle piece in the developing spermatid of the silkworm, Bombyx mori Linné. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1965 Aug 5;67(4):502–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES