Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1969 Jan 1;40(1):1–7. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.1.1

THE ANATOMIC SITE OF THE TRANSEPITHELIAL PERMEABILITY BARRIERS OF TOAD BLADDER

Donald R DiBona 1, Mortimer M Civan 1, Alexander Leaf 1
PMCID: PMC2107595  PMID: 5782445

Abstract

An examination of the mucosal epithelium of the urinary bladder of the toad reveals that the two major cell types which abut on the urinary surface, the granular and mitochondria-rich cells, also contact the basement membrane. Thus, the epithelium functions as a single cell layer. Although basal cells are interpolated between the granular cells and the basement membrane over a large portion of the epithelium, they do not constitute an additional continuous cell layer. This finding is consistent with extensive physiological data which had assumed that the major permeability barriers of this epithelium were the apical and basal-lateral plasma membranes of a single layer of cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (605.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CHOI J. K. The fine structure of the urinary bladder of the toad, Bufo marinus. J Cell Biol. 1963 Jan;16:53–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Civan M. M., Frazier H. S. The site of the stimulatory action of vasopressin on sodium transport in toad bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1968 May;51(5):589–605. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.5.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Civan M. M., Kedem O., Leaf A. Effect of vasopressin on toad bladder under conditions of zero net sodium transport. Am J Physiol. 1966 Sep;211(3):569–575. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.211.3.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FRAZIER H. S., LEAF A. The electrical characteristics of active sodium transport in the toad bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jan;46:491–503. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.3.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FRAZIER H. S. The electrical potential profile of the isolated toad bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Jan;45:515–528. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.3.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KELLER A. R. A HISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF THE TOAD URINARY BLADDER. Anat Rec. 1963 Nov;147:367–377. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091470308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leaf A. Transepithelial transport and its hormonal control in toad bladder. Ergeb Physiol. 1965;56:216–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loewenstein W. R., Socolar S. J., Higashino S., Kanno Y., Davidson N. Intercellular Communication: Renal, Urinary Bladder, Sensory, and Salivary Gland Cells. Science. 1965 Jul 16;149(3681):295–298. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3681.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PEACHEY L. D., RASMUSSEN H. Structure of the toad's urinary bladder as related to its physiology. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Aug;10:529–553. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.4.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SHARP G. W., LEAF A. BIOLOGICAL ACTION OF ALDOSTERONE IN VITRO. Nature. 1964 Jun 20;202:1185–1188. doi: 10.1038/2021185a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES