Abstract
A reductive benzoate pathway is the central conduit for the anaerobic biodegradation of aromatic pollutants and lignin monomers. Benzene ring reduction requires a large input of energy and this metabolic capability has, so far, been reported only in bacteria. To determine the molecular basis for this environmentally important process, we cloned and analyzed genes required for the anaerobic degradation of benzoate and related compounds from the phototrophic bacterium, Rhodopseudomonas palustris. A cluster of 24 genes was identified that includes twelve genes likely to be involved in anaerobic benzoate degradation and additional genes that convert the related compounds 4-hydroxybenzoate and cyclohexanecarboxylate to benzoyl-CoA. Genes encoding benzoyl-CoA reductase, a novel enzyme able to overcome the resonance stability of the aromatic ring, were identified by directed mutagenesis. The gene encoding the ring-cleavage enzyme, 2-ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA hydrolase, was identified by assaying the enzymatic activity of the protein expressed in Escherichia coli. Physiological data and DNA sequence analyses indicate that the benzoate pathway consists of unusual enzymes for ring reduction and cleavage interposed among enzymes homologous to those catalyzing fatty acid degradation. The cloned genes should be useful as probes to identify benzoate degradation genes from other metabolically distinct groups of anaerobic bacteria, such as denitrifying bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria.
The anaerobic degradation of aromatic rings is an important metabolic process carried out by bacteria that does not appear to be catalyzed by eukaryotes. It is important for environmental bioremediation because substantial amounts of toxic aromatic hydrocarbons, produced industrially as solvents and constituents of gasoline, make their way into anoxic groundwaters and sediments. It is also critical to the recycling of biomass on a global scale because aromatic compounds are the monomeric constituents of lignin, a major plant polymer. Although the biodegradation of aromatic rings under anaerobic conditions has great practical significance, remarkably little is known about the biochemical and molecular details of this process.
As a general rule, anaerobic bacteria metabolize structurally diverse aromatic compounds including aromatic hydrocarbons, phenols, halogenated aromatics, and phenylpropanoids, to generate benzoate, usually as its CoA thioester. The subsequent steps of the benzoate pathway make up the central route used for aromatic ring reduction and cleavage by anaerobes (1–4) (Fig. 1). The high resonance energy of the benzene ring makes controlled chemical reduction difficult to achieve in the laboratory and this is also true in biological systems. In fact, the reductive aspect of anaerobic aromatic degradation is distinctive, and radically different from the well-studied oxidative pathways employed by microbes to degrade aromatic compounds in air (15). The anaerobic benzoate pathway has not been defined in detail, but is proposed to include at least six enzymes, just three of which have been purified and partially characterized (7–10). These studies have provided important, but incomplete, information about key features of the pathway. For example, the reaction catalyzed by benzoyl-CoA reductase, an iron-sulfur flavoprotein recently purified from the denitrifying species Thauera aromatica, requires a stoichiometric consumption of ATP (9). This is a feature shared by nitrogenase, a uniquely prokaryotic enzyme that also catalyzes a challenging reduction reaction. To develop a comprehensive view of anaerobic aromatic compound metabolism, we cloned and analyzed a fragment of DNA from the phototrophic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris that appears to include all the genes required for anaerobic benzoate and 4-hydroxybenzoate (4-OHBen) degradation, and at least one gene specific for cyclohexanecarboxylate degradation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions.
R. palustris cultures were grown anaerobically in light, and aerobically with shaking, in defined mineral medium at 30°C as described (16). Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria broth at 37°C. Antibiotic concentrations were as described (17). The cyclohexadienecarboxylates were prepared as described (18). The 2,5- and 1,4-cyclohexadienecarboxylates were gifts from Katharine Gibson (DuPont). Compounds were tested as growth substrates at final concentrations of 3 mM.
Cloning, DNA Manipulations, and Mutant Construction.
Standard protocols were used for DNA cloning and transformation and for plasmid DNA purification (19). DNA fragments were purified from agarose gels by using the geneclean spin kit from Bio 101. Most recombinant plasmids were generated in pUC vectors and were maintained in E. coli DH5α. Chromosomal DNA, purified as described (20), was partially digested with Sau3A1, dephosphorylated with alkaline phosphatase, and ligated into the unique BamHI site of cosmid pHC79 (GIBCO/BRL). The ligation mix was packaged into lambda phage using MaxPlax packaging extract from Epicentre Technologies (Madison, WI) and infected into E. coli strain JM109 (21) as described by the MaxPlax protocol. Cosmid clones pPE302 and pPE304 were identified as described in Results. An R. palustris mutant with a ′lacZ-kanamycin resistance (Kmr) cassette insertion in badE was constructed by inserting the 5.2-kb promoterless lacZ-Kmr cassette derived from pUTminiTn5lacZ (22) into the unique BglII site present on a SacI fragment that was subcloned from pPE304 and that encompassed the 3′ half of badD, all of badE and the 5′ half of badF. A badF:: Kmr mutant was constructed by inserting the 1.3-kb Kmr GenBlock cassette (Pharmacia) into the unique MscI site on the same subclone. Constructions were cloned into the suicide vector, pJQ200KS (23) and then introduced into R. palustris by conjugation from E. coli S17–1. Recombinants were selected as described (20, 24). The badCDEFGA::GmrbadB (Gmr, gentamycin resistance) genes were subcloned on an 11.4-kb XmaI fragment from the cosmid pPE304 into the broad-host-range vector pBBR1MCS (25) for use in complementation experiments.
DNA Sequencing and Computer Analysis.
DNA sequences were determined with an Applied Biosystems model 373A stretch fluorescent automated sequencer at the University of Iowa DNA core facility. Custom synthesized primers were used. DNA templates included overlapping cosmid clones pPE302 and pPE304 and subclones derived from these cosmids. The DNA sequence was analyzed using gene inspector, 1.0.1 (Textco, West Lebanon, NH). Similar sequences were identified from swiss-prot 26, and genpep 78.0, databases using the blast network service at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, MD). The gap program from the Genetics Computer Group (Madison, WI) software package, version 7.0, was used to make sequence comparisons and alignments.
Expression of BadI and BadK in E. coli.
The BadI protein was expressed from the plasmid pDP105, which contained a 1.4-kb fragment of the cosmid clone pPE304 in pUC18. The subcloned DNA included the 782-bp badI gene, as well as the last 230-bp of badH and the first 373 bp of badJ. BadK was expressed from the plasmid pDP111, which consisted of a 1.3-kb fragment of pPE304 in pUC18. The subcloned DNA included the 681-bp badK gene, the last 235 bp of aliA, and 287 bp of DNA downstream of badK. Expression of the proteins was driven from the lac promoter of pUC18. Expression was induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside when cells reached the mid-logarithmic phase of growth.
Enzyme Assays.
Cell extracts were prepared and 2-ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA hydrolase activity determined by measuring the disappearance of a magnesium-enolate complex of the substrate as previously described (26). Cyclohex-1-enecarboxyl-CoA hydratase activity was assayed by measuring the conversion of cyclohex-1-enecarboxyl-CoA to 2-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA. The reaction mixture contained 40 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.5), 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM cyclohex-1-enecarboxyl-CoA. Reactions were initiated by the addition of cell extract and stopped by addition of 100 mM (final concentration) perchloric acid. The reaction product was separated and collected by HPLC (Waters model 501) using a Ultrasphere ODS-C18 reverse-phase (4.6 mm × 25 cm) column (Beckman). The solvent system used was 20 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.0) and methanol as solvents A and B, respectively. The column was equilibrated at 20% solvent B and elution was by a linear gradient of 20–80% B in 30 min. The effluent was monitored by absorbance at 210–260 nm using a photodiode array detector (Waters). Peaks were collected, lyophilized, and resuspended in Milli-Q water. The collected product had a molecular mass that matched that of 2-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA as determined by electrospray mass spectrometry at the University of Iowa High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Research Facility.
β-Galactosidase activity was measured by a variation of the method of Miller (27). Cells in the logarithmic phase of growth were harvested, washed in Z buffer and sonicated. Cell extract and Z buffer were combined to a volume of 1 ml and 0.2 ml of a 4 mg/ml solution of O-nitrophenylgalactopyranoside was added to start the reactions. The rate of increase in absorbance at 420 nm due to O-nitrophenol formation was measured spectrophotometrically. Activity was calculated using millimolar extinction coefficient of 4.5 for O-nitrophenol at 420 nm.
Protein was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit.
Other Procedures.
Primer extension analysis was carried out using the AMV reverse transcriptase primer extension system according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer (Promega). The access reverse transcription–PCR system (Promega) was used to determine the transcriptional organization of the badDEF and G genes. With this technique, reverse transcriptase and an appropriate primer are used to synthesize cDNA from a region of interest. Polymerase chain reactions with primers flanking the intergenic regions of the badDEF and G genes were then used to amplify intergenic DNA from the cDNA. Negative control reactions were done in which reverse transcriptase was omitted to ensure that the DNA products resulted from amplification of cDNA. RNA was prepared using Tri-Reagent from Molecular Research Center (Cincinnati).
Cyclohexanecarboxylate-CoA ligase was purified as described (11) and blotted to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon P; Millipore). Its N-terminal sequence was determined by the Cornell Biotechnology Analytical/Synthesis Facility (Ithaca, NY) using a Waters Pico-Tag system. Immunoblot analysis of cell extracts with benzoate-CoA ligase antiserum was performed as described (10). 2-Ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA and cyclohex-1-enecarboxyl-CoA were synthesized as described (26).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A cosmid clone bank was constructed with chromosomal DNA from an R. palustris mutant (CGA604) that had antibiotic cassette disruptions in genes (badA and hbaA) encoding two CoA ligases; one for initiating benzoate degradation and one for initiating 4-OHBen degradation (12, 20). E. coli cells infected with packaged cosmid DNA were screened for growth in the presence of Gm or Km, or both, to identify clones that included the badA::Gmr or hbaA::Kmr regions of the chromosome. Two overlapping cosmid clones (pPE302 and pPE304) were identified that included the 25.4 kb of DNA shown in Fig. 2. The nucleotide sequences of DNA subcloned from these cosmids were determined. The sequenced DNA includes 24 predicted genes that encode at least 13 proteins, some of which have multiple polypeptide components. The genes encoding the two enzymes required for the conversion of 4-OHBen to benzoyl-CoA (hbaABCD), and the benzoate-CoA ligase gene (badA) have been described (12, 17, 20). Here, we have used physiological observations and sequence information to ascribe functions to many of the other genes in the cluster (Figs. 1 and 2).
The genes badDEF and G are transcribed as an operon, the expression of which is induced by benzoate. A transcription start site was determined by primer extension analysis to be present 71 bases upstream of the predicted translation initiation codon of badD. Reverse transcription–PCR amplification of the intergenic regions between badD and E, badE and F, and badF and G, indicated that the four genes are cotranscribed. Measurement of β-galactosidase activity in a badE::′lacZ strain showed that expression of these genes is induced four-fold by anaerobic growth in the presence of benzoate (Fig. 3).
Mutants with disruptions in badE or badF were constructed by homologous recombination between the wild-type R. palustris chromosome and plasmids containing cloned DNA interrupted with a promoterless lacZ-Kmr cassette or a Kmr cassette, respectively. Neither mutant was able to grow anaerobically with benzoate or 4-OHBen as a sole carbon source, but both grew at wild-type rates on cyclohexa-1,5-, -1,4-, and -2,5-diene-1-carboxylates, the free acid derivatives of three compounds that have been proposed as the first two-equivalent reduction products of benzoyl-CoA reduction (5, 6). The badE and badF mutants accumulated radiolabeled benzoyl-CoA intracellularly when whole cells were provided with 14C benzoate (Fig. 4). The benzoate growth defect of the mutants is not due to an effect of the mutations on genes downstream of badG because immunoblot analysis of cell extracts prepared from the badE and badF strains showed that the product of badA, the gene immediately downstream of badG, is expressed. We were also able to complement the benzoate growth defect in trans by introducing a clone containing badDEFGA::GmrbadB into the badE and badF mutant strains.
These data suggest that badDEFG encode the enzyme benzoyl-CoA reductase (Fig. 1). In support of this, the sizes of the predicted protein products of badDEFG (44.0, 47.6, 47.8, and 29.6 kDa) are similar to those of the four subunits of the benzoyl-CoA reductase purified from T. aromatica (38, 45, 48, and 32 kDa) (9). Moreover, the experimentally determined N-terminal amino acid sequences of the benzoyl-CoA reductase subunits from T. aromatica are similar to the deduced N-terminal amino acid sequences of the corresponding Bad proteins from R. palustris. When the sequences of the first 30 N-terminal amino acids of the α, β, γ, and δ subunits from the T. aromatica benzoyl-CoA reductase were compared with those of BadF, BadE, BadD and BadG, respectively, from R. palustris, amino acid identities of 76%, 33%, 78%, and 68% were seen in regions of overlap that included 17, 15, 18, and 25 amino acid residues for the four pairwise comparisons (G. Fuchs, personal communication). This level of identity suggests that there may be a high degree of conservation between the benzoyl-CoA reductases of T. aromatica, a member of the β subdivision of the proteobacteria (28), and R. palustris, which is a member of the α subdivision.
The deduced amino acid sequences of the BadD, E, F, and G proteins are notable for their lack of similarity to all characterized proteins in genome databases except one: 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase, an enzyme responsible for the reversible dehydration of (R)-2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA to glutaconyl-CoA in the pathway of glutamate fermentation by the bacterium Acidaminococcus fermentans (29, 31). The reaction catalyzed is unusual because it involves removal of hydrogen atoms from an unactivated carbon atom. Buckel and Keese (32, 33) have proposed that this is accomplished by a one-electron oxidation/reduction by a novel reaction mechanism in which a ketyl radical anion is the first reactive intermediate. Buckel and Keese have noted that a similar mechanism could, in principle, also account for benzoyl-CoA reduction by two successive one-electron transfers (33). 2-Hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase is comprised of two catalytic subunits, HgdA and HgdB, which share amino acid sequence similarity with BadE and BadD, respectively, and HgdC, an activator subunit that is similar in sequence to both BadF and BadG (Fig. 5). Although the homologous pairs of proteins align along their entire lengths, neither shows any large stretches of identity. The BadD and BadE subunits are each predicted to contain several cysteine residues positioned near aromatic amino acids, some of which align with cysteines in the HgdAB sequences. These may be involved in coordinating the iron-sulfur centers that have been observed in purified 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydratase and in benzoyl-CoA reductase.
BadF and BadG are similar in amino acid sequence to each other, as well as to HgdC (Fig. 5). Only catalytic amounts of HgdC and ATP are needed to energize 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA dehydration. Presumably, ATP hydrolysis is required to generate a low potential electron donor that, once made, can function through many catalytic cycles of oxidation and reduction (32). The observation that the T. aromatica benzoyl-CoA reductase is composed of equimolar amounts of each of its four protein components, is consistent with the finding that stoichiometric, rather than catalytic, amounts of ATP are required to catalyze the reduction reaction. The hydrolysis of ATP that, by analogy with the T. aromatica enzyme, is expected to occur during benzoyl-CoA reduction by R. palustris, is probably catalyzed by the two subunits BadF and BadG. When considered as a unit, the predicted amino acid sequence of these polypeptides have an ATPase domain as defined by a pattern of amino acid properties (34). This includes two phosphate binding motifs (one present on each polypeptide) and an adenosine binding domain (on BadF). The energy of ATP hydrolysis may serve to generate an electron donor of sufficiently low potential to overcome the high energy barrier to ring reduction.
Neighboring genes, badC and badB, may encode proteins involved in donating electrons to benzoyl-CoA reductase. The badC sequence predicts a protein with ≈30% amino acid sequence identity to NADPH:quinone oxidoreductases and the deduced amino acid sequence of BadB has a high degree of amino acid identity (≈50%) to clostridial-type ferredoxins. The natural electron donor for benzoyl-CoA reductase has not been reported, but ferredoxins are strong candidates because of their capacity to transfer very low potential electrons.
The three reactions in the benzoate pathway that convert cyclohexadienecarboxyl-CoA to 2-ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA, appear to correspond to the three successive oxidation reactions that typify the classical cycle of fatty acid β-oxidation as studied in bacteria and mammals (35) (Fig. 1). Consistent with this, the badJ and badK gene products have predicted amino acid sequences that are, respectively, ≈35% identical to flavin-containing dehydrogenases and enoyl-CoA hydratases from mammalian mitochondria and bacteria. The badH product has the signature sequence motifs of a short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase (36) and shares 30–40% amino acid sequence identity with NADH-dependent dehydrogenases involved in the biosynthesis of bacterial fatty acids and poly-β-hydroxyalkanoates. Extracts of E. coli cells expressing badK catalyzed the hydration of cyclohex-1-enecarboxyl-CoA to 2-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA, confirming the predicted enzymatic function of this gene product as an enoyl-CoA hydratase. BadH and BadJ have tentatively been assigned the enzymatic functions shown in Fig. 1 based on their amino acid sequence similarities to fatty acid β-oxidation enzymes.
CoA ligases are hallmark enzymes of fatty acid degradation, and three of the genes in the cluster, badA, hbaA, and aliA, encode ligases that catalyze the initial reactions of anaerobic benzoate, 4-OHBen, and cyclohexanecarboxylate degradation, respectively. The badA and hbaA genes were originally identified by immunoscreening with antisera specific to the purified proteins (12, 20). We assigned a function to aliA by determining the sequence of the first 14 N-terminal amino acids of cyclohexanecarboxylate-CoA ligase (11) and finding that it matched the deduced amino acid sequence of the N terminus of the gene product exactly. Each of the aromatic and alicyclic acid CoA ligases is 20–30% identical at the amino acid level to ligases from both prokaryotic and eukaryotic sources that activate fatty acids with CoA.
The ring opening step of anaerobic benzoate degradation involves a hydrolytic cleavage, rather than the thiolytic cleavage that is typical of fatty acid degradation. In R. palustris this is accomplished by a previously unknown enzyme, 2-ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA hydrolase (10, 26). We identified the gene encoding this enzyme, badI, by showing that the encoded protein catalyzed the cleavage of 2-ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA when expressed in E. coli from pUC18. The specific activities measured in E. coli cell extracts were ≈five-fold higher than those measured in extracts of benzoate-grown R. palustris cells (26). The BadI amino acid sequence has 32% amino acid identity to BadK (Fig. 1), proposed to function as cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxyl-CoA hydratase, and it is ≈45% identical to dihydroxynaphthoate synthase from Bacillus subtilis and E. coli, a ring closure enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of menaquinone, a low potential H carrier.
In addition to structural genes, the benzoate degradation gene cluster includes a possible regulatory gene, badR. The predicted BadR protein has 28% amino acid identity to an E. coli protein termed HpcR (37), that regulates expression of genes for aerobic homoprotocatechuate degradation. Neither BadR or HpcR show any striking amino acid similarities to other characterized regulators. A cluster of five genes downstream of hbaA are predicted to encode a binding protein-dependent permease belonging to the general category of ABC transporters (38). Although it is tempting to speculate that such a permease may catalyze the uptake of benzoate or 4-OHBen into cells, this has not yet been shown. Two ORFs (designated 1 and 2) whose predicted products do not resemble characterized proteins in sequence databases lie downstream of this gene cluster. A regulatory protein of the Crp/Fnr class that is essential for anaerobic growth of R. palustris on 4-OHBen, and that is required for optimal growth on benzoate, has been described (39). The location of the gene encoding this protein, called aadR, for anaerobic aromatic degradation regulator, relative to the bad-hba gene cluster, is not known, but this is the only known relevant gene located outside the cluster.
Nucleotide sequencing indicates that genes involved in the biosynthesis of flagella lie immediately downstream of badK. We cannot exclude the possibility of additional genes for aromatic compound degradation at the other end of the cluster, downstream of hbaD. However, the structural genes described here can account for all the reactions known or hypothesized to be required for the conversion of benzoate and 4-OHBen to the ring cleavage product, pimelyl-CoA. This includes reactions proposed by Koch et al. (5) that differ somewhat from those shown in Fig. 1 and that involve conversion of the product of benzoyl-CoA reduction, cyclohexadienecarboxyl-CoA, to a dihydroxylated intermediate (2,6-dihydroxycyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA) by two hydration steps, followed by a dehydrogenation to generate 2-keto-6-hydroxycylohexanecarboxyl-CoA. Cleavage of this substrate would then generate 3-hydroxypimelyl-CoA rather than pimelyl-CoA. It is possible that the physiological role of the BadK, BadH, and BadI proteins is to catalyze this alternative series of reactions. This would require that these enzymes be active with substrates that have slightly different structures than those with which they have been shown to be active so far.
CONCLUSIONS
The results described here suggest that the anaerobic benzoate degradation pathway consists of enzymes specifying the common metabolic theme of fatty acid degradation, mixed with a reductive enzyme that appears to have very restricted metabolic application, and an enzyme (2-ketocyclohexanecarboxyl-CoA hydrolase) that may have been recruited from a biosynthetic sequence. It is also noteworthy that genes for the degradation of benzoate and 4-OHBen, two compounds that are key aromatic intermediates formed during the anaerobic degradation of many structurally diverse aromatic compounds (3, 4), lie adjacent to each other. The nucleotide sequences of the genes shown in Fig. 2 have been useful for posing hypotheses about gene function that can be tested by genetic and biochemical means. Here, we have presented experimental evidence in support of gene assignments for four of the six enzymes of the benzoate pathway and for one of the two enzymes of cyclohexanecarboxylate degradation. Evidence for the genes encoding the two enzymes specific to 4-OHBen degradation has been presented previously (12, 17). These results provide a framework for additional studies that will be required in order for firm assignments to be made to each of the 24 genes in the bad–hba cluster. We anticipate that the sequences reported here will stimulate studies on the properties of the enzymes of anaerobic benzoate and 4-OHBen degradation. For example, the cloned bad–hba genes will permit site-directed mutagenesis as an approach to probing enzyme mechanisms. This will be especially useful in studies of the benzoyl-CoA and 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA reductases. It may be that the rate-limiting step in the overall degradation of many aromatic compounds, benzoyl-CoA reduction, can be relieved through genetic engineering. The R. palustris benzoate degradation genes will also be useful in comparative studies with other physiological types of anaerobic bacteria, and possibly, for identifying homologous genes from other groups of anaerobes. It is generally assumed that the essential biochemistry of attack on the benzene ring is the same in fermentative bacteria, phototrophic bacteria (e.g., R. palustris), and different groups of anaerobic respiring bacteria (nitrate-, sulfate-, and iron-respirers), but the possibility that there may be major or minor differences in the enzymes of benzoate degradation among different physiological types of anaerobes needs to be explored for both fundamental and practical reasons.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Division of Energy Biosciences (DE-FG02-86ER13495 to J.G. and DE-FG02-95ER20184 to C.S.H.), and by the U.S. Army Research Office (DAAH04-95-0124 and -0315 to C.S.H.).
ABBREVIATIONS
- 4-OHBen
4-hydroxybenzoate
- Kmr
kanamycin resistance
- Gmr
gentamycin resistance
Footnotes
References
- 1.Dutton P L, Evans W C. Biochem J. 1969;113:525–536. doi: 10.1042/bj1130525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gibson J, Harwood C S. In: Anoxygenic Photosynthetic Bacteria. Blankenship R E, Madigan M T, Bauer C E, editors. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1995. pp. 991–1003. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harwood C S, Gibson J. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:301–309. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.2.301-309.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heider J, Fuchs G. Eur J Biochem. 1997;243:577–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00577.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koch J, Eisenreich W, Bacher A, Fuchs G. Eur J Biochem. 1993;221:649–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17593.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gibson K J, Gibson J. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58:696–698. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.2.696-698.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Geissler J F, Harwood C S, Gibson J. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:1709–1714. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.4.1709-1714.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Altenschmidt U, Oswald B, Fuchs G. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:5494–5501. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.17.5494-5501.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boll M, Fuchs G. Eur J Biochem. 1995;234:921–933. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.921_a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pelletier D A, Harwood C S. Abstr Annu Meet Am Soc Microbiol. 1996;96:Q-161. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Küver J, Xue J Y, Gibson J. Arch Microbiol. 1995;164:337–345. doi: 10.1007/BF02529980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gibson J, Dispensa M, Fogg G C, Evans D T, Harwood C S. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:634–641. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.3.634-641.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Biegert T, Altenschmidt U, Eckerskorn C, Fuchs G. Eur J Biochem. 1993;213:555–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brackmann R, Fuchs G. Eur J Biochem. 1993;213:563–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17795.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harayama S, Kok M, Neidle E L. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1992;46:565–601. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.003025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim M-K, Harwood C S. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991;83:199–204. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gibson J, Dispensa M, Harwood C S. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:634–642. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.3.634-642.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reynolds K A, Wang P, Fox K M, Floss H G. J Antibiot. 1992;45:411–419. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.45.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ausubel F M, Brent R, Kingston R E, Moore D D, Seidman J G, Smith J A, Struhl K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: Greene; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Egland P G, Gibson J, Harwood C S. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:6545–6551. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.22.6545-6551.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Gene. 1985;33:103–119. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.De Lorenzo V, Cases I, Herrero M, Timmis K N. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:6902–6907. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.21.6902-6907.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Quandt J, Hynes M F. Gene. 1993;127:15–21. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90611-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Parales R E, Harwood C S. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5829–5838. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.18.5829-5838.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kovach M E, Phillips R W, Elzer P H, Roop R M, II, Peterson K M. BioTechniques. 1994;16:800–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Perrotta J A, Harwood C S. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:1775–1782. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.6.1775-1782.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Miller J H. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Anders H-J, Kaetzke A, Kämpfer P, Ludwig W, Fuchs G. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45:327–333. doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-2-327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dutscho R, Wohlfarth G, Buckel P, Buckel W. Eur J Biochem. 1989;181:741–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb14786.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Merkel S M, Eberhard A E, Gibson J, Harwood C S. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:1–7. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.1.1-7.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Müller U, Buckel W. Eur J Biochem. 1995;230:698–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Buckel W. FEBS Lett. 1996;389:20–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00530-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Buckel W, Keese R. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1995;34:1502–1506. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bork P, Sander C, Valencia A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7290–7294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nunn W D. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50:179–192. doi: 10.1128/mr.50.2.179-192.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Persson B, Krook M, Jörnvall H. Eur J Biochem. 1991;200:537–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roper D I, Fawcett T, Cooper R A. Mol Gen Genet. 1993;237:241–250. doi: 10.1007/BF00282806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Higgins C F. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1992;8:67–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.000435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dispensa M, Thomas C T, Kim M-K, Perrotta J A, Gibson J, Harwood C S. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:5803–5813. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.18.5803-5813.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]