Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1969 Sep 1;42(3):683–694. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.3.683

ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDIES ON THE CONTRACTILE MECHANISM OF SMOOTH MUSCLE

Robert E Kelly 1, Robert V Rice 1
PMCID: PMC2107698  PMID: 5801426

Abstract

Fresh taenia coli and chicken gizzard smooth muscle were studied in the contracted and relaxed states. Thick and thin filaments were observed in certain (but not all) cells fixed in contraction. Relaxed smooth muscle contained only thin filaments. Several other morphological differences were observed between contracted and relaxed smooth muscle. The nuclear chromatin is clumped in contraction and evenly dispersed in the relaxed state. The sarcolemma is more highly vesiculated in contraction than in relaxation. In contraction, the sarcoplasm also appears more electron opaque. Over-all morphological differences between cells fixed in isometric and in unloaded contraction were also noticeable. The results suggest a sliding filament mechanism of smooth muscle contraction; however, in smooth muscle, unlike striated muscle, the thick filaments appear to be in a highly labile condition in the contractile process. The relation between contraction and a possible change in pH is also discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSON N. G. Cell division. I. A theoretical approach to the primeval mechanism, the initiation of cell division, and chromosomal condensation. Q Rev Biol. 1956 Sep;31(3):169–199. doi: 10.1086/401393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dubuisson M. Studies on the chemical processes which occur in muscle before, during and after contraction. J Physiol. 1939 Jan 14;94(4):461–482. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elliott G. F. Variations of the contractile apparatus in smooth and striated muscles. X-ray diffraction studies at rest and in contraction. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):171–184. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.6.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GANSLER H. [Structure and function of smooth musculature. II. Light and electron microscope findings on cavitary organs of rats, guinea pigs and man]. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1961;55:724–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelly R. E., Rice R. V. Localization of myosin filaments in smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1968 Apr;37(1):105–116. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lane B. P. Alterations in the cytologic detail of intestinal smooth muscle cells in various stages of contraction. J Cell Biol. 1965 Oct;27(1):199–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.27.1.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nonomura Y. Myofilaments in smooth muscle of guinea pigs taenia coli. J Cell Biol. 1968 Dec;39(3):741–745. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.3.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PALADE G. E. A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J Exp Med. 1952 Mar;95(3):285–298. doi: 10.1084/jem.95.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PEASE D. C., PAULE W. J. Electron microscopy of elastic arteries; the thoracic aorta of the rat. J Ultrastruct Res. 1960 Jun;3:469–483. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(60)90023-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PROSSER C. L., BURNSTOCK G., KAHN J. Conduction in smooth muscle: comparative structural properties. Am J Physiol. 1960 Sep;199:545–552. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.199.3.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Panner B. J., Honig C. R. Filament ultrastructure and organization in vertebrate smooth muscle. Contraction hypothesis based on localization of actin and myosin. J Cell Biol. 1967 Nov;35(2):303–321. doi: 10.1083/jcb.35.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RHODIN J. A. Fine structure of vascular walls in mammals with special reference to smooth muscle component. Physiol Rev Suppl. 1962 Jul;5:48–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ROSTGAARD J., BARRNETT R. J. FINE STRUCTURE LOCALIZATION OF NUCLEOSIDE PHOSPHATASES IN RELATION TO SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS AND UNMYELINATED NERVES IN THE SMALL INTESTINE OF THE RAT. J Ultrastruct Res. 1964 Aug;11:193–207. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(64)80103-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schirmer R. H. Die Besonderheiten des contractilen Proteins der Arterien. Biochem Z. 1965 Dec 1;343(3):269–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shoenberg C. F. An electron microscope study of the influence of divalent ions on myosin filament formation in chicken gizzard extracts and homogenates. Tissue Cell. 1969;1(1):83–96. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(69)80007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stromer M. H., Hartshorne D. J., Rice R. V. Removal and reconstitution of Z-line material in a striated muscle. J Cell Biol. 1967 Dec;35(3):C23–C28. doi: 10.1083/jcb.35.3.c23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES