Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1969 May 1;41(2):600–619. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.2.600

FLAGELLAR ELONGATION AND SHORTENING IN CHLAMYDOMONAS

The Use of Cycloheximide and Colchicine to Study the Synthesis and Assembly of Flagellar Proteins

Joel L Rosenbaum 1, John E Moulder 1, David L Ringo 1
PMCID: PMC2107765  PMID: 5783876

Abstract

Flagella can be removed from the biflagellate Chlamydomonas and the cells begin to regenerate flagella almost immediately by deceleratory kinetics. Under usual conditions of deflagellation, more than 98% of all flagella are removed. Under less drastic conditions, cells can be selected in which one flagellum is removed and the other left intact. When only one of the two flagella is amputated, the intact flagellum shortens by linear kinetics while the amputated one regenerates. The two flagella attain an equal intermediate length and then approach their initial length at the same rate. A concentration of cycloheximide which inhibits protein synthesis permits less than one-third of each flagellum to form when both flagella are amputated. When only one is amputated in cycloheximide, shortening proceeds normally and the degree of elongation in the amputated flagellum is greater than if both were amputated in the presence of cycloheximide. The shortening process is therefore independent of protein synthesis, and the protein from the shortening flagellum probably enters the pool of precursors available for flagellar formation. Partial regeneration of flagella occurs in concentrations of cycloheximide inhibitory to protein synthesis suggesting that some flagellar precursors are present. Cycloheximide and flagellar pulse-labeling studies indicate that precursor is used during the first part of elongation, is resynthesized at mid-elongation, and approaches its original level as the flagella reach their initial length. Colchicine completely blocks regeneration without affecting protein synthesis, and extended exposure of deflagellated cells to colchicine increases the amount of flagellar growth upon transfer to cycloheximide. When colchicine is applied to cells with only one flagellum removed, shortening continues normally but regeneration is blocked. Therefore, colchicine can be used to separate the processes of shortening and elongation. Radioautographic studies of the growth zone of Chlamydomonas flagella corroborate previous findings that assembly is occurring at the distal end (tip growth) of the organelle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNSTEIN E. Synchronous division in Chlamydomonas moewusii. Science. 1960 May 20;131(3412):1528–1529. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3412.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Binding of colchincine-3H to cellular protein. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):525–533. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Colchicine binding to sea urchin eggs and the mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):535–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Breton-Gorius J., Stralin H. Formation de cils rudimentaires dans les cellules sanguines primitives du sac vitellin d'embryons de rat et de poulet. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol. 1967 Jan-Feb;7(1):79–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedmann I., Colwin A. L., Colwin L. H. Fine-structural aspects of fertilization in Chlamydomonas reinhardi. J Cell Sci. 1968 Mar;3(1):115–128. doi: 10.1242/jcs.3.1.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson U. G., Porter K. R. Fine structure of cell division in Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Basal bodies and microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1968 Aug;38(2):403–425. doi: 10.1083/jcb.38.2.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KATES J. R., JONES R. F. THE CONTROL OF GAMETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN LIQUID CULTURES OF CHLAMYDOMONAS. J Cell Physiol. 1964 Apr;63:157–164. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030630204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LEVINE R. P., EBERSOLD W. T. The genetics and cytology of Chlamydomonas. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1960;14:197–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.14.100160.001213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LEWIN R. A. A device for obtaining mutants with impaired motility. Can J Microbiol. 1960 Feb;6:21–25. doi: 10.1139/m60-004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LEWIN R. A. Mutants of Chlamydomonas moewusii with impaired motility. J Gen Microbiol. 1954 Dec;11(3):358–363. doi: 10.1099/00221287-11-3-358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. RANDALL J., WARR J. R., HOPKINS J. M., MCVITTIE A. A SINGLE-GENE MUTATION OF CHLAMYDOMONAS REINHARDII AFFECTING MOTILITY: A GENETIC AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY. Nature. 1964 Aug 29;203:912–914. doi: 10.1038/203912a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RENAUD F. L., SWIFT H. THE DEVELOPMENT OF BASAL BODIES AND FLAGELLA IN ALLOMYCES ARBUSCULUS. J Cell Biol. 1964 Nov;23:339–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ringo D. L. Flagellar motion and fine structure of the flagellar apparatus in Chlamydomonas. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jun;33(3):543–571. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.3.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ringo D. L. The arrangement of subunits in flagellar fibers. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Feb;17(3):266–277. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rosenbaum J. L., Carlson K. Cilia regeneration in Tetrahymena and its inhibition by colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1969 Feb;40(2):415–425. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.2.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosenbaum J. L., Child F. M. Flagellar regeneration in protozoan flagellates. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jul;34(1):345–364. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.1.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SAGER R., GRANICK S. Nutritional studies with Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1953 Oct 14;56(5):831–838. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1953.tb30261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SOROKIN S. Centrioles and the formation of rudimentary cilia by fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1962 Nov;15:363–377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.15.2.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shelanski M. L., Taylor E. W. Isolation of a protein subunit from microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):549–554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sorokin S. P. Reconstructions of centriole formation and ciliogenesis in mammalian lungs. J Cell Sci. 1968 Jun;3(2):207–230. doi: 10.1242/jcs.3.2.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Steinman R. M. An electron microscopic study of ciliogenesis in developing epidermis and trachea in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. Am J Anat. 1968 Jan;122(1):19–55. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001220103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stubblefield E., Brinkley B. R. Cilia formation in Chinese hamster fibroblasts in vitro as a response to colcemid treatment. J Cell Biol. 1966 Sep;30(3):645–652. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. TAYLOR E. W. THE MECHANISM OF COLCHICINE INHIBITION OF MITOSIS. I. KINETICS OF INHIBITION AND THE BINDING OF H3-COLCHICINE. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:160. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES