Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1970 Jan 1;44(1):134–150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.44.1.134

INHIBITION OF MYOBLAST FUSION AFTER ONE ROUND OF DNA SYNTHESIS IN 5-BROMODEOXYURIDINE

Richard Bischoff 1, Howard Holtzer 1
PMCID: PMC2107791  PMID: 4242927

Abstract

The thymidine analogue 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) has a differential effect on the synthesis of tissue-specific products and molecules required for growth and division. Proliferating myogenic cells cultured in BUdR fail to fuse and fail to initiate the synthesis of contractile protein filaments. Conversely, BUdR has but a minor effect on cell viability and reproductive integrity. Low concentrations of BUdR result in an enhancement of cell number relative to the controls; higher concentrations are cytotoxic. Suppression of myogenesis is reversible after at least 10 cell generations of growth in the analogue. Cells that do not synthesize DNA, such as postmitotic myoblasts and myotubes, are not affected by BUdR. Incorporation of BUdR for one round of DNA synthesis was accomplished by first incubating myogenic cells, prior to fusion, in 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) to block DNA synthesis and collect cells in the presynthetic phase. The cells were then allowed to synthesize either normal DNA or BU-DNA for one S period by circumventing the FUdR block with BUdR or BUdR plus thymidine (TdR). The cultures were continued in FUdR to prevent dilution of the incorporated analogue by further division. After 3 days, the cultures from the FUdR-BUdR series showed the typical BUdR effect; the cells were excessively flattened and few multinucleated myotubes formed. Cells in the control cultures were of normal morphology, and multinucleated myotubes were present. These results were confirmed in another experiment in which BUdR-3H was added to 2-day cultures in which myotubes were forming. Fusion of thymidine-3H-labeled cells begins at 8 hr after the preceding S phase. In contrast, cells which incorporate BUdR-3H for one S period do not fuse with normal myotubes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbott J., Holtzer H. The loss of phenotypic traits by differentiated cells, V. The effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on cloned chondrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Apr;59(4):1144–1151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.4.1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bischoff R., Holtzer H. Mitosis and the processes of differentiation of myogenic cells in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1969 Apr;41(1):188–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.1.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chacko S., Holtzer S., Holtzer H. Suppression of chondrogenic expression in mixtures of normal chondrocytes and BUDR-altered chondrocytes grown in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1969 Jan 27;34(2):183–189. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(69)90629-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen S. S., Flaks J. G., Barner H. D., Loeb M. R., Lichtenstein J. THE MODE OF ACTION OF 5-FLUOROURACIL AND ITS DERIVATIVES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958 Oct 15;44(10):1004–1012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.44.10.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleman J. R., Coleman A. W., Hartline E. J. A clonal study of the reversible inhibition of muscle differentiation by the halogenated thymidine analog 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Dev Biol. 1969 Jun;19(6):527–548. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(69)90036-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DJORDJEVIC B., SZYBALSKI W. Genetics of human cell lines. III. Incorporation of 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine into the deoxyribonucleic acid of human cells and its effect on radiation sensitivity. J Exp Med. 1960 Sep 1;112:509–531. doi: 10.1084/jem.112.3.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DUTTON R. W., DUTTON A. H., VAUGHAN J. H. The effect of 5-bromouracil deoxyriboside on the synthesis of antibody in vitro. Biochem J. 1960 May;75:230–235. doi: 10.1042/bj0750230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EIDINOFF M. L., CHEONG L., RICH M. A. Incorporation of unnatural pyrimidine bases into deoxyribonucleic acid of mammalian cells. Science. 1959 Jun 5;129(3362):1550–1551. doi: 10.1126/science.129.3362.1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gontcharoff M., Mazia D. Developmental consequences of introduction of bromouracil into the DNA of sea urchin embryos during early division stages. Exp Cell Res. 1967 May;46(2):315–327. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(67)90069-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HAKALA M. T. Effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporation on survival of cultured mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962 Nov 26;61:815–823. doi: 10.1016/0926-6550(62)90064-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HAKALA M. T. Mode of action of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on mammalian cells in culture. J Biol Chem. 1959 Dec;234:3072–3076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HOLTZER H., MARSHALL J. M., Jr, FINCK H. An analysis of myogenesis by the use of fluorescent antimyosin. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Sep 25;3(5):705–724. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.5.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haut W. F., Taylor J. H. Studies of bromouracil deoxyriboside substitution in DNA of bean roots (Vicia faba). J Mol Biol. 1967 Jun 28;26(3):389–401. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90311-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacob F. Genetics of the bacterial cell. Science. 1966 Jun 10;152(3728):1470–1478. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3728.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KAJIWARA K., MUELLER G. C. MOLECULAR EVENTS IN THE REPRODUCTION OF ANIMAL CELLS. 3. FRACTIONAL SYNTHESIS OF DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID WITH 5-BROMODEOXYURIDINE AND ITS EFFECT ON CLONING EFFICIENCY. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Nov 15;91:486–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KONIGSBERG I. R., MCELVAIN N., TOOTLE M., HERRMANN H. The dissociability of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis from the development of multinuclearity of muscle cells in culture. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Oct;8:333–343. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.2.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LITTLEFIELD J. W., GOULD E. A. The toxic effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on cultured epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1960 Apr;235:1129–1133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lasher R., Cahn R. D. The effects of 5-Bromodeoxyuridine on the differentiation of chondrocytes in vitro. Dev Biol. 1969 May;19(5):415–435. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(69)90080-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Okazaki K., Holtzer H. An analysis of myogenesis in vitro using fluorescein-labeled antimyosin. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965 Nov-Dec;13(8):726–739. doi: 10.1177/13.8.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Okazaki K., Holtzer H. Myogenesis: fusion, myosin synthesis, and the mitotic cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Nov;56(5):1484–1490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.5.1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. PAUL J., HAGIWARA A. A kinetic study of the action of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine on synthetic processes in mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962 Aug 20;61:243–249. doi: 10.1016/0926-6550(62)90086-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pauling C., Hanawalt P. Nonconservative DNA replication in bacteria after thymine starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Dec;54(6):1728–1735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.6.1728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SANFORD K. K., EARLE W. R., EVANS V. J., WALTZ H. K., SHANNON J. E. The measurement of proliferation in tissue cultures by enumeration of cell nuclei. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1951 Feb;11(4):773–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. STOCKDALE F. E., HOLTZER H. DNA synthesis and myogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Sep;24:508–520. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90450-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. STOCKDALE F., OKAZAKI K., NAMEROFF M., HOLTZER H. 5-BROMODEOXYURIDINE: EFFECT ON MYOGENESIS IN VITRO. Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):533–535. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Szybalski W., Kubinski H., Sheldrick P. Pyrimidine clusters on the transcribing strand of DNA and their possible role in the initiation of RNA synthesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:123–127. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor J. H., Haut W. F., Tung J. EFFECTS OF FLUORODEOXYURIDINE ON DNA REPLICATION, CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE, AND REUNION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Feb;48(2):190–198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.2.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. WESSELLS N. K. DNA SYNTHESIS, MITOSIS, AND DIFFERENTIATION IN PANCREATIC ACINAR CELLS IN VITRO. J Cell Biol. 1964 Mar;20:415–433. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitmore G. F., Gulyas S., Till J. E. Radiation-induced mitotic delay in L cells. Radiat Res. 1967 Jan;30(1):155–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. YAFFE D., FELDMAN M. THE FORMATION OF HYBRID MULTINUCLEATED MUSCLE FIBERS FROM MYOBLASTS OF DIFFERENT GENETIC ORIGIN. Dev Biol. 1965 Apr;11:300–317. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(65)90062-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. ZAMENHOF S., DE GIOVANNI R., GREER S. Induced gene unstabilization. Nature. 1958 Mar 22;181(4612):827–829. doi: 10.1038/181827a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES