Abstract
The effects of four concentrations of colchicine (2.5 x 10-7, x 10-5, x 10-3, and x 10-2 M) on the cell cycle of grasshopper neuroblasts have been determined by direct observations on living cells. The lowest concentration, 2.5 x 10-7 M, does not completely disorganize the spindle but does retard its action. The three higher concentrations disorganize the spindle, so that all cells reaching metaphase are blocked in a c-mitotic condition throughout the period of observations (308 min at 38°C, the minimum duration of the cell cycle in untreated neuroblasts). Continuous treatment with all concentrations reduces the rate at which neuroblasts enter metaphase, the extent of the reduction being a function of increasing concentration and time of exposure. After a short exposure to 2.5 x 10-5 M colchicine, the neuroblasts recover from the inhibiting effects on progression through the cycle to metaphase, but they show no recovery from the inhibiting effects on spindle formation for more than 3 hr. Apparent stimulation of progression rate occurs early in exposure to all concentrations and during recovery from a short exposure to 2.5 x 10-5 M. Morphological alterations in the chromatin of telophase, interphase, and prophase cells are induced by the higher concentrations of colchicine. The data indicate that caution should be exercised in the use of colchicine for determining cell cycle duration and/or the effects of physical and chemical agents on the cycle.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (879.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aronson J., Inoué S. Reversal by light of the action of N-methyl N-desacetyl colchicine on mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):470–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BERTALANFFY F. D. TRITIATED THYMIDINE VERSUS COLCHICINE TECHNIQUE IN THE STUDY OF CELL POPULATION CYTODYNAMICS. Lab Invest. 1964 Aug;13:871–886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BLOCH D. P. Effect of colchicine on synthesis of desoxyribonucleic acid in tissue cultured rat fibroblasts. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953 Nov;84(2):341–346. doi: 10.3181/00379727-84-20641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Binding of colchincine-3H to cellular protein. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):525–533. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHAKRABORTY A., BISWAS B. B. THE EFFECT OF COLCHICINE ON NUCLEIC ACID AND PROTEIN SYNTHESIS. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Apr;38:57–65. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90427-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CREASEY W. A., MARKIW M. E. BIOCHEMICAL EFFECTS OF THE VINCA ALKALOIDS. II. A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF COLCHICINE, VINBLASTINE AND VINCRISTINE ON THE SYNTHESIS OF RIBONUCLEIC ACIDS IN EHRLICH ASCITES CARCINOMA CELLS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Aug 12;87:601–609. doi: 10.1016/0926-6550(64)90278-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlson J. G. A detailed analysis of x-ray-induced prophase delay and reversion of grasshopper neuroblasts in culture. Radiat Res. 1969 Jan;37(1):1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Creasey W. A., Markiw M. E. Biochemical effects of the vinca alkaloids. 3. The synthesis of ribonucleic acid and the incorporation of amino acids in Ehrlich ascites cells in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Aug 10;103(4):635–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzgerald P. H., Brehaut L. A. Depression of DNA synthesis and mitotic index by colchicine in cultured human lymphocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jan;59(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90619-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GAULDEN M. E., NIX M., MOSHMAN J. Effects of oxygen concentration on x-ray-induced mitotic inhibition in living Chortophaga neuroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 1953 Jun;41(3):451–470. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030410306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HELL E., COX D. G. Effects of colchicine and colchemid on synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid in the skin of the guinea pig's ear in vitro. Nature. 1963 Jan 19;197:287–288. doi: 10.1038/197287a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ilan J., Quastel J. H. Effects of colchicine on nucleic acid metabolism during metamorphosis of Tenebrio molitor L. and in some mammalian tissues. Biochem J. 1966 Aug;100(2):448–457. doi: 10.1042/bj1000448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MOUNTER L. A., TURNER M. E. The evaluation of Michaelis constants and maximal velocity kinetic studies of enzymic reactions. Enzymologia. 1963 Feb 15;25:225–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robbins E., Shelanski M. Synthesis of a colchicine-binding protein during the HeLa cell life cycle. J Cell Biol. 1969 Nov;43(2):371–373. doi: 10.1083/jcb.43.2.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHAW E. I. A glutamic acid-glycine medium for prolonged maintenance of high mitotic activity in grasshopper neuroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1956 Dec;11(3):580–586. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(56)90167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharpe H. B., Scott D., Dolphin G. W. Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by x-irradiation in vitro: the effect of culture techniques and blood donors on aberration yield. Mutat Res. 1969 May-Jun;7(3):453–461. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(69)90116-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shelanski M. L., Taylor E. W. Isolation of a protein subunit from microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):549–554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TAYLOR E. W. THE MECHANISM OF COLCHICINE INHIBITION OF MITOSIS. I. KINETICS OF INHIBITION AND THE BINDING OF H3-COLCHICINE. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:160. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WEINFELD H., SANDBERG A. A. EFFECTS OF COLCHICINE ON THE INCORPORATION OF NUCLEIC ACID PRECURSORS INTO RAT LIVER RIBOSENUCLEIC ACID. Biochem Pharmacol. 1964 Dec;13:1627–1637. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(64)90217-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. P. Inhibition of embryonic deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis by colcemid. Eur J Pharmacol. 1968 Jul;3(4):337–340. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(68)90117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]