Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1971 Sep 1;50(3):598–615. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.598

INTERACTION OF ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE IN CHICK OVIDUCT DEVELOPMENT

III. Tubular Gland Cell Cytodifferentiation

Richard D Palmiter 1, Joan T Wrenn 1
PMCID: PMC2108294  PMID: 4329151

Abstract

Administration of estrogen (E) to immature chicks triggers the cytodifferentiation of tubular gland cells in the magnum portion of the oviduct epithelium; these cells synthesize the major egg-white protein, ovalbumin. Electron microscopy and immunoprecipitation of ovalbumin from oviduct explants labeled with radioactive amino acids in tissue culture were used to follow and measure the degree of tubular gland cell cytodifferentiation. Ovalbumin is undetectable in the unstimulated chick oviduct and in oviducts of chicks treated with progesterone (P) for up to 5 days. Ovalbumin synthesis is first detected 24 hr after E administration, and by 5 days it accounts for 35% of the soluble protein being synthesized. Tubular gland cells begin to synthesize ovalbumin before gland formation which commences after 36 hr of E treatment. When E + P are administered together there is initially a synergistic effect on ovalbumin synthesis, however, after 2 days ovalbumin synthesis slows and by 5 days there is only 1/20th as much ovalbumin per magnum as in the E-treated controls. Whereas the magnum wet weight doubles about every 21 hr with E alone, growth stops after 3 days of E + P treatment. Histological and ultrastructural observations show that the partially differentiated tubular gland cells resulting from E + P treatment never invade the stroma and form definitive glands, as they would with E alone. Instead, these cells appear to transform into other cell types—some with cilia and some with unusual flocculent granules. We present a model of tubular gland cell cytodifferentiation and suggest that a distinct protodifferentiated stage exists. P appears to interfere with the normal transition from the protodifferentiated state to the mature tubular gland cell.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cox R. F., Sauerwein H. Studies on the mode of action of progesterone on chicken oviduct epithelium. I. Morphological changes associated with early differentiation of the tissue. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jul;61(1):79–90. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90260-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DAVIS B. J. DISC ELECTROPHORESIS. II. METHOD AND APPLICATION TO HUMAN SERUM PROTEINS. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Dec 28;121:404–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davidson E. H., Crippa M., Mirsky A. E. Evidence for the appearance of novel gene products during amphibian blastulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 May;60(1):152–159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.1.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dingman C. W., Aronow A., Bunting S. L., Peacock A. C., O'Malley B. W. Changes in chick oviduct ribonucleic acid following hormonal stimulation. Biochemistry. 1969 Feb;8(2):489–495. doi: 10.1021/bi00830a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GOLOSOW N., GROBSTEIN C. Epitheliomesenchymal interaction in pancreatic morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 1962 Apr;4:242–255. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(62)90042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grobstein C., Cohen J. Collagenase: effect on the morphogenesis of embryonic salivary epithelium in vitro. Science. 1965 Oct 29;150(3696):626–628. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3696.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hahn W. E., Church R. B., Gorbman A., Wilmot L. Estrone- and progesterone-induced synthesis of new RNA species in the chick oviduct. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1968 Jun;1(3):438–442. doi: 10.1016/0016-6480(68)90055-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KALLMAN F., GROBSTEIN C. FINE STRUCTURE OF DIFFERENTIATING MOUSE PANCREATIC EXOCRINE CELLS IN TRANSFILTER CULTURE. J Cell Biol. 1964 Mar;20:399–413. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.3.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kohler P. O., Grimley P. M., O'Malley B. W. Estrogen-induced cytodifferentiation of the ovalbumin-secreting glands of the chick oviduct. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jan;40(1):8–27. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.1.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LORENZ F. W. Effects of estrogens on domestic fowl and applications in the poultry industry. Vitam Horm. 1954;12:235–275. doi: 10.1016/s0083-6729(08)61014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Malley B. W., McGuire W. L. Studies on the mechanism of action of progesterone in regulation of the synthesis of specific protein. J Clin Invest. 1968 Mar;47(3):654–664. doi: 10.1172/JCI105761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Oka T., Schimke R. T. Interaction of estrogen and progesterone in chick oviduct development. I. Antagonistic effect of progesterone on estrogen-induced proliferation and differentiation of tubular gland cells. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jun;41(3):816–831. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.3.816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oka T., Schimke R. T. Interaction of estrogen and progesterone in chick oviduct development. II. Effects of estrogen and progesterone on tubular gland cell function. J Cell Biol. 1969 Oct;43(1):123–137. doi: 10.1083/jcb.43.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmiter R. D., Christensen A. K., Schimke R. T. Organization of polysomes from pre-existing ribosomes in chick oviduct by a secondary administration of either estradiol or progesterone. J Biol Chem. 1970 Feb 25;245(4):833–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Palmiter R. D., Oka T., Schimke R. T. Modulation of ovalbumin synthesis by estradiol-17 beta and actinomycin D as studied in explants of chick oviduct in culture. J Biol Chem. 1971 Feb 10;246(3):724–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. RICHARDSON K. C., JARETT L., FINKE E. H. Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 1960 Nov;35:313–323. doi: 10.3109/10520296009114754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sekhri K. K., Pitelka D. R., DeOme K. B. Studies of mouse mammary glands. I. Cytomorphology of the normal mammary gland. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1967 Sep;39(3):459–490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spooner B. S., Wessells N. K. Mammalian lung development: interactions in primordium formation and bronchial morphogenesis. J Exp Zool. 1970 Dec;175(4):445–454. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401750404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WESSELLS N. K. SUBSTRATE AND NUTRIENT EFFECTS UPON EPIDERMAL BASAL CELL ORIENTATION AND PROLIFERATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Aug;52:252–259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.2.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weber K., Osborn M. The reliability of molecular weight determinations by dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Biol Chem. 1969 Aug 25;244(16):4406–4412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wessells N. K. Morphology and proliferation during early feather development. Dev Biol. 1965 Aug;12(1):131–153. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(65)90025-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wessells N. K., Rutter W. J. Phases in cell differentiation. Sci Am. 1969 Mar;220(3):36–44. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0369-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES