Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1971 Sep 1;50(3):691–708. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.691

CONTACT-INHIBITED REVERTANT CELL LINES ISOLATED FROM SV40-TRANSFORMED CELLS

II. Ultrastructural Study

N Scott McNutt 1, Lloyd A Culp 1, Paul H Black 1
PMCID: PMC2108300  PMID: 4329154

Abstract

The ultrastructural appearances of normal 3T3, SV40-transformed 3T3 (SV-3T3), and F1A revertant cell lines are compared. Both confluent and subconfluent cultures are described after in situ embedding of the cells for electron microscopy. There is striking nuclear pleomorphism in F1A revertant cells, with many cells having large nuclei compared to the less variable nuclear morphology of both normal 3T3 and SV-3T3 cells. Under the culture conditions used, deep infoldings of the nuclear envelope are prominent in growing cells, e.g., subconfluent normal 3T3 and confluent SV-3T3 cells. Such infoldings are infrequently seen in cultures which display contact inhibition of growth, e.g., normal 3T3 or F1A revertant cells grown just to confluence. In confluent cultures, the cytoplasmic organelles in revertant cells closely resemble those of normal 3T3 cells. In both normal and revertant cells in confluent culture, the peripheral cytoplasm (ectoplasm) has many 70 A filaments (alpha filaments), which are frequently aggregated into bundles. Alpha filaments are also abundant in the ectoplasm near regions of cell-to-cell apposition and in the motile cell processes (filopodia). The abundance and state of aggregation of alpha filaments correlates with contact inhibition of movement and growth in these cell lines since fewer bundles of alpha filaments are seen in growing cells than in contact-inhibited cells. This observation suggests that these filaments may be an important secondary component in the regulation of contact inhibition of movement and, possibly, of growth in normal and revertant cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABERCROMBIE M., AMBROSE E. J. Interference microscope studies of cell contacts in tissue culture. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Oct;15(2):332–345. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ABERCROMBIE M., AMBROSE E. J. The surface properties of cancer cells: a review. Cancer Res. 1962 Jun;22:525–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ABERCROMBIE M., HEAYSMAN J. E., KARTHAUSER H. M. Social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. III. Mutual influence of sarcoma cells and fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Oct;13(2):276–291. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ABERCROMBIE M., HEAYSMAN J. E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1954 May;6(2):293–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90176-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ASHWORTH C. T., LUIBEL F. J., SANDERS E. The fine structure of nuclei in certain human malignant neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol. 1960 Jul;34:9–20. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/34.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ASHWORTH C. T., STEMBRIDGE V. A., LUIBEL F. J. Symposium on probable or possible malignant cervical lesions - carcinoma in situ. I. Histology of carcinoma in situ. A study of basement membranes of normal epithelium, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of uterine cervix utilizing electron microscopy and histochemical methods. Acta Cytol. 1961 Sep-Oct;5:369–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BERNHARD W. SOME PROBLEMS OF FINE STRUCTURE IN TUMOR CELLS. Prog Exp Tumor Res. 1963;3:1–34. doi: 10.1159/000385959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brownlee T. R., Murad T. M. Ultrastructure of mycosis fungoides. Cancer. 1970 Sep;26(3):686–698. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197009)26:3<686::aid-cncr2820260330>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Buckley I. K., Porter K. R. Cytoplasmic fibrils in living cultured cells. A light and electron microscope study. Protoplasma. 1967;64(4):349–380. doi: 10.1007/BF01666538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burger M. M. A difference in the architecture of the surface membrane of normal and virally transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Mar;62(3):994–1001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.3.994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Comings D. E., Kakefuda T. Initiation of deoxyribonucleic acid replication at the nuclear membrane in human cells. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 14;33(1):225–229. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90290-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Comings D. E., Okada T. A. Electron microscopy of human fibroblasts in tissue culture during logarithmic and confluent stages of growth. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Aug;61(2):295–301. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90451-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Culp L. A., Grimes W. J., Black P. H. Contact-inhibited revertant cell lines isolated from SV40-transformed cells. I. Biologic, virologic, and chemical properties. J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep;50(3):682–690. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DE PETRIS S., KARLSBAD G., PERNIS B. Filamentous structures in the cytoplasm of normal mononuclear phagocytes. J Ultrastruct Res. 1962 Aug;7:39–55. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(62)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dallner G., Siekevitz P., Palade G. E. Biogenesis of endoplasmic reticulum membranes. I. Structural and chemical differentiation in developing rat hepatocyte. J Cell Biol. 1966 Jul;30(1):73–96. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Flaxman B. A., Revel J. P., Hay E. D. Tight junctions between contact-inhibited cells in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Dec;58(2):438–443. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90528-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Franks L. M., Riddle P. N., Seal P. Actin-like filaments and cell movements in human ascites tumour cells: an ultrastructural and cinemicrographic study. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Feb;54(2):157–162. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90227-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. GOLDBERG B., GREEN H. AN ANALYSIS OF COLLAGEN SECRETION BY ESTABLISHED MOUSE FIBROBLAST LINES. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jul;22:227–258. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.1.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldman R. D., Follett E. A. Birefringent filamentous organelle in BHK-21 cells and its possible role in cell spreading and motility. Science. 1970 Jul 17;169(3942):286–288. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3942.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ishikawa H., Bischoff R., Holtzer H. Formation of arrowhead complexes with heavy meromyosin in a variety of cell types. J Cell Biol. 1969 Nov;43(2):312–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones A. L., Fawcett D. W. Hypertrophy of the agranular endoplasmic reticulum in hamster liver induced by phenobarbital (with a review on the functions of this organelle in liver). J Histochem Cytochem. 1966 Mar;14(3):215–232. doi: 10.1177/14.3.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Luft J. H. Fine structures of capillary and endocapillary layer as revealed by ruthenium red. Fed Proc. 1966 Nov-Dec;25(6):1773–1783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martinez-Palomo A., Braislovsky C., Bernhard W. Ultrastructural modifications of the cell surface and intercellular contacts of some transformed cell strains. Cancer Res. 1969 Apr;29(4):925–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Martínez-Palomo A. Ultrastructural modifications of intercellular junctions in some epithelial tumors. Lab Invest. 1970 Jun;22(6):605–614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McNutt N. S., Jones A. L. Observations on the ultrastructure of cytodifferentiation in the human fetal adrenal cortex. Lab Invest. 1970 Jun;22(6):513–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McNutt N. S., Weinstein R. S. Carcinoma of the cervix: deficiency of nexus intercellular junctions. Science. 1969 Aug 8;165(3893):597–599. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3893.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morgan H. R. Ultrastructure of the surfaces of cells infected with avian leukosis-sarcoma viruses. J Virol. 1968 Oct;2(10):1133–1146. doi: 10.1128/jvi.2.10.1133-1146.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pollard T. D., Ito S. Cytoplasmic filaments of Amoeba proteus. I. The role of filaments in consistency changes and movement. J Cell Biol. 1970 Aug;46(2):267–289. doi: 10.1083/jcb.46.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pollard T. D., Shelton E., Weihing R. R., Korn E. D. Ultrastructural characterization of F-actin isolated from Acanthamoeba castellanii and identification of cytoplasmic filaments as F-actin by reaction with rabbit heavy meromyosin. J Mol Biol. 1970 May 28;50(1):91–97. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90106-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. ROBBINS E., GONATAS N. K. IN VITRO SELECTION OF THE MITOTIC CELL FOR SUBSEQUENT ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Feb;20:356–359. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.2.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rambourg A., Leblond C. P. Electron microscope observations on the carbohydrate-rich cell coat present at the surface of cells in the rat. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jan;32(1):27–53. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ross R., Bornstein P. The elastic fiber. I. The separation and partial characterization of its macromolecular components. J Cell Biol. 1969 Feb;40(2):366–381. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.2.366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ryter A. Association of the nucleus and the membrane of bacteria: a morphological study. Bacteriol Rev. 1968 Mar;32(1):39–54. doi: 10.1128/br.32.1.39-54.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sachs L. A theory on the mechanism of carcinogenesis by small deoxyribonucleic acid tumour viruses. Nature. 1965 Sep 18;207(5003):1272–1274. doi: 10.1038/2071272a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Spooner B. S., Wessells N. K. Effects of cytochalasin B upon microfilaments involved in morphogenesis of salivary epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jun;66(2):360–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.2.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stoker M. G., Rubin H. Density dependent inhibition of cell growth in culture. Nature. 1967 Jul 8;215(5097):171–172. doi: 10.1038/215171a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Stoker M. Contact and short-range interactions affecting growth of animal cells in culture. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1967;2:107–128. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60285-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Trinkaus J. P., Lentz T. L. Surface specializations of Fundulus cells and their relation to cell movements during gastrulation. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jan;32(1):139–153. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vorbrodt A., Koprowski H. Ruthenium red-stained coat of normal and simian virus 40-transformed cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Dec;43(6):1241–1248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wallach D. F. Cellular membranes and tumor behavior: a new hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Nov;61(3):868–874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.3.868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES