Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1970 Oct 1;47(1):197–210. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.197

A FINE STRUCTURAL STUDY OF ADHESIVE CELL JUNCTIONS IN HETEROTYPIC CELL AGGREGATES

Peter B Armstrong 1
PMCID: PMC2108387  PMID: 4935336

Abstract

Mixed suspensions of cells obtained by dissociation of 7 day chicken embryo heart and pigmented retina were allowed to reaggregate in tissue culture. The reaggregates which resulted contained both kinds of cells. Establishment of homogeneous tissues by cell sorting out in these reaggregates was advanced by 20 hr in culture and was complete within 2 days. When sorting out was advanced, heterotypic aggregates were fixed, sectioned, and examined in the electron microscope. Particular attention was paid to the morphology of regions of contact between cells. No qualitative differences were observed in the contact junctions between like cells (heart-heart or pigmented retina-pigment retina junctions) and unlike cells (heart-pigmented retina junctions). Broad areas of undifferentiated cell contact with cell membranes separated by a 100–200 A gap were formed regardless of cell type. Specialized junctions of the fascia and macula adherens type were also present, not only between like cells but also between unlike cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADAMS E. C., HERTIG A. T. STUDIES ON GUINEA PIG OOCYTES. I. ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CYTOPLASMIC ORGANELLES IN OOCYTES OF PRIMORDIAL AND PRIMARY FOLLICLES. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:397–427. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSON E., BEAMS H. W. Cytological observations on the fine structure of the guinea pig ovary with special reference to the oogonium, primary oocyte and associated follicle cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1960 Jun;3:432–446. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(60)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson E., Harvey W. R. Active transport by the cecropia midgut. II. Fine structure of the midgut epithelium. J Cell Biol. 1966 Oct;31(1):107–134. doi: 10.1083/jcb.31.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Armstrong P. B. On the role of metal cations in cellular adhesion: effect on cell surface charge. J Exp Zool. 1966 Oct;163(1):99–109. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401630110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barber V. C., Wright D. E. The fine structure of the sense organs of the cephalopod mollusc Nautilus. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;102(3):293–312. doi: 10.1007/BF00335442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonnett H. T., Jr Cortical cell death during lateral root formation. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jan;40(1):144–159. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruni C., Porter K. R. The Fine Structure of the Parenchymal Cell of the Normal Rat Liver: I. General Observations. Am J Pathol. 1965 May;46(5):691–755. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. COGGESHALL R. E., FAWCETT D. W. THE FINE STRUCTURE OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM OF THE LEECH, HIRUDO MEDICINALIS. J Neurophysiol. 1964 Mar;27:229–289. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cornell R. Cell-substrate adhesion during cell culture. An ultrastructural study. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Dec;58(2):289–295. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90507-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Enders A. C., Schlafke S. Cytological aspects of trophoblast-uterine interaction in early implantation. Am J Anat. 1969 May;125(1):1–29. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001250102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FARQUHAR M. G., PALADE G. E. Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:375–412. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FAWCETT D. W. SURFACE SPECIALIZATIONS OF ABSORBING CELLS. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965 Feb;13:75–91. doi: 10.1177/13.2.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Farquhar M. G., Palade G. E. Cell junctions in amphibian skin. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jul;26(1):263–291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fawcett D. W., McNutt N. S. The ultrastructure of the cat myocardium. I. Ventricular papillary muscle. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jul;42(1):1–45. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Furshpan E. J., Potter D. D. Low-resistance junctions between cells in embryos and tissue culture. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1968;3:95–127. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60352-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GIUDICE G. Restitution of whole larvae from disaggregated cells of sea urchin embryos. Dev Biol. 1962 Dec;5:402–411. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(62)90021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. García-Bellido A. Pattern reconstruction by dissociated imaginal disk cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1966 Oct;14(2):278–306. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(66)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HAY E. D. Fine structure of an unusual intracellular supporting network in the Leydig cells of Amblystoma epidermis. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Jul;10:457–463. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.3.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HUMPHREYS T. CHEMICAL DISSOLUTION AND IN VITRO RECONSTRUCTION OF SPONGE CELL ADHESIONS. I. ISOLATION AND FUNCTIONAL DEMONSTRATION OF THE COMPONENTS INVOLVED. Dev Biol. 1963 Aug;8:27–47. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(63)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hermans C. O., Cloney R. A. Fine structure of the prostomial eyes of Armandia brevis (Polychaeta: Opheliidae). Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1966;72(4):583–596. doi: 10.1007/BF00319262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heuser J. E., Doggenweiler C. F. The fine structural organization of nerve fibers, sheaths, and glial cells in the prawn, Palaemonetes vulgaris. J Cell Biol. 1966 Aug;30(2):381–403. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.2.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hilfer S. R., Iszard L. B., Hilfer E. K. Follicle formation in the embryonic chick thyroid. II. Reorganization after dissociation. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1968;92(2):256–269. doi: 10.1007/BF00335651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. ITO S., WINCHESTER R. J. The fine structure of the gastric mucosa in the bat. J Cell Biol. 1963 Mar;16:541–577. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.3.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. IURATO S. Submicroscopic structure of the membranous labyrinth. 2. The epithelium of Corti's organ. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1961;53:259–298. doi: 10.1007/BF00339444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Knoth M. Ultrastructure of chorionic villi from a four-somite human embryo. J Ultrastruct Res. 1968 Dec;25(5):423–440. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(68)80096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. LESSEPS R. J. CELL SURFACE PROJECTIONS: THEIR ROLE IN THE AGGREGATION OF EMBRYONIC CHICK CELLS AS REVEALED BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Exp Zool. 1963 Jul;153:171–182. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401530209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lilien J. E. Specific enhancement of cell aggregation in vitro. Dev Biol. 1968 Jun;17(6):657–678. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(68)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of membrane junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):441–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. MOSCONA A., MOSCONA H. The dissociation and aggregation of cells from organ rudiments of the early chick embryo. J Anat. 1952 Jul;86(3):287–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maclennan A. P., Dodd R. Y. Promoting activity of extracellular materials on sponge cell reaggregation. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1967 Jun;17(3):473–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Millonig G., Giudice G. Electron microscopic study of the reaggregation of cells dissociated from sea urchin embryos. Dev Biol. 1967 Feb;15(2):91–101. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moscona A. A. Cell aggregation: properties of specific cell-ligands and their role in the formation of multicellular systems. Dev Biol. 1968 Sep;18(3):250–277. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(68)90035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Moscona A. A. STUDIES ON CELL AGGREGATION: DEMONSTRATION OF MATERIALS WITH SELECTIVE CELL-BINDING ACTIVITY. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 May;49(5):742–747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.49.5.742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moscona A. THE DEVELOPMENT IN VITRO OF CHIMERIC AGGREGATES OF DISSOCIATED EMBRYONIC CHICK AND MOUSE CELLS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1957 Jan 15;43(1):184–194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.43.1.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. OVERTON J. Desmosome development in normal and reassociating cells in the early chick blastoderm. Dev Biol. 1962 Jun;4:532–548. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(62)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Overton J. A fibrillar intercellular material between reaggregating embryonic chick cells. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jan;40(1):136–143. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.1.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pannese E. Electron microscopical study on the development of the satellite cell sheath in spinal ganglia. J Comp Neurol. 1969 Apr;135(4):381–422. doi: 10.1002/cne.901350403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Potter D. D., Furshpan E. J., Lennox E. S. Connections between cells of the developing squid as revealed by electrophysiological methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Feb;55(2):328–336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.2.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. ROTH T. F., PORTER K. R. YOLK PROTEIN UPTAKE IN THE OOCYTE OF THE MOSQUITO AEDES AEGYPTI. L. J Cell Biol. 1964 Feb;20:313–332. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.2.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rambourg A., Leblond C. P. Electron microscope observations on the carbohydrate-rich cell coat present at the surface of cells in the rat. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jan;32(1):27–53. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rhodin J. A. The ultrastructure of mammalian arterioles and precapillary sphincters. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Apr;18(1):181–223. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80239-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rifkind R. A., Chui D., Epler H. An ultrastructural study of early morphogenetic events during the establishment of fetal hepatic erythropoiesis. J Cell Biol. 1969 Feb;40(2):343–365. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Roth S. A., Weston J. A. The measurement of intercellular adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Sep;58(3):974–980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.3.974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Roth S. Studies on intercellular adhesive selectivity. Dev Biol. 1968 Dec;18(6):602–631. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(68)90029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. STEINBERG M. S. "ECM": its nature, origin and function in cell aggregation. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Apr;30:257–279. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90299-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. STEINBERG M. S. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. Science. 1963 Aug 2;141(3579):401–408. doi: 10.1126/science.141.3579.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sheridan J. D. Electrophysiological evidence for low-resistance intercellular junctions in the early chick embryo. J Cell Biol. 1968 Jun;37(3):650–659. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.3.650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. TRINKAUS J. P. Behavior of dissociated retinal pigment cells in heterotypic cell aggregates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Feb 15;100:413–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb57134.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. TRINKAUS J. P., GROSS M. C. The use of tritiated thymidine for marking migratory cells. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Jun;24:52–57. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90246-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. TRINKAUS J. P., LENTZ J. P. DIRECT OBSERVATION OF TYPE-SPECIFIC SEGREGATION IN MIXED CELL AGGREGATES. Dev Biol. 1964 Feb;9:115–136. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(64)90017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Taylor A. C. Microtubules in the microspikes and cortical cytoplasm of isolated cells. J Cell Biol. 1966 Feb;28(2):155–168. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.2.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Trelstad R. L., Hay E. D., Revel J. D. Cell contact during early morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1967 Jul;16(1):78–106. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. WHITTAKER J. R. CHANGES IN MELANOGENESIS DURING THE DEDIFFERENTIATION OF CHICK RETINAL PIGMENT CELLS IN CELL CULTURE. Dev Biol. 1963 Aug;8:99–127. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(63)90028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Weiss P., Taylor A. C. RECONSTITUTION OF COMPLETE ORGANS FROM SINGLE-CELL SUSPENSIONS OF CHICK EMBRYOS IN ADVANCED STAGES OF DIFFERENTIATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1960 Sep;46(9):1177–1185. doi: 10.1073/pnas.46.9.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zacks S. I., Saito A. Uptake of exogenous horseradish peroxidase by coated vesicles in mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Histochem Cytochem. 1969 Mar;17(3):161–170. doi: 10.1177/17.3.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES