Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1970 Oct 1;47(1):107–119. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.107

RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN RAT SKELETAL MUSCLE FIBERS

S Schiaffino 1, Věra Hanzlíková 1, Sandra Pierobon 1
PMCID: PMC2108409  PMID: 5513549

Abstract

The fast-twitch extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and the slow-twitch soleus muscle of the rat consist of heterogeneous fiber populations. EDL muscle fibers differ in size, mitochondrial content, myoglobin concentration, and thickness of the Z line. The sarcoplasmic reticulum, on the other hand, is richly developed in all fibers, with only small variation. Myofibrils are clearly circumscribed at both the A and I band level. The soleus muscle is composed primarily of fibers with moderate mitochondrial content and myoglobin concentration. In most fibers the sarcoplasmic reticulum is poorly developed, with the exception of the portion of reticulum in phase with the Z line. As a consequence the myofibrillar fields are amply fused together. Contacts between sarcoplasmic reticulum and T system are discontinuous and may occur in the form of "dyads" instead of the typical triad structure. In a small proportion of soleus muscle fibers the organization and development of the sarcoplasmic reticulum is similar to that of EDL muscle fibers, with prominent fenestrated collars at the H band level. In these fibers mitochondria are larger and more abundant. The results are correlated with physiological studies on motor units in the same and in similar rat muscles. It is suggested that the variable structural pattern of rat muscle fibers is related to two distinct physiological parameters, speed of contraction and resistance to fatigue.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bárány M. ATPase activity of myosin correlated with speed of muscle shortening. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):197–218. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.6.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Close R. Properties of motor units in fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(1):45–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies R. E., Goldspink G., Larson R. E. ATP utilization by fast and slow muscles during the development and maintenance of isometric tension. J Physiol. 1970 Feb;206(2):28P–29P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edström L., Kugelberg E. Histochemical composition, distribution of fibres and fatiguability of single motor units. Anterior tibial muscle of the rat. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):424–433. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edström L., Kugelberg E. Histochemical mapping of motor units in experimentally re-innervated skeletal muscle. Experientia. 1969 Oct 15;25(10):1044–1045. doi: 10.1007/BF01901417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farquhar M. G., Palade G. E. Cell junctions in amphibian skin. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jul;26(1):263–291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gauthier G. F. On the relationship of ultrastructural and cytochemical features of color in mammalian skeletal muscle. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;95(3):462–482. doi: 10.1007/BF00995217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gauthier G. F., Padykula H. A. Cytological studies of fiber types in skeletal muscle. A comparative study of the mammalian diaphragm. J Cell Biol. 1966 Feb;28(2):333–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.2.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guth L., Samaha F. J. Qualitative differences between actomyosin ATPase of slow and fast mammalian muscle. Exp Neurol. 1969 Sep;25(1):138–152. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(69)90077-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HENNEMAN E., OLSON C. B. RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE DESIGN OF SKELETAL MUSCLES. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:581–598. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall-Craggs E. C. The contraction times and enzyme activity of two rabbit laryngeal muscles. J Anat. 1968 Jan;102(Pt 2):241–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. James N. T. Histochemical demonstration of myoglobin in skeletal muscle fibres and muscle spindles. Nature. 1968 Sep 14;219(5159):1174–1175. doi: 10.1038/2191174a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karpati G., Engel W. K. "Type grouping" in skeletal muscles after experimental reinnervation. Neurology. 1968 May;18(5):447–455. doi: 10.1212/wnl.18.5.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kugelberg E., Edström L. Differential histochemical effects of muscle contractions on phosphorylase and glycogen in various types of fibres: relation to fatigue. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):415–423. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. NACHLAS M. M., TSOU K. C., DE SOUZA E., CHENG C. S., SELIGMAN A. M. Cytochemical demonstration of succinic dehydrogenase by the use of a new p-nitrophenyl substituted ditetrazole. J Histochem Cytochem. 1957 Jul;5(4):420–436. doi: 10.1177/5.4.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Page S. G. A comparison of the fine structures of frog slow and twitch muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1965 Aug;26(2):477–497. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Page S. G. Fine structure of tortoise skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):709–715. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Page S. G. Structure and some contractile properties of fast and slow muscles of the chicken. J Physiol. 1969 Nov;205(1):131–145. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peachey L. D. Muscle. Annu Rev Physiol. 1968;30:401–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.30.030168.002153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. REVEL J. P. The sarcoplasmic reticulum of the bat cricothroid muscle. J Cell Biol. 1962 Mar;12:571–588. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.3.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. ROMANUL F. C. ENZYMES IN MUSCLE. I. HISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF ENZYMES IN INDIVIDUAL MUSCLE FIBERS. Arch Neurol. 1964 Oct;11:355–358. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1964.00460220017003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. STEIN J. M., PADYKULA H. A. Histochemical classification of individual skeletal muscle fibers of the rat. Am J Anat. 1962 Mar;110:103–123. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001100203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weibel E. R., Kistler G. S., Scherle W. F. Practical stereological methods for morphometric cytology. J Cell Biol. 1966 Jul;30(1):23–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES