Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1970 Oct 1;47(1):140–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.140

A CYTOLOGICAL STUDY OF ARTIFICIAL PARTHENOGENESIS IN THE SEA URCHIN ARBACIA PUNCTULATA

Martin I Sachs 1, Everett Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC2108410  PMID: 4327513

Abstract

Eggs of the sea urchin Arbacia punctulata were artificially activated with hypertonic seawater. The artificially activated eggs undergo the cortical reaction which is not distinguished by a wavelike progression as in the case of inseminated eggs. The cortical granules are released at random loci at the surface of the egg and result in spaces separated by large cytoplasmic projections. Unreacted cortical granules and ribosomes are found within the matrix comprising the large cytoplasmic projections. No "fertilization cone" is formed. The subsequent release of additional cortical granules results in the formation of a continuous perivitelline space, 15 min following activation. 85 min postactivation, an organization of annulate lamellae, endoplasmic reticulum of the smooth variety, and microtubules around a centriole is observed prior to nuclear division. Before the breakdown of the nuclear envelope a streak stage is formed. The streak is composed of a central core of annulate lamellae and is encompassed by endoplasmic reticulum and vesicular components. Condensation of chromatin is followed by the establishment of the mitotic apparatus. Centrioles were not found in the mature egg; however, they are present after activation prior to the first nuclear division, in the four-cell embryo, multicellular embryo, and at blastula. Artificially activated eggs have been observed to develop to the pluteus stage in more than 50% of the eggs treated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson E. Oocyte differentiation in the sea urchin, Arbacia punctulata, with particular reference to the origin of cortical granules and their participation in the cortical reaction. J Cell Biol. 1968 May;37(2):514–539. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.2.514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson E. The formation of the primary envelope during oocyte differentiation in teleosts. J Cell Biol. 1967 Oct;35(1):193–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.35.1.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DEYRUP I. A study of the fluid uptake of rat kidney slices in vitro. J Gen Physiol. 1953 Jul;36(6):739–749. doi: 10.1085/jgp.36.6.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DIRKSEN E. R. THE ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ASTERS FROM ARTIFICIALLY ACTIVATED SEA URCHIN EGGS. Exp Cell Res. 1964 Nov;36:256–269. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(64)90206-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DIRKSEN E. R. The presence of centrioles in artificially activated sea urchin eggs. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Oct;11:244–247. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.1.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dingle A. D., Fulton C. Development of the flagellar apparatus of Naegleria. J Cell Biol. 1966 Oct;31(1):43–54. doi: 10.1083/jcb.31.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ENDO Y. Changes in the cortical layer of sea urchin eggs at fertilization as studied with the electron microscope. I. Clypeaster japonicus. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Nov;25:383–397. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90288-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FELDHERR C. M., MARSHALL J. M., Jr The use of colloidal gold for studies of intracellular exchanges in the ameba Chaos chaos. J Cell Biol. 1962 Mar;12:640–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.3.640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FELDHERR C. M. The intracellular distribution of ferritin following microinjection. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jan;12:159–167. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gurdon J. B. Changes in somatic cell nuclei inserted into growing and maturing amphibian oocytes. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1968 Nov;20(3):401–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gurdon J. B., Woodland H. R. The cytoplasmic control of nuclear activity in animal development. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1968 May;43(2):233–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1968.tb00960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HARRIS P. Electron microscope study of mitosis in sea urchin blastomeres. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Nov;11:419–431. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.2.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HARRIS P. SOME OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING METAKINESIS IN SEA URCHIN EGGS. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:77. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanai T., Haydon D. A., Redwood W. R. The water permeability of artificial bimolecular leaflets: a comparison of radio-tracer and osmotic methods. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):731–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50194.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harris H., Sidebottom E., Grace D. M., Bramwell M. E. The expression of genetic information: a study with hybrid animal cells. J Cell Sci. 1969 Mar;4(2):499–525. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.2.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Horowitz S. B., Fenichel I. R. Analysis of glycerol-3H transport in the frog oocyte by extractive and radioautographic techniques. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Jun;51(6):703–730. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.6.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang C., Thompson T. E. Properties of lipid bilayer membranes separating two aqueous phases: water permeability. J Mol Biol. 1966 Feb;15(2):539–554. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80126-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. ITO S., WINCHESTER R. J. The fine structure of the gastric mucosa in the bat. J Cell Biol. 1963 Mar;16:541–577. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.3.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. LEAF A. On the mechanism of fluid exchange of tissues in vitro. Biochem J. 1956 Feb;62(2):241–248. doi: 10.1042/bj0620241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lezzi M. Induktion eines Ecdyson-aktivierbaren Puff in isolierten Zellkernen von Chironomus durch KCL. Exp Cell Res. 1966 Oct;43(3):571–577. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(66)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ling G. N., Ochsenfeld M. M., Karreman G. Is the cell membrane a universal rate-limiting barrier to the movement of water between the living cell and its surrounding medium? J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6):1807–1820. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.6.1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Loewenstein W. R., Kanno Y., Ito S. Permeability of nuclear membranes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):708–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of a nuclear membrane: changes during normal development and changes induced by growth hormone. Science. 1965 Nov 12;150(3698):909–910. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3698.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Longo F. J., Anderson E. Cytological events leading to the formation of the two-cell stage in the rabbit: association of the maternally and paternally derived genomes. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969 Oct;29(1):86–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)80058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Longo F. J., Anderson E. The fine structure of pronuclear development and fusion in the sea urchin, Arbacia punctulata. J Cell Biol. 1968 Nov;39(2):339–368. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lovtrup S. On the rate of water exchange across the surface of animal cells. J Theor Biol. 1963 Nov;5(3):341–359. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90082-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McClendon J. F. ON ARTIFICIAL PARTHENOGENESIS OF THE SEA-URCHIN EGG. Science. 1909 Oct 1;30(770):454–455. doi: 10.1126/science.30.770.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mizukami I., Gall J. Centriole replication. II. Sperm formation in the fern, Marsilea, and the cycad, Zamia. J Cell Biol. 1966 Apr;29(1):97–111. doi: 10.1083/jcb.29.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mueller P., Rudin D. O. Resting and action potentials in experimental bimolecular lipid membranes. J Theor Biol. 1968 Feb;18(2):222–258. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(68)90163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. NAORA H., NAORA H., IZAWA M., ALLFREY V. G., MIRSKY A. E. Some observations on differences in composition between the nucleus and cytoplasm of the frog oocyte. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 May 15;48:853–859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.5.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. OHNISHI T. Adenosine triphosphatase activity relating to active transport in the cortex of sea urchin eggs. J Biochem. 1963 Mar;53:238–241. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a127685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. PRESCOTT D. M., ZEUTHEN E. Comparison of water diffusion and water filtration across cell surfaces. Acta Physiol Scand. 1953 Mar 31;28(1):77–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1953.tb00960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. ROBBINS E., GONATAS N. K. THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF A MAMMALIAN CELL DURING THE MITOTIC CYCLE. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:429–463. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Riemann W., Muir C., Macgregor H. C. Sodium and potassium in oocytes of Triturus cristatus. J Cell Sci. 1969 Mar;4(2):299–304. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Robbins E., Jentzsch G., Micali A. The centriole cycle in synchronized HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 1968 Feb;36(2):329–339. doi: 10.1083/jcb.36.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. SCHUSTER F. AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY OF THE AMOEBO-FLAGELLATE, NAEGLERIA GRUBERI (SCHARDINGER). I. THE AMOEBOID AND FLAGELLATE STAGES. J Protozool. 1963 Aug;10:297–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1963.tb01681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. SUBTELNY S., BRADT C. Cytological observations on the early developmental stages of activated Rana pipiens eggs receiving a transplanted blastula nucleus. J Morphol. 1963 Jan;112:45–59. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051120105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. SZOLLOSI D. THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF CENTRIOLES AND THEIR SATELLITES IN THE JELLYFISH PHIALIDIUM GREGARIUM. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:465–479. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. THEG D. E. CYTOPLASMIC MICROTUBULES IN DIFFERENT ANIMAL CELLS. J Cell Biol. 1964 Nov;23:265–275. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.2.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. USSING H. H. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OSMOTIC REACTIONS AND ACTIVE SODIUM TRANSPORT IN THE FROG SKIN EPITHELIUM. Acta Physiol Scand. 1965 Jan-Feb;63:141–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04052.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. VENABLE J. H., COGGESHALL R. A SIMPLIFIED LEAD CITRATE STAIN FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1965 May;25:407–408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.2.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. WHITTAM R. The asymmetrical stimulation of a membrane adenosine triphosphatase in relation to active cation transport. Biochem J. 1962 Jul;84:110–118. doi: 10.1042/bj0840110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES