Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1990 Dec;172(12):7179–7187. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.12.7179-7187.1990

Effects of glutamines and glutamates at sites of covalent modification of a methyl-accepting transducer.

C Park 1, D P Dutton 1, G L Hazelbauer 1
PMCID: PMC210843  PMID: 2254280

Abstract

Chemotactic transducer proteins of Escherichia coli contain four or five methyl-accepting glutamates that are crucial for sensory adaptation and gradient sensing. Two residues arise from posttranslational deamidation of glutamines to yield methyl-accepting glutamates. We addressed the significance of this arrangement by creating two mutated trg genes: trg(5E), coding for a transducer in which all five modification sites were synthesized as glutamates, and trg(5Q), in which all five were glutamines. We found that the normal (3E,2Q) configuration was not an absolute requirement for synthesis, assembly, or stable maintenance of transducers. Both mutant proteins were methylated, although Trg(5Q) had a reduced number of methyl-accepting sites because two glutamines at adjacent residues were blocked for deamidation and thus could not become methyl-accepting glutamates. The glutamine-glutamate balance had striking effects on signaling state. Trg(5E) was in a strong counterclockwise signaling configuration, and Trg(5Q) was in a strong clockwise signaling induced by ligand binding, and alanines substituted at modification sites had an intermediate effect. Chemotactic migration by growing cells containing trg(5E) or trg(5Q) exhibited reduced effectiveness, probably reflecting perturbations of the counterclockwise/clockwise ratio caused by newly synthesized transducers not modified rapidly enough to produce a balanced signaling state during growth. These defects were evident for cells in which other transducers were not available to contribute to balanced signaling or were present at lower levels than the mutant proteins.

Full text

PDF
7179

Images in this article

7181Image
on p.7181
7183Image
on p.7183
7184Image
on p.7184
7184Image
on p.7184
7185Image
on p.7185

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bollinger J., Park C., Harayama S., Hazelbauer G. L. Structure of the Trg protein: Homologies with and differences from other sensory transducers of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(11):3287–3291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.11.3287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borkovich K. A., Kaplan N., Hess J. F., Simon M. I. Transmembrane signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves ligand-dependent activation of phosphate group transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1208–1212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd A., Simon M. I. Multiple electrophoretic forms of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins generated by stimulus-elicited methylation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1980 Aug;143(2):809–815. doi: 10.1128/jb.143.2.809-815.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burrows G. G., Newcomer M. E., Hazelbauer G. L. Purification of receptor protein Trg by exploiting a property common to chemotactic transducers of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1989 Oct 15;264(29):17309–17315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chelsky D., Dahlquist F. W. Structural studies of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of Escherichia coli: evidence for multiple methylation sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 May;77(5):2434–2438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarke S., Koshland D. E., Jr Membrane receptors for aspartate and serine in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1979 Oct 10;254(19):9695–9702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeFranco A. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Multiple methylation in processing of sensory signals during bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 May;77(5):2429–2433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Engström P., Hazelbauer G. L. Multiple methylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins during adaptation of E. coli to chemical stimuli. Cell. 1980 May;20(1):165–171. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90244-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hazelbauer G. L., Engström P. Multiple forms of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins distinguished by a factor in addition to multiple methylation. J Bacteriol. 1981 Jan;145(1):35–42. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.1.35-42.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hazelbauer G. L., Harayama S. Mutants in transmission of chemotactic signals from two independent receptors of E. coli. Cell. 1979 Mar;16(3):617–625. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hazelbauer G. L., Harayama S. Sensory transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. Int Rev Cytol. 1983;81:33–70. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62334-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hazelbauer G. L., Park C., Nowlin D. M. Adaptational "crosstalk" and the crucial role of methylation in chemotactic migration by Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(5):1448–1452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hazelbauer G. L. The bacterial chemosensory system. Can J Microbiol. 1988 Apr;34(4):466–474. doi: 10.1139/m88-080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Imae Y., Mizuno T., Maeda K. Chemosensory and thermosensory excitation in adaptation-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1984 Jul;159(1):368–374. doi: 10.1128/jb.159.1.368-374.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kehry M. R., Bond M. W., Hunkapiller M. W., Dahlquist F. W. Enzymatic deamidation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli catalyzed by the cheB gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jun;80(12):3599–3603. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.12.3599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kehry M. R., Dahlquist F. W. Adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis: CheB-dependent modification permits additional methylations of sensory transducer proteins. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):761–772. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kehry M. R., Dahlquist F. W. The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of Escherichia coli. Identification of the multiple methylation sites on methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I. J Biol Chem. 1982 Sep 10;257(17):10378–10386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kehry M. R., Engström P., Dahlquist F. W., Hazelbauer G. L. Multiple covalent modifications of Trg, a sensory transducer of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1983 Apr 25;258(8):5050–5055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kondoh H., Ball C. B., Adler J. Identification of a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein for the ribose and galactose chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):260–264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Manson M. D., Blank V., Brade G., Higgins C. F. Peptide chemotaxis in E. coli involves the Tap signal transducer and the dipeptide permease. Nature. 1986 May 15;321(6067):253–256. doi: 10.1038/321253a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nowlin D. M., Bollinger J., Hazelbauer G. L. Site-directed mutations altering methyl-accepting residues of a sensory transducer protein. Proteins. 1988;3(2):102–112. doi: 10.1002/prot.340030205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nowlin D. M., Bollinger J., Hazelbauer G. L. Sites of covalent modification in Trg, a sensory transducer of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1987 May 5;262(13):6039–6045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Park C., Hazelbauer G. L. Mutations specifically affecting ligand interaction of the Trg chemosensory transducer. J Bacteriol. 1986 Jul;167(1):101–109. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.101-109.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Parkinson J. S., Houts S. E. Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions. J Bacteriol. 1982 Jul;151(1):106–113. doi: 10.1128/jb.151.1.106-113.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rollins C., Dahlquist F. W. The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of E. coli: a repellent-stimulated, covalent modification, distinct from methylation. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):333–340. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sager B. M., Sekelsky J. J., Matsumura P., Adler J. Use of a computer to assay motility in bacteria. Anal Biochem. 1988 Sep;173(2):271–277. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90189-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Segall J. E., Block S. M., Berg H. C. Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):8987–8991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sherris D., Parkinson J. S. Posttranslational processing of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6051–6055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Snyder M. A., Stock J. B., Koshland D. E., Jr Carboxylmethyl esterase of bacterial chemotaxis. Methods Enzymol. 1984;106:321–330. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(84)06032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Springer M. S., Goy M. F., Adler J. Protein methylation in behavioural control mechanisms and in signal transduction. Nature. 1979 Jul 26;280(5720):279–284. doi: 10.1038/280279a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stock J. B., Clarke S., Koshland D. E., Jr The protein carboxylmethyltransferase involved in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium chemotaxis. Methods Enzymol. 1984;106:310–321. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(84)06031-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Terwilliger T. C., Wang J. Y., Koshland D. E., Jr Kinetics of receptor modification. The multiply methylated aspartate receptors involved in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1986 Aug 15;261(23):10814–10820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weis R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr Reversible receptor methylation is essential for normal chemotaxis of Escherichia coli in gradients of aspartic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(1):83–87. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yamamoto K., Macnab R. M., Imae Y. Repellent response functions of the Trg and Tap chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jan;172(1):383–388. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.1.383-388.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yonekawa H., Hayashi H., Parkinson J. S. Requirement of the cheB function for sensory adaptation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1983 Dec;156(3):1228–1235. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.3.1228-1235.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES