Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1972 Feb 1;52(2):438–452. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.2.438

DIFFERENTIATION OF ANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS IN TOAD SPLEEN

A Study Using Density and Sedimentation Velocity Cell Separation

N Kraft 1, Ken Shortman 1
PMCID: PMC2108628  PMID: 4621651

Abstract

Antibody-forming cells (AFC), developing in toad spleen after stimulation with polymerized flagellin, were studied with an immune adherence assay. Differentiation was followed by several parameters: thymidine uptake to monitor dividing cells; equilibrium density centrifugation in albumin gradients to monitor cell density; microscopic measurements and sedimentation velocity separation to monitor cell size; stained preparations to follow cell morphology. Almost all AFC observed early in the response were dividing cells; the proportion of dividing AFC dropped to 4% 2 wk after stimulation. The earliest AFC detected (3 days) formed a relatively homogeneous light density population, and were purified 17-fold by equilibrium density centrifugation. As the response developed, additional denser peaks were found, so that late in the response dense AFC predominated. Dividing AFC were confined to the light density region throughout the response. Cell diameter measurements revealed that the earliest AFC were all very large cells. In a manner analogous to the density changes, smaller AFC appeared as the response developed until they finally comprised the majority of the AFC population. Dividing AFC were always relatively large, but encompassed a wide range of sizes. Sedimentation velocity separation was employed in a closer study of the immature AFC; they were purified 140-fold by this procedure. The earliest AFC consisted of several readily separable size populations in the range 9–18 µ diameter. The presence of separate peaks related by factors of two in volume suggested that the largest cells undergo a series of halving divisions before entering a division growth cycle. The results suggest an AFC differentiation sequence from a very large, light density, dividing "blast" cell to a nondividing cell with the size, density, and morphological appearance of a small lymphocyte. Stages of this sequence can be defined and selected out for investigation, using sedimentation velocity and equilibrium density centrifugation as complementary techniques.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,003.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADA G. L., NOSSAL G. J., PYE J., ABBOT A. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. I. PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF FLAGELLAR ANTIGENS FROM SALMONELLA ADELAIDE. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:267–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avrameas S., Leduc E. H. Detection of simultaneous antibody synthesis in plasma cells and specialized lymphocytes in rabbit lymph nodes. J Exp Med. 1970 Jun 1;131(6):1137–1168. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.6.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cowden R. B., Dyer R. F., Gebhardt B. M., Volpe E. P. Amphibian plasma cells. J Immunol. 1968 Jun;100(6):1293–1295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diener E. A new method for the enumeration of single antibody-producing cells. J Immunol. 1968 May;100(5):1062–1070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diener E., Armstrong W. D. Induction of antibody formation and tolerance in vitro to a purified protein antigen. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1281–1285. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90394-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diener E., Marchalonis J. Cellular and humoral aspects of the primary immune response of the toad, Bufo marinus. Immunology. 1970 Feb;18(2):279–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diener E., Nossal G. J. Phylogenetic studies on the immune response. I. Localization of antigens and immune response in the toad, Bufo marinus. Immunology. 1966 Jun;10(6):535–542. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorczynski R. M., Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Homogeneity of antibody-producing cells as analysed by their buoyant density in gradients of Ficoll. Immunology. 1970 Nov;19(5):817–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haskill J. S., Legge D. G., Shortman K. Density distribution analysis of cells forming 19S hemolytic antibody in the rat. J Immunol. 1969 Mar;102(3):703–712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hulliger L., Blazkovec A. A. A simple and efficient method of separating peripheral-blood leucocytes for in-vitro studies. Lancet. 1967 Jun 17;1(7503):1304–1305. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)91596-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JERNE N. K., NORDIN A. A. Plaque formation in agar by single antibody-producing cells. Science. 1963 Apr 26;140(3565):405–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kraft N., Shortman K., Marchalonis J. Density distribution analysis of a primary antibody forming cell response. Immunology. 1971 Jun;20(6):919–930. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kraft N., Wistar R. A modified antibody forming cell assay for detecting cells producing a particular class of antibody. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1971 Feb;49(1):11–20. doi: 10.1038/icb.1971.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lang W., Nase S., Rajewsky K. Inhibition of the immune response in vitro to sheep red blood cells by passive antibody. Nature. 1969 Aug 30;223(5209):949–950. doi: 10.1038/223949a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Legge D. G., Shortman K. The effect of pH on the volume, density and shape of erythrocytes and thymic lymphocytes. Br J Haematol. 1968 Mar;14(3):323–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1968.tb01503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MAKELA O., NOSSAL G. J. Autoradiographic studies on the immune response. II. DNA synthesis amongst single antibody-producing cells. J Exp Med. 1962 Jan 1;115:231–244. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.1.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MAKELA O., NOSSAL G. J. Bacterial adherence: a method for detecting antibody production by single cells. J Immunol. 1961 Oct;87:447–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MAKELA O., NOSSAL G. J. Study of antibody-producing capacity of single cells by bacterial adherence and immobilization. J Immunol. 1961 Oct;87:457–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mage M. G., Evans W. H., Peterson E. A. Enrichment of antibody plaque-forming cells of spleen by sedimentation at unit gravity. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Feb;127(2):478–481. doi: 10.3181/00379727-127-32719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Marbrook J. Primary immune response in cultures of spleen cells. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1279–1281. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90393-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Merchant B., Hraba T. Lymphoid cells producing antibody against simple haptens: detection and enumeration. Science. 1966 Jun 3;152(3727):1378–1379. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3727.1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Separation of cells by velocity sedimentation. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Jun;73(3):191–201. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040730305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of normal mouse spleen cell suspensions in vitro. Science. 1966 Aug 26;153(3739):1004–1006. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3739.1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. NOSSAL G. J., MITCHELL J., MCDONALD W. AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES ON THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. 4. SINGLE CELL STUDIES ON THE PRIMARY RESPONSE. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1963 Aug;41:SUPPL423–SUPPL435. doi: 10.1038/icb.1963.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peterson E. A., Evans W. H. Separation of bone marrow cells by sedimentation at unit gravity. Nature. 1967 May 20;214(5090):824–825. doi: 10.1038/214824a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Phillips R. A., Miller R. G. Antibody-producing cells: analysis and purification by velocity sedimentation. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970 Jul;3(3):263–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1970.tb00271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. ROWLEY D. A., FITCH F. W. HOMEOSTASIS OF ANTIBODY FORMATION IN THE ADULT RAT. J Exp Med. 1964 Dec 1;120:987–1005. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.6.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Russell P. J., Diener E. The early antibody-forming response to Salmonella antigens. A study of morphology and kinetics in vivo and in vitro. Immunology. 1970 Oct;19(4):651–667. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shortman K. The density distribution of thymus, thoracic duct and spleen lymphocytes. J Cell Physiol. 1971 Jun;77(3):319–330. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040770306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shortman K. The separation of different cell classes from lymphoid organs. II. The purification and analysis of lymphocyte populations by equilibrium density gradient centrifugation. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1968 Aug;46(4):375–396. doi: 10.1038/icb.1968.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wortis H. H., Taylor R. B., Dresser D. W. Antibody production studied by means of the LHG assay. I. The splenic response of CBA mice to sheep erythrocytes. Immunology. 1966 Dec;11(6):603–616. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES