Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1972 Mar 1;52(3):577–588. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.3.577

STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF THE EPITHELIO-MESENCHYMAL INTERFACE OF RAT DUODENAL MUCOSA DURING DEVELOPMENT

Minnie Mathan 1, John A Hermos 1, Jerry S Trier 1
PMCID: PMC2108648  PMID: 5009520

Abstract

In fetal rats 5–7 days before birth, the duodenal epithelium is separated from mesenchymal cells by a well-defined basal lamina. By 3–4 days before birth, when small rudimentary villi are first seen, direct contact between epithelial and mesenchymal cells occurs by means of epithelial cell cytoplasmic processes which project through gaps in the basal lamina into the lamina propria. At contact sites, the epithelial and mesenchymal cell plasma membranes were less than 100 A apart but membrane fusion was not seen. In number and size these epithelial cell processes increase strikingly during the last 2 days of gestation, and they persist in large numbers until 7–10 days after birth. Thereafter, they decrease gradually in both number and size until 3–4 wk after birth, when the morphology of the epithelio-mesenchymal interface resembles that seen in adult rats, i.e., there are only rare epithelial cell processes which penetrate deeply into the lamina propria. The presence of a large number of epithelio-mesenchymal contact sites during the period of rapid growth and differentiation of duodenal mucosa may reflect epithelio-mesenchymal cell interactions which may facilitate the maturation of the duodenal mucosa.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASHWORTH C. T., STEMBRIDGE V. A., LUIBEL F. J. Symposium on probable or possible malignant cervical lesions - carcinoma in situ. I. Histology of carcinoma in situ. A study of basement membranes of normal epithelium, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of uterine cervix utilizing electron microscopy and histochemical methods. Acta Cytol. 1961 Sep-Oct;5:369–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BORGHESE E. Explantation experiments on the influence of the connective tissue capsule on the development of the epithelial part of the submandibular gland of Mus musculus. J Anat. 1950 Jul;84(3):303–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernfield M. R. Collagen synthesis during epitheliomesenchymal interactions. Dev Biol. 1970 Jun;22(2):213–231. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(70)90151-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CLARK S. L., Jr The ingestion of proteins and colloidal materials by columnar absorptive cells of the small intestine in suckling rats and mice. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Jan 25;5(1):41–50. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FISHER E. R., SHARKEY D. A. The ultrastructure of colonic polyps and cancer with special reference to the epithelial inclusion bodies of Leuchtenberger. Cancer. 1962 Jan-Feb;15:160–170. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196201/02)15:1<160::aid-cncr2820150122>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FREI J. V. The fine structure of the basement membrane in epidermal tumors. J Cell Biol. 1962 Nov;15:335–342. doi: 10.1083/jcb.15.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GOLOSOW N., GROBSTEIN C. Epitheliomesenchymal interaction in pancreatic morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 1962 Apr;4:242–255. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(62)90042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GROBSTEIN C. Some transmission characteristics of the tubule-inducing influence on mouse metanephrogenic mesenchyme. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Dec;13(3):575–587. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90087-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GROBSTEIN C. Trans-filter induction of tubules in mouse metanephrogenic mesenchyme. Exp Cell Res. 1956 Apr;10(2):424–440. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(56)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grobstein C., Cohen J. Collagenase: effect on the morphogenesis of embryonic salivary epithelium in vitro. Science. 1965 Oct 29;150(3696):626–628. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3696.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grobstein C. Mechanisms of organogenetic tissue interaction. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1967 Sep;26:279–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. IMAI H., STEIN A. A. Ultrastructure of adenocarcinoma of the colon. Gastroenterology. 1963 Apr;44:410–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KALLMAN F., GROBSTEIN C. FINE STRUCTURE OF DIFFERENTIATING MOUSE PANCREATIC EXOCRINE CELLS IN TRANSFILTER CULTURE. J Cell Biol. 1964 Mar;20:399–413. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.3.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KALLMAN F., GROBSTEIN C. SOURCE OF COLLAGEN AT EPITHELIOMESENCHYMAL INTERFACES DURING INDUCTIVE INTERACTION. Dev Biol. 1965 Apr;11:169–183. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(65)90055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. KOCH W. E., CROBSTEIN C. Transmission of radioisotopically labeled materials during embryonic induction in vitro. Dev Biol. 1963 Mar;6:303–323. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(63)90126-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McLoughlin C. B. Mesenchymal influences on epithelial differentiation. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1963;17:359–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Muthukkaruppan V. Inductive tissue interaction in the development of the mouse lens in vitro. J Exp Zool. 1965 Jul;159(2):269–287. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401590210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. OVERTON J. Desmosome development in normal and reassociating cells in the early chick blastoderm. Dev Biol. 1962 Jun;4:532–548. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(62)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. PANNESE E. Observations on the ultrastructure of the enamel organ. III. Internal and external enamel epithelia. J Ultrastruct Res. 1962 Apr;6:186–204. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(62)90053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ROTH T. F., PORTER K. R. YOLK PROTEIN UPTAKE IN THE OOCYTE OF THE MOSQUITO AEDES AEGYPTI. L. J Cell Biol. 1964 Feb;20:313–332. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.2.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rifkind R. A., Chui D., Epler H. An ultrastructural study of early morphogenetic events during the establishment of fetal hepatic erythropoiesis. J Cell Biol. 1969 Feb;40(2):343–365. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rodewald R. Selective antibody transport in the proximal small intestine of the neonatal rat. J Cell Biol. 1970 Jun;45(3):635–640. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.3.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ross R., Odland G. Human wound repair. II. Inflammatory cells, epithelial-mesenchymal interrelations, and fibrogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1968 Oct;39(1):152–168. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.1.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Slavkin H. C., LeBaron R., Bringas P., Cameron J., Bavetta L. A. The fine structure of the extracellular matrix during epithelio-mesenchymal interactions in the rabbit embryonic incisor. Anat Rec. 1969 Oct;165(2):237–243. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091650209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. TRUMP B. F., SMUCKLER E. A., BENDITT E. P. A method for staining epoxy sections for light microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1961 Aug;5:343–348. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(61)80011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tarin D., Croft C. B. Ultrastructural studies of wound healing in mouse skin. II. Dermo-epidermal interrelationships. J Anat. 1970 Jan;106(Pt 1):79–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tarin D. Sequential electron microscopical study of experimental mouse skin carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer. 1967 May 15;2(3):195–211. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910020302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Toner P. G., Ferguson A. Intraepithelial cells in the human intestinal mucosa. J Ultrastruct Res. 1971 Feb;34(3):329–344. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(71)80076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Trelstad R. L., Hay E. D., Revel J. D. Cell contact during early morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1967 Jul;16(1):78–106. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. WATSON M. L. Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Jul 25;4(4):475–478. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.4.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wessells N. K., Cohen J. H. Effects of collagenase on developing epithelia in vitro: lung, ureteric bud, and pancreas. Dev Biol. 1968 Sep;18(3):294–309. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(68)90037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES