Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1972 May 1;53(2):561–573. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.2.561

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MAMMALIAN SPERM MOTILITY

David M Phillips 1
PMCID: PMC2108714  PMID: 5025110

Abstract

Spermatozoa of several mammalian species were studied by means of high-speed cinematography and electron microscopy. Three types of motile patterns were observed in mouse spermatozoa. The first type involved an asymmetrical beat which seemed to propel the sperm in circular paths. The second type involved rotation of the sperm and appeared to allow them to maintain straight paths. In the third type of pattern, the sperm appeared to move by crawling on surfaces in a snakelike manner. Spermatozoa of rabbit and Chinese hamster also had an asymmetrical beat which sometimes caused them to swim in circles. In spite of the asymmetry of the beat, these spermatozoa were also able to swim in straight paths by rotating around a central axis as they swam. Spermatozoa of some species appeared very flexible; their flagella formed arcs with a very small radius of curvature as they beat. Spermatozoa of other species appeared very stiff, and their flagella formed arcs with a very large radius of curvature. The stiffness of the spermatozoan appeared to correlate positively with the cross-sectional area of the dense fibers. This suggests that the dense fibers may be stiff elastic elements. Opossum sperm become paired as they pass through the epididymis. Pairs of opossum spermatozoa beat in a coordinated, alternating manner.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,012.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fawcett D. W. A comparative view of sperm ultrastructure. Biol Reprod Suppl. 1970;2:90–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fawcett D. W. The topographical relationship between the plane of the central pair of flagellar fibrils and the transverse axis of the head in guinea-pig spermatozoa. J Cell Sci. 1968 Jun;3(2):187–198. doi: 10.1242/jcs.3.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rikmenspoel R. The tail movement of bull spermatozoa. Observations and model calculations. Biophys J. 1965 Jul;5(4):365–392. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(65)86723-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SATIR P. STUDIES ON CILIA. THE FIXATION OF THE METACHRONAL WAVE. J Cell Biol. 1963 Aug;18:345–365. doi: 10.1083/jcb.18.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. VENABLE J. H., COGGESHALL R. A SIMPLIFIED LEAD CITRATE STAIN FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1965 May;25:407–408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.2.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yanagimachi R. The movement of golden hamster spermatozoa before and after capacitation. J Reprod Fertil. 1970 Oct;23(1):193–196. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0230193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zamboni L., Stefanini M. The fine structure of the neck of mammalian spermatozoa. Anat Rec. 1971 Feb;169(2):155–172. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091690203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zamboni L., Zemjanis R., Stefanini M. The fine structure of monkey and human spermatozoa. Anat Rec. 1971 Feb;169(2):129–153. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091690202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES