Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1972 May 1;53(2):532–560. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.2.532

PEROXISOMES IN ABSORPTIVE CELLS OF MAMMALIAN SMALL INTESTINE

Phyllis M Novikoff 1, Alex B Novikoff 1
PMCID: PMC2108721  PMID: 4112543

Abstract

Huge numbers of peroxisomes are present in guinea pig duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, and in rat duodenum. The peroxisomes have been studied by light and electron microscopy, including visualization by incubation in a newly-developed alkaline 3,3' diaminobenzidine (DAB) medium. Electron micrographs of more than 3700 guinea pig peroxisomes have been studied. The diameter of most peroxisomes ranges from 0.15 µ. to 0.25 µ. They often appear in clusters, surrounded by and continuous, in numerous places, with smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The ER is extremely tortuous in these regions. Serial sectioning is valuable for studying the ER-peroxisome relationships but viewing sections at different angles, tilted with a goniometer stage, is more informative. The intimate relations of the two organelles appear the same in tissue fixed in four different fixatives. The peroxisomes may be interpreted as localized dilatations of smooth ER retaining multiple membranous continuities. This interpretation is discussed in light of the turnover data on peroxisomal proteins of rat hepatocytes reported by Poole and colleagues. The very large numbers of peroxisomes in intestinal epithelium lead to speculations concerning their functional significance. They resemble the small peroxisomes described in many other cell types. Although the distinctive relationship of these peroxisomes to the ER is probably more significant than their small size, for practical purposes we propose the term "microperoxisomes" to distinguish these peroxisomes from the better-known larger peroxisomes of liver and kidney.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARCHER G. T., AIR G., JACKAS M., MORELL D. B. STUDIES ON RAT EOSINOPHIL PEROXIDASE. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Apr 26;99:96–101. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6593(65)80010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahlabo I., Barnard T. Observations on peroxisomes in brown adipose tissue of the rat. J Histochem Cytochem. 1971 Nov;19(11):670–675. doi: 10.1177/19.11.670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen J. M., Beard M. E. Alpha-hydroxy acid oxidase: localization in renal microbodies. Science. 1965 Sep 24;149(3691):1507–1509. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3691.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baggiolini M., Hirsch J. G., De Duve C. Further biochemical and morphological studies of granule fractions from rabbit heterophil leukocytes. J Cell Biol. 1970 Jun;45(3):586–597. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.3.586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cardell R. R., Jr, Badenhausen S., Porter K. R. Intestinal triglyceride absorption in the rat. An electron microscopical study. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jul;34(1):123–155. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Connock M., Pover W. Catalase particles in the epithelial cells of the guinea-pig small intestine. Histochem J. 1970 Sep;2(5):371–380. doi: 10.1007/BF01004718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DE DUVE C., PRESSMAN B. C., GIANETTO R., WATTIAUX R., APPELMANS F. Tissue fractionation studies. 6. Intracellular distribution patterns of enzymes in rat-liver tissue. Biochem J. 1955 Aug;60(4):604–617. doi: 10.1042/bj0600604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Duve C., Baudhuin P. Peroxisomes (microbodies and related particles). Physiol Rev. 1966 Apr;46(2):323–357. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1966.46.2.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Duve C. Evolution of the peroxisome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 Dec 19;168(2):369–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb43124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ericsson J. L., Trump B. F. Electron microscopic studies of the epithelium of the proximal tubule of the rat kidney. 3. Microbodies, multivesicular bodies, and the golgi apparatus. Lab Invest. 1966 Oct;15(10):1610–1633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Essner E. Endoplasmic reticulum and the origin of microbodies in fetal mouse liver. Lab Invest. 1967 Jul;17(1):71–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Essner E. Observations on hepatic and renal peroxisomes (microbodies) in the developing chick. J Histochem Cytochem. 1970 Feb;18(2):80–92. doi: 10.1177/18.2.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fahimi H. D. Cytochemical localization of peroxidatic activity of catalase in rat hepatic microbodies (peroxisomes). J Cell Biol. 1969 Nov;43(2):275–288. doi: 10.1083/jcb.43.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Farquhar M. G., Palade G. E. Cell junctions in amphibian skin. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jul;26(1):263–291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Frederick S. E., Newcomb E. H. Cytochemical localization of catalase in leaf microbodies (peroxisomes). J Cell Biol. 1969 Nov;43(2):343–353. doi: 10.1083/jcb.43.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GOLDACRE P. L., GALSTON A. W. The specific inhibition of catalase by substituted phenols. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1953 Mar;43(1):169–175. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(53)90096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Graham R. C., Jr, Karnovsky M. J. The early stages of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in the proximal tubules of mouse kidney: ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J Histochem Cytochem. 1966 Apr;14(4):291–302. doi: 10.1177/14.4.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Graham R. C., Jr, Karnovsky M. J. The histochemical demonstration of uricase activity. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965 Jul-Aug;13(6):448–453. doi: 10.1177/13.6.448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Graves L. B., Jr, Hanzely L., Trelease R. N. The occurrence and fine structural characterization of microbodies in Euglena gracilis. Protoplasma. 1971;72(2):141–152. doi: 10.1007/BF01279047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hirsch J. G., Fedorko M. E. Ultrastructure of human leukocytes after simultaneous fixation with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide and "postfixation" in uranyl acetate. J Cell Biol. 1968 Sep;38(3):615–627. doi: 10.1083/jcb.38.3.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hugon J. S. Absorption of horse-radish peroxidase by the mucosal cells of the duodenum of mouse. II. The newborn mouse. Histochemie. 1971;26(1):19–27. doi: 10.1007/BF00307779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hugon J. S., Maestracci D., Ménard D. Glucose 6-phosphatase activity in the intestinal epithelium of the mouse. J Histochem Cytochem. 1971 Sep;19(9):515–525. doi: 10.1177/19.9.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hugon J., Borgers M. Fine structural localization of acid and alkaline phosphatase activities in the absorbing cells of the duodenum of rodents. Histochemie. 1968;12(1):42–66. doi: 10.1007/BF00306346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kanaseki T., Kadota K. The "vesicle in a basket". A morphological study of the coated vesicle isolated from the nerve endings of the guinea pig brain, with special reference to the mechanism of membrane movements. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jul;42(1):202–220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.1.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuhn C. Particles resembling microbodies in normal and neoplastic perianal glands of dogs. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1968;90(4):554–562. doi: 10.1007/BF00339503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. LUCAS F. V., NEUFELD H. A., UTTERBACK J. G., MARTIN A. P., STOTZ E. The effect of estrogen on the production of a peroxidase in the rat uterus. J Biol Chem. 1955 Jun;214(2):775–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. LUFT J. H. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lazarow P. B., De Duve C. Intermediates in the biosynthesis of peroxisomal catalase in rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971 Dec 3;45(5):1198–1204. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(71)90145-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Legg P. G., Wood R. L. New observations on microbodies. A cytochemical study on CPIB-treated rat liver. J Cell Biol. 1970 Apr;45(1):118–129. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.1.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leighton F., Poole B., Beaufay H., Baudhuin P., Coffey J. W., Fowler S., De Duve C. The large-scale separation of peroxisomes, mitochondria, and lysosomes from the livers of rats injected with triton WR-1339. Improved isolation procedures, automated analysis, biochemical and morphological properties of fractions. J Cell Biol. 1968 May;37(2):482–513. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.2.482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lyle L. R., Jutila J. W. D-amino acid oxidase induction in the kidneys of germ-free mice. J Bacteriol. 1968 Sep;96(3):606–608. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.3.606-608.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. NEUFELD H. A., LEVAY A. N., LUCAS F. V., MARTIN A. P., STOTZ E. Peroxidase and cytochrome oxidase in rat tissues. J Biol Chem. 1958 Jul;233(1):209–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. NEUFELD H. A., LUCAS F. V., MARTIN A. P., STOTZ E. Peroxidase and cytochrome oxidase in the Walker carcinoma 256. Cancer Res. 1955 Sep;15(8):550–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. NOVIKOFF A. B., BEAUFAY H., DE DUVE C. Electron microscopy of lysosomerich fractions from rat liver. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):179–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. NOVIKOFF A. B., ESSNER E., QUINTANA N. GOLGI APPARATUS AND LYSOSOMES. Fed Proc. 1964 Sep-Oct;23:1010–1022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Novikoff A. B., Goldfischer S. Visualization of peroxisomes (microbodies) and mitochondria with diaminobenzidine. J Histochem Cytochem. 1969 Oct;17(10):675–680. doi: 10.1177/17.10.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Novikoff P. M., Novikoff A. B., Quintana N., Hauw J. J. Golgi apparatus, GERL, and lysosomes of neurons in rat dorsal root ganglia, studied by thick section and thin section cytochemistry. J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep;50(3):859–886. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Peters T. J. The subcellular localization of di- and tri-peptide hydrolase activity in guinea-pig small intestine. Biochem J. 1970 Nov;120(1):195–203. doi: 10.1042/bj1200195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Petrik P. Fine structural identification of peroxisomes in mouse and rat bronchiolar and alveolar epithelium. J Histochem Cytochem. 1971 Jun;19(6):339–348. doi: 10.1177/19.6.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Poole B. Biogenesis and turnover of rat liver peroxisomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 Dec 19;168(2):229–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb43112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Poole B., Higashi T., De Duve C. The synthesis and turnover of rat liver peroxisomes. 3. The size distribution of peroxisomes and the incorporation of new catalase. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):408–415. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Poole B., Leighton F., De Duve C. The synthesis and turnover of rat liver peroxisomes. II. Turnover of peroxisome proteins. J Cell Biol. 1969 May;41(2):536–546. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.2.536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reddy J., Svoboda D. Microbodies in experimentally altered cells. 8. Continuities between microbodies and their possible biologic significance. Lab Invest. 1971 Jan;24(1):74–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rhodes R. S., Karnovsky M. J. Loss of macromolecular barrier function associated with surgical trauma to the intestine. Lab Invest. 1971 Sep;25(3):220–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rigatuso J. L., Legg P. G., Wood R. L. Microbody formation in regenerating rat liver. J Histochem Cytochem. 1970 Dec;18(12):893–900. doi: 10.1177/18.12.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. SABATINI D. D., BENSCH K., BARRNETT R. J. Cytochemistry and electron microscopy. The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:19–58. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Scott P. J., Visentin L. P., Allen J. M. The enzymatic characteristics of peroxisomes of amphibian and avian liver and kidney. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 Dec 19;168(2):244–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb43113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shnitka T. K., Talibi G. G. Cytochemical localization by ferricyanide reduction of -hydroxy acid oxidase activity in peroxisomes of rat kidney. Histochemie. 1971;27(2):137–158. doi: 10.1007/BF00284956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Stelmaszyńska T., Zgliczyński J. M. Studies on hog intestine mucosa peroxidase. Eur J Biochem. 1971 Mar 1;19(1):56–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1971.tb01287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Strum J. M., Karnovsky M. J. Ultrastructural localization of peroxidase in submaxillary acinar cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1970 May;31(3):323–336. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(70)90135-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tsukada H., Mochizuki Y., Konishi T. Morphogenesis and development of microbodies of hepatocytes of rats during pre- and postnatal growth. J Cell Biol. 1968 May;37(2):231–243. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Venkatachalam M. A., Soltani M. H., Fahimi H. D. Fine structural localization of peroxidase activity in the epithelium of large intestine of rat. J Cell Biol. 1970 Jul;46(1):168–173. doi: 10.1083/jcb.46.1.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vigil E. L. Cytochemical and developmental changes in microbodies (glyoxysomes) and related organelles of castor bean endosperm. J Cell Biol. 1970 Sep;46(3):435–454. doi: 10.1083/jcb.46.3.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Williams N. E., Luft J. H. Use of a nitrogen mustard derivative in fixation for electron microscopy and observations on the ultrastructure of Tetrahymena. J Ultrastruct Res. 1968 Nov;25(3):271–292. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(68)80074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wood R. L., Legg P. G. Peroxidase activity in rat liver microbodies after amino-triazole inhibition. J Cell Biol. 1970 Jun;45(3):576–585. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.3.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yamamoto T. An electron microscope study of the columnar epithelial cell in the intestine of fresh water teleosts: goldfish (Carassius auratus) and rainbow trout (Salmo irideus). Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1966;72(1):66–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00336898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES