Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1972 Dec 1;55(3):681–695. doi: 10.1083/jcb.55.3.681

M BAND PROTEIN

Two Components Isolated from Chicken Breast Muscle

Barbra L Eaton 1, Frank A Pepe 1
PMCID: PMC2108813  PMID: 4632583

Abstract

M band protein can be specifically extracted from fresh chicken breast muscle myofibrils suspended in 5 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0. During discontinuous polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis the isolated protein separates into three bands which can be identified as two separate components (A, B) and a complex of the two. When partially purified fractions of the separated components are combined, an increase in the intensity of the band containing the complex can be shown. The polypeptide chain weights of the two components are 100,000 (A) and 40,000 (B) daltons as estimated by sodium dodecyl sulfate- (SDS-) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Antibody prepared against total M band protein stains only the M band of the myofibril and is completely absorbed by M band protein. M band protein also absorbs the M band staining specifically from antibody which stains both I and M bands. Immunodiffusion data indicate that anti-M band is a mixture of two specific antibodies, one against each component.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CORSI A., PERRY S. V. Some observations on the localization of myosin, actin and tropomyosin in the rabbit myofibril. Biochem J. 1958 Jan;68(1):12–17. doi: 10.1042/bj0680012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Corsi A., Muscatello U., Ronchetti I. Electron microscope observations of the location of actin and tropomyosin in the rabbit myofibril. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Aug;19(3):260–272. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80220-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DAVIS B. J. DISC ELECTROPHORESIS. II. METHOD AND APPLICATION TO HUMAN SERUM PROTEINS. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Dec 28;121:404–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DEUTSCH H. F. II. Separation of antibody-active proteins from various animal sera by ethanol fractionation techniques. Methods Med Res. 1952;5:284–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elliott G. F., Lowy J., Millman B. M. X-ray diffraction from living striated muscle during contraction. Nature. 1965 Jun 26;206(991):1357–1358. doi: 10.1038/2061357a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FRANK G. M., SAMOSUDOVA N. V., KRIUKOVA M. E., KALAMKAROVA M. V., OGIEVETSKAIA M. M. IZUCHENIE LOKALIZATSII MYSHECHNYKH BELKOV V IZOLIROVANNYKH MIOFIBRILLAKH METODOM FLUORESTSIRUIUSHCHIKH ANTITEL. Biofizika. 1963;8:569–574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kundrat E., Pepe F. A. The M band. Studies with fluorescent antibody staining. J Cell Biol. 1971 Feb;48(2):340–347. doi: 10.1083/jcb.48.2.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Masaki T., Takaiti O., Ebashi S. "M-substance", a new protein constituting the M-line of myofibrils. J Biochem. 1968 Dec;64(6):909–910. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a128975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Masaki T., Takaiti O. Purification of M-protein. J Biochem. 1972 Feb;71(2):355–357. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a129774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morimoto K., Harrington W. F. Isolation and physical chemical properties of an M-line protein from skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 1972 May 25;247(10):3052–3061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ORNSTEIN L. DISC ELECTROPHORESIS. I. BACKGROUND AND THEORY. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Dec 28;121:321–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb14207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PERRY S. V., CORSI A. Extraction of proteins other than myosin from the isolated rabbit myofibril. Biochem J. 1958 Jan;68(1):5–12. doi: 10.1042/bj0680005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pepe F. A. Some aspects of the structural organization of the myofibril as revealed by antibody--staining methods. J Cell Biol. 1966 Mar;28(3):505–525. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.3.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reynolds J. A., Tanford C. The gross conformation of protein-sodium dodecyl sulfate complexes. J Biol Chem. 1970 Oct 10;245(19):5161–5165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stromer M. H., Hartshorne D. J., Mueller H., Rice R. V. The effect of various protein fractions on Z- and M-line reconstitution. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jan;40(1):167–178. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.1.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. TUNIK B., HOLTZER H. The distribution of muscle antigens in contracted myofibrils determined by fluorescein-labeled antibodies. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Oct;11:67–75. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weber K., Osborn M. The reliability of molecular weight determinations by dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Biol Chem. 1969 Aug 25;244(16):4406–4412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES