Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1972 Dec 1;55(3):606–615. doi: 10.1083/jcb.55.3.606

DO MORPHOGENETIC TISSUE REARRANGEMENTS REQUIRE ACTIVE CELL MOVEMENTS?

The Reversible Inhibition of Cell Sorting and Tissue Spreading by Cytochalasin B

Malcolm S Steinberg 1, Lawrence L Wiseman 1
PMCID: PMC2108821  PMID: 4676369

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that cell sorting and tissue spreading are caused by cell combination-specific differences in intercellular adhesive energies, acting in a system of motile cells. We wished to determine whether these adhesive energies could drive cell rearrangements as well as guide them. Accordingly, aggregates of intermixed embryonic cells were cultured in solutions of the drug cytochalasin B (CCB) at a concentration shown to inhibit the locomotion of cells on a solid surface. In addition, spherical aggregates of several kinds were cultured in mutual contact under similar conditions. Both cell sorting and tissue spreading were found to be inhibited. The prompt release of this inhibition upon removal of the CCB showed that the inhibited cells were not merely injured. Moreover, aggregation experiments showed that CCB did not prevent cells of several kinds from initiating mutual adhesions. In fact, heart cell aggregation was enhanced by CCB. We conclude that interfacial forces, originating outside the cell, act together with forces originating inside it in bringing about the morphogenetic movements of cell sorting and tissue spreading. We propose the term "cooperative cell locomotion" to describe translational movements of cells arising from such a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic forces.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (830.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M. Contact inhibition: the phenomenon and its biological implications. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1967 Sep;26:249–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allison A. C., Davies P., De Petris S. Role of contractile microfilaments in macrophage movement and endocytosis. Nat New Biol. 1971 Aug 4;232(31):153–155. doi: 10.1038/newbio232153a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong P. B., Parenti D. Cell sorting in the presence of cytochalasin B. J Cell Biol. 1972 Dec;55(3):542–553. doi: 10.1083/jcb.55.3.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carter S. B. Effects of cytochalasins on mammalian cells. Nature. 1967 Jan 21;213(5073):261–264. doi: 10.1038/213261a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter S. B. Haptotaxis and the mechanism of cell motility. Nature. 1967 Jan 21;213(5073):256–260. doi: 10.1038/213256a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GUSTAFSON T. CELLULAR MECHANISMS IN THE MORPHOGENESIS OF THE SEA URCHIN EMBRYO. CELL CONTACTS WITHIN THE ECTODERM AND BETWEEN MESENCHYME AND ECTODERM CELLS. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Dec;32:570–589. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90195-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GUSTAFSON T., WOLPERT L. Studies on the cellular basis of morphogenesis in the sea urchin embryo. Directed movements of primary mesenchvme cells in normal and vegetalized larvae. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Jun;24:64–79. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gail M. H., Boone C. W. Cytochalasin effects on BALB-3T3 fibroblasts: dose-dependent, reversible alteration of motility and cytoplasmic cleavage. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Sep;68(1):226–228. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90610-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moscona A. THE DEVELOPMENT IN VITRO OF CHIMERIC AGGREGATES OF DISSOCIATED EMBRYONIC CHICK AND MOUSE CELLS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1957 Jan 15;43(1):184–194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.43.1.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Phillips H. M., Steinberg M. S. Equilibrium measurements of embryonic chick cell adhesiveness. I. Shape equilibrium in centrifugal fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Sep;64(1):121–127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. STEINBERG M. S. Mechanism of tissue reconstruction by dissociated cells. II. Time-course of events. Science. 1962 Sep 7;137(3532):762–763. doi: 10.1126/science.137.3532.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STEINBERG M. S. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. Science. 1963 Aug 2;141(3579):401–408. doi: 10.1126/science.141.3579.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanger J. W., Holtzer H. Cytochalasin B: effects on cell morphology, cell adhesion, and mucopolysaccharide synthesis (cultured cells-contractile microfilaments-glycoproteins-embryonic cells-sorting-out). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):253–257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Spooner B. S., Yamada K. M., Wessells N. K. Microfilaments and cell locomotion. J Cell Biol. 1971 Jun;49(3):595–613. doi: 10.1083/jcb.49.3.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Steinberg M. S. Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. J Exp Zool. 1970 Apr;173(4):395–433. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401730406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steinberg M. S. ON THE MECHANISM OF TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION BY DISSOCIATED CELLS, III. FREE ENERGY RELATIONS AND THE REORGANIZATION OF FUSED, HETERONOMIC TISSUE FRAGMENTS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Oct;48(10):1769–1776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.10.1769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. TRINKAUS J. P., GROSS M. C. The use of tritiated thymidine for marking migratory cells. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Jun;24:52–57. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90246-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wessells N. K., Spooner B. S., Ash J. F., Bradley M. O., Luduena M. A., Taylor E. L., Wrenn J. T., Yamada K. Microfilaments in cellular and developmental processes. Science. 1971 Jan 15;171(3967):135–143. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3967.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wiseman L. L., Steinberg M. S., Phillips H. M. Experimental modulation of intercellular cohesiveness: reversal of tissue assembly patterns. Dev Biol. 1972 Jul;28(3):498–517. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES