Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1973 Sep 1;58(3):662–675. doi: 10.1083/jcb.58.3.662

CHEMICAL DISSECTION OF MAMMALIAN SPERMATOZOA

C F Millette 1, P G Spear 1, W E Gall 1, G M Edelman 1
PMCID: PMC2109069  PMID: 4747921

Abstract

Spermatozoa from several mammalian species have been dissected by chemical methods to yield free heads, tails with attached midpieces, and tails from which the mitochondrial components of the midpiece were removed. Mouse and rat spermatozoa were cleaved by brief treatment with trypsin to yield free heads and tails, while human, guinea pig, and rabbit spermatozoa were cleaved by trypsin only after incubation with 2-mercaptoethanol or dithiothreitol. Spermatozoa were also cleaved at the junction of the head and the tail by treatment with acid and base. Mitochondria were removed from intact spermatozoa or isolated tails by mechanical shear after treatment with 2-mercaptoethanol or dithiothreitol. The dissected components of spermatozoa were fractionated with good yield and high purity by density gradient centrifugation. Ultrastructural analysis indicates that proteolytic cleavage to yield separated heads and tails occurs at a specific location in the neck of the spermatozoon, leaving the basal plate attached to the head of the cell. In contrast, after acid cleavage the basal plate remains with the midpiece. Proteolytic treatment has no apparent effect on any other spermatozoan structures, whereas acid or base treatment results in damage to the plasma membrane, the acrosome, and other structures. The specificity of the proteolytic cleavage suggests that a particular protein or group of proteins may be responsible for the linkage between the sperm head and tail.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AUSTIN C. R. ACROSOME LOSS FROM THE RABBIT SPERMATOZOON IN RELATION TO ENTRY INTO THE EGG. J Reprod Fertil. 1963 Oct;6:313–314. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0060313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allison A. C., Hartree E. F. Lysosomal enzymes in the acrosome and their possible role in fertilization. J Reprod Fertil. 1970 Apr;21(3):501–515. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0210501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson W. A. Cytochemistry of sea urchin gametes. II. Ruthenium red staining of gamete membranes of sea urchins. J Ultrastruct Res. 1968 Aug;24(3):322–333. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(68)90068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blom E., Birch-Andersen A. Ultrastructure of the "decapitated sperm defect" in Guernsey bulls. J Reprod Fertil. 1970 Oct;23(1):67–72. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0230067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FAWCETT D. W., ITO S. THE FINE STRUCTURE OF BAT SPERMATOZOA. Am J Anat. 1965 May;116:567–609. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001160306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fawcett D. W., Phillips D. M. The fine structure and development of the neck region of the mammalian spermatozoon. Anat Rec. 1969 Oct;165(2):153–164. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091650204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldberg E. H., Aoki T., Boyse E. A., Bennett D. Detection of H-2 antigens on mouse spermatozoa by the cytotoxicity test. Nature. 1970 Nov 7;228(5271):570–572. doi: 10.1038/228570a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HARTREE E. F., SRIVASTAVA P. N. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE ACROSOMES OF RAM SPERMATOZOA. J Reprod Fertil. 1965 Feb;9:47–60. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0090047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lung B. Ultrastructure and chromatin disaggregation of human sperm head with thioglycolate treatment. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jan;52(1):179–186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. NEUBERT D., LEHNINGER A. L. The effect of thiols and disulfides on water uptake and extrusion by rat liver mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1962 Mar;237:952–958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. NICANDER L., BANE A. Fine structure of boar spermatozoa. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1962;57:390–405. doi: 10.1007/BF00343326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pihlaja D. J., Roth L. E., Consigli R. A. Bovine sperm fractionation. I. Selective degradation and segment separation. Biol Reprod. 1973 Apr;8(3):311–320. doi: 10.1093/biolreprod/8.3.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stambaugh R., Buckley J. Identification and subcellular localization of the enzymes effecting penetration of the zona pellucida by rabbit spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1969 Aug;19(3):423–432. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0190423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Terzakis J. A. Uranyl acetate, a stain and a fixative. J Ultrastruct Res. 1968 Jan;22(1):168–184. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(68)90055-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zamboni L., Stefanini M. The fine structure of the neck of mammalian spermatozoa. Anat Rec. 1971 Feb;169(2):155–172. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091690203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zamboni L., Zemjanis R., Stefanini M. The fine structure of monkey and human spermatozoa. Anat Rec. 1971 Feb;169(2):129–153. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091690202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES