Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1973 Nov 1;59(2):367–377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.59.2.367

PHOTOTAXIS IN CHLAMYDOMONAS REINHARDTII

Robert L Stavis 1, Rona Hirschberg 1
PMCID: PMC2109087  PMID: 4805005

Abstract

Parameters which distinguish phototaxis from random motility in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii have been defined with quantitative assays. The phototactic responses in photosynthetic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic cultures were highest during exponential growth and declined rapidly as the cultures entered stationary phase. In contrast, random motility was relatively constant throughout growth. Phototaxis and motility also differ in their sensitivity to azide and antimycin A. Both of these drugs inhibited phototaxis within 5 min, but motility was unaffected for at least 30 min. Phototaxis and motility have different ion requirements. Optimum motility was observed in the presence of either Ca++ or Mg++; phototaxis required Ca++ and either K+ or NH4 +. Photosynthesis is not required for phototaxis, since phototaxis was not inhibited by dichlorophenyldimethyl urea, and a mutant lacking chlorophyll was phototactic.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (684.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler J. Chemoreceptors in bacteria. Science. 1969 Dec 26;166(3913):1588–1597. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3913.1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler J., Dahl M. M. A method for measuring the motility of bacteria and for comparing random and non-random motility. J Gen Microbiol. 1967 Feb;46(2):161–173. doi: 10.1099/00221287-46-2-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum J. J. Existence of a breaking point in cilia and flagella. J Theor Biol. 1971 Nov;33(2):257–263. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CLAYTON R. K. On the interplay of environmental factors affecting taxis and motility in Rhodospirillum rubrum. Arch Mikrobiol. 1958;29(2):189–212. doi: 10.1007/BF00409860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CLAYTON R. K. Tactic responses and metabolic activities in Rhodospirillum rubrum. Arch Mikrobiol. 1955;22(2):204–213. doi: 10.1007/BF00409306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chance B., Sager R. Oxygen and Light Induced Oxidations of Cytochrome, Flavoprotein, and Pyridine Nucleotide in a Chlamydomonas Mutant. Plant Physiol. 1957 Nov;32(6):548–561. doi: 10.1104/pp.32.6.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diehn B., Tollin G. Phototaxis in Euglena. IV. Effect of inhibitors of oxidative and photophosphorylation on the rate of phototaxis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1967 Jul;121(1):169–177. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(67)90021-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodenough U. W., Armstrong J. J., Levine R. P. Photosynthetic Properties of ac-31, a Mutant Strain of Chlamydomonas reinhardi Devoid of Chloroplast Membrane Stacking. Plant Physiol. 1969 Jul;44(7):1001–1012. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.7.1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gross R. E., Dugger W. M. Photoinhibition of growth of a yellow and colorless form of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Photochem Photobiol. 1969 Oct;10(4):243–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1969.tb05687.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hazelbauer G. L., Adler J. Role of the galactose binding protein in chemotaxis of Escherichia coli toward galactose. Nat New Biol. 1971 Mar 24;230(12):101–104. doi: 10.1038/newbio230101a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Neumann J., Levine R. P. Reversible pH Changes in Cells of Chlamydomonas reinhardi Resulting from CO(2) Fixation in the Light and Its Evolution in the Dark. Plant Physiol. 1971 May;47(5):700–704. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.5.700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nultsch W. Einfluss von Redox-Systemen auf die Bewegungsaktivität und das phototaktische Reaktionsverhalten von Phormidium uncinatum. Arch Mikrobiol. 1968;63(4):295–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SAGER R., GRANICK S. Nutritional studies with Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1953 Oct 14;56(5):831–838. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1953.tb30261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlanger G., Sager R., Ramanis Z. Mutation of a cytoplasmic gene in Chlamydomonas alters chlorplast ribosome function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Dec;69(12):3551–3555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.12.3551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weaver P. Temperature-sensitive mutations of the photosynthetic apparatus of Rhodospirillum rubrum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jan;68(1):136–138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.1.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson D. F. Azide inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport. II. Spectral changes induced by azide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967 May 9;131(3):431–440. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(67)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES