Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1974 Feb 1;60(2):405–415. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.2.405

THE NUCLEAR PERMEABILITY, INTRACELLULAR DISTRIBUTION, AND DIFFUSION OF INULIN IN THE AMPHIBIAN OOCYTE

Samuel B Horowitz 1, Leonard C Moore 1
PMCID: PMC2109164  PMID: 4544299

Abstract

[3H]Inulin (mol wt ≈ 5,500) solutions are microinjected into the cytoplasm of mature oocytes of Rana pipiens and the subsequent movement of the solute recorded by quantitative ultralow temperature autoradiography. The autoradiographs show transient cellular diffusion gradients, the influence of the nucleus on these gradients, and the nuclear:cytoplasmic distribution of inulin. Analysis leads to the following conclusions: (a) Inulin diffuses in cytoplasm at about 3 x 10-6 cm2/s, or one-fifth as rapidly as in water. Most of this decrease is attributable to the increased tortuosity of the diffusional path due to the presence of inclusions and macromolecules. (b) The nuclear envelope is very permeable to inulin; its resistance to inulin's passage is similar to that of cytoplasm. The envelope appears to play a negligible role in regulating the nucleocytoplasmic movement of solutes smaller than macromolecules, (c) Inulin concentrates in the nucleus to four times its cytoplasmic level; this is attributed to solute exclusion from cytoplasmic water. Evidence is presented that among hydrophilic solutes the degree of exclusion increases with molecular size. The potential significance of cytoplasmic exclusion processes to understanding secretion and the intracellular movement of macromolecules is briefly discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (658.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABELSON P. H., DURYEE W. R. Radioactive sodium permeability and exchange in frog eggs. Biol Bull. 1949 Jun;96(3):205–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ACKERS G. K. MOLECULAR EXCLUSION AND RESTRICTED DIFFUSION PROCESSES IN MOLECULAR-SIEVE CHROMATOGRAPHY. Biochemistry. 1964 May;3:723–730. doi: 10.1021/bi00893a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Century T. J., Fenichel I. R., Horowitz S. B. The concentrations of water, sodium and potassium in the nucleus and cytoplasm of amphibian oocytes. J Cell Sci. 1970 Jul;7(1):5–13. doi: 10.1242/jcs.7.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FUKUI S., HOCHSTER R. M. CARBOHYDRATE INHIBITORS OF SUCROSE UPTAKE BY RESTING CELLS OF AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS. Can J Biochem. 1964 Jul;42:1023–1031. doi: 10.1139/o64-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldstein L., Prescott D. M. Proteins in nucleocytoplasmic interactions. I. The fundamental characteristics of the rapidly migrating proteins and the slow turnover proteins of the Amoeba proteus nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jun;33(3):637–644. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gurdon J. B. Nuclear transplantation and the control of gene activity in animal development. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1970 Dec 1;176(1044):303–314. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1970.0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horowitz S. B., Fenichel I. R. Analysis of glycerol-3H transport in the frog oocyte by extractive and radioautographic techniques. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Jun;51(6):703–730. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.6.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horowitz S. B., Fenichel I. R. Analysis of sodium transport in the amphibian oocyte by extractive and radioautographic techniques. J Cell Biol. 1970 Oct;47(1):120–131. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Horowitz S. B. The permeability of the amphibian oocyte nucleus, in situ. J Cell Biol. 1972 Sep;54(3):609–625. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jelinek W., Goldstein L. Isolation and characterization of some of the proteins that shuttle between cytoplasm and nucleus in Amoeba proteus. J Cell Physiol. 1973 Apr;81(2):181–197. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040810207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lanman R. C., Burton J. A., Schanker L. S. Diffusion coefficients of some 14 C-labeled saccharides of biological interest. Life Sci II. 1971 Jul 22;10(14):803–811. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(71)90004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ling G. N., Ochsenfeld M. M., Karreman G. Is the cell membrane a universal rate-limiting barrier to the movement of water between the living cell and its surrounding medium? J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6):1807–1820. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.6.1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lovtrup S., Mild K. H., Berglund A. The influence of diffusion in the external medium upon the determination of cytoplasmic diffusion coefficients. J Cell Physiol. 1970 Oct;76(2):167–173. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040760206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mild K. H., James T. L., Gillen K. T. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation time and self-diffusion coefficient measurements of water in frog ovarian eggs (Rana pipiens). J Cell Physiol. 1972 Aug;80(1):155–158. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040800117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PHELPS C. F. THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF INULIN SOLUTIONS. Biochem J. 1965 Apr;95:41–47. doi: 10.1042/bj0950041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paine P. L., Feldherr C. M. Nucleocytoplasmic exchange of macromolecules. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Sep;74(1):81–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90483-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prescott D., Goldstein L. Proteins in nucleocytoplasmic interactions. 3. Redistributions of nuclear proteins during and following mitosis in Amoeba proteus. J Cell Biol. 1968 Nov;39(2):404–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.2.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Puca G. A., Nola E., Sica V., Bresciani F. Estrogen-binding proteins of calf uterus. Interrelationship between various forms and identification of a receptor-transforming factor. Biochemistry. 1972 Oct 24;11(22):4157–4165. doi: 10.1021/bi00772a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SCHANTZ E. J., LAUFFER M. A. Diffusion measurements in agar gel. Biochemistry. 1962 Jul;1:658–663. doi: 10.1021/bi00910a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. STEIN W. D. Spontaneous and enzyme-induced dimer formation and its role in membrane permeability. II. The mechanism of movement of glycerol across the human erythrocyte membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962 May 7;59:47–65. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(62)90697-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stumpf W. E. Subcellular distribution of 3-H-estradiol in rat uterus by quantitative autoradiography--a comparison between 3-H-estradiol and 3-H-norethynodrel. Endocrinology. 1968 Oct;83(4):777–782. doi: 10.1210/endo-83-4-777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas P. J. Steroid hormones and their receptors. J Endocrinol. 1973 May;57(2):333–359. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0570333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Welch K., Sadler K. Permeability of the choroid plexus of the rabbit to several solutes. Am J Physiol. 1966 Mar;210(3):652–660. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.3.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES