Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1974 Jul 1;62(1):104–113. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.1.104

PROPHASING OF INTERPHASE NUCLEI AND INDUCTION OF NUCLEAR ENVELOPES AROUND METAPHASE CHROMOSOMES IN HELA AND CHINESE HAMSTER HOMO- AND HETEROKARYONS

Yoshitaka Obara 1, Lee S Chai 1, Herbert Weinfeld 1, Avery A Sandberg 1
PMCID: PMC2109174  PMID: 4135003

Abstract

Fusing human HeLa metaphase cells with HeLa interphase cells resulted within 30 min in either of two phenomena in the resultant binucleate cell: either prophasing of the interphase nucleus or formation of a normal-appearing nuclear envelope around the metaphase chromosomes. The frequency of either occurrence was strongly dependent on environmental pH. At pH's of 6.6–8.0, prophasing predominated; at pH 8.5 nuclear envelope formation predominated. Additionally, the frequencies of the two events in multinucleate cells depended on the metaphase/interphase ratio. When the ratio was 0.33 nuclear envelope formation predominated; when it was 2.0 prophasing predominated. In their general features, the results with fused HeLa cells resembled those reported earlier with fused Chinese hamster Don cells. However, the results provided an indication that between pH 6.6 and 8.0 the HeLa metaphase cells possessed a much greater capacity than the Don metaphase cells to induce prophasing. Fusion of Don metaphase cells with HeLa interphase cells or of Don interphase cells with HeLa metaphase cells at pH 8.0 resulted in nuclear envelope formation or prophasing in each kind of heterokaryon. As in the homokaryons, the frequencies of the two events in the heterokaryons depended on the metaphase/interphase ratio. The statistics of prophasing and nuclear envelope formation in the homo- and heterokaryon populations were consistent with the notion that disruption or formation of the nuclear envelope depends on the balance attained between disruptive and formative processes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (816.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aula P. Electron-microscopic observations on Sendai virus-induced chromosome pulverization in HeLa cells. Hereditas. 1970;65(2):163–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1970.tb02314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aya T., Sandberg A. A. Chromosome pulverization and RNA synthesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1971 Nov;47(5):961–969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ikeuchi T., Sanbe M., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Induction of nuclear envelopes around metaphase chromosomes after fusion with interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1971 Oct;51(1):104–115. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.1.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson R. T., Rao P. N., Hughes H. D. Mammalian cell fusion. 3. A HeLa cell inducer of premature chromosome condensation active in cells from a variety of animal species. J Cell Physiol. 1970 Oct;76(2):151–157. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040760204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson R. T., Rao P. N. Mammalian cell fusion: induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase nuclei. Nature. 1970 May 23;226(5247):717–722. doi: 10.1038/226717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kato H., Sandberg A. A. Chromosome pulverization in chinese hamster cells induced by Sendai virus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968 Nov;41(5):1117–1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MOLLENHAUER H. H. PLASTIC EMBEDDING MIXTURES FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. Stain Technol. 1964 Mar;39:111–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Matsui S. I., Yoshida H., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Induction of prophase in interphase nuclei by fusion with metaphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jul;54(1):120–132. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.1.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matsui S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Dependence of chromosome pulverization in virus-fused cells on events in the G2 period. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1971 Aug;47(2):401–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Matsui S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Fate of chromatin of interphase nuclei subjected to "phosphasing" in virus-fused cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972 Dec;49(6):1621–1630. doi: 10.1093/jnci/49.6.1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore G. E., Ito E., Ulrich K., Sandberg A. A. Culture of human leukemia cells. Cancer. 1966 May;19(5):713–723. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196605)19:5<713::aid-cncr2820190518>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Obara Y., Yoshida H., Chai L. S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Contrast between the environmental pH dependencies of prophasing and nuclear membrane formation in interphase-metaphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1973 Sep;58(3):608–617. doi: 10.1083/jcb.58.3.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanbe M., Aya T., Ikeuchi T., Sandberg A. A. Electron microscopic study of fused cells, with special reference to chromosome pulvrization. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 May;44(5):1079–1089. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stenman S. Depression of RNA synthesis in the prematurely condensed chromatin of pulverized HeLa cells. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Dec;69(2):372–376. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90237-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stubblefield E., Klevecz R. Synchronization of Chinese hamster cells by reversal of colcemid inhibition. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Dec;40(3):660–664. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90244-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES