Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1974 Mar 1;60(3):702–720. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.3.702

AN UNUSUAL MITOTIC MECHANISM IN THE PARASITIC PROTOZOAN SYNDINIUM SP

Hans Ris 1, Donna F Kubai 1
PMCID: PMC2109247  PMID: 4132862

Abstract

Syndinium and related organisms which parasitize a number of invertebrates have been classified with dinoflagellates on the basis of the morphology of their zoospores. We demonstrate here that with respect to chromosome structure and chemistry as well as nuclear division, they differ fundamentally from free-living dinoflagellates. Alkaline fast green staining indicates the presence of basic proteins in Syndinium chromosomes. Chromatin fibers are about 30 Å thick and do not show the arrangement characteristic of dinoflagellate chromosomes. The four V-shaped chromosomes are permanently attached at their apexes to a specific area of the nuclear membrane through a kinetochore-like trilaminar disk inserted into an opening of the membrane. Microtubules connect the outer dense layer of each kinetochore to the bases of the two centrioles located in a pocket-shaped invagination of the nuclear envelope. During division kinetochores duplicate, and each sister kinetochore becomes attached to a different centriole. As the centrioles move apart, apparently pushed by a bundle of elongating microtubules (central spindle), the daughter chromosomes are passively pulled apart. During the process of elongation of the central spindle, the cytoplasmic groove on the nuclear surface which contains the central spindle sinks into the nuclear space and is transformed into a cylindrical cytoplasmic channel. A constriction in the persisting nuclear envelope leads to the formation of two daughter nuclei.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alfert M., Geschwind I. I. A Selective Staining Method for the Basic Proteins of Cell Nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Oct;39(10):991–999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.10.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DODGE J. D. CYTOCHEMICAL STAINING OF SECTIONS FROM PLASTIC-EMBEDDED FLAGELLATES. Stain Technol. 1964 Nov;39:381–386. doi: 10.3109/10520296409063310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FRASCA J. M., PARKS V. R. A ROUTINE TECHNIQUE FOR DOUBLE-STAINING ULTRATHIN SECTIONS USING URANYL AND LEAD SALTS. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:157–161. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grell K. G., Schwalbach G. Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Chromosomen der Dinoflagellaten. Chromosoma. 1965;17(3):230–245. doi: 10.1007/BF00283600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jokelainen P. T. The ultrastructure and spatial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Jul;19(1):19–44. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kubai D. F., Ris H. Division in the dinoflagellate Gyrodinium cohnii (Schiller). A new type of nuclear reproduction. J Cell Biol. 1969 Feb;40(2):508–528. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.2.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kubai D. F. Unorthodox mitosis in Trichonympha agilis: kinetochore differentiation and chromosome movement. J Cell Sci. 1973 Sep;13(2):511–552. doi: 10.1242/jcs.13.2.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leadbeater B., Dodge J. D. An electron microscope study of nuclear and cell division in a dinoflagellate. Arch Mikrobiol. 1967 Jun 21;57(3):239–254. doi: 10.1007/BF00405950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MOLLENHAUER H. H. PLASTIC EMBEDDING MIXTURES FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. Stain Technol. 1964 Mar;39:111–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Manton I., Kowallik K., von Stosch H. A. Observations on the fine structure and development of the spindle at mitosis and meiosis in a marine centric diatom (Lithodesmium undulatum). IV. The second meiotic division and conclusion. J Cell Sci. 1970 Sep;7(2):407–443. doi: 10.1242/jcs.7.2.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RYTER A., KELLENBERGER E., BIRCHANDERSEN A., MAALOE O. Etude au microscope électronique de plasmas contenant de l'acide désoxyribonucliéique. I. Les nucléoides des bactéries en croissance active. Z Naturforsch B. 1958 Sep;13B(9):597–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roos U. P. Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. II. Kinetochore structure and function. Chromosoma. 1973;41(2):195–220. doi: 10.1007/BF00319696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ryter A. Association of the nucleus and the membrane of bacteria: a morphological study. Bacteriol Rev. 1968 Mar;32(1):39–54. doi: 10.1128/br.32.1.39-54.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Soyer M. O. Les ultrastructures nucléaires de la Noctiluque (Dinoflagelleé libre) au cours de la sporogenèse. Chromosoma. 1972;39(4):419–441. doi: 10.1007/BF00326176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Soyer M. O. Structure du noyau des Blastodinium (Dinoflagellés parasites). Division et condensation chromatique. Chromosoma. 1971;33(1):70–114. doi: 10.1007/BF00326385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES