Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1974 Mar 1;60(3):695–701. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.3.695

THE LABELING OF CULTURED CELLS OF ACER WITH [14C]PROLINE AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE

F C Steward 1, H W Israel 1, M M Salpeter 1
PMCID: PMC2109250  PMID: 4824292

Abstract

The distribution of the radioactivity from [14C]proline that is bound in cultured cells of Acer has been determined by electron microscope autoradiography. In this way proline may be related to the cell wall as a morphological entity rather than as a fraction in a biochemical separation of a heterogeneous crop of cells. The cells in culture may vary greatly. Some are active growing, turgid cells, with thin protoplasts tightly pressed against their walls; in others the protoplasts may spontaneously withdraw from the wall; in still others the protoplasts disorganize, and walls thicken and become sculptured as the cells differentiate and even senesce. Different culturing practices may affect the status of the cells, and this, in turn, affects the distribution of radioactivity from proline in the cells. Cells which are actively growing, turgid, and nucleated have the highest grain density in their protoplasts and nuclei; as the protoplasts of such cells withdraw from their walls, they retain the bulk of the radioactivity. On the other hand, in cells which have thickened walls and sparse protoplast contents, the radioactivity is accumulated in their walls. A high content of proline and hydroxyproline-rich protein is, therefore, not a necessary or invariable feature of the cell walls of cultured Acer cells but depends on the state of development of these cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (615.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Israel H. W., Salpeter M. M., Steward F. C. The incorporation of radioactive proline into cultured cells. Interpretations based on radioautography and electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1968 Dec;39(3):698–715. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.3.698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LAMPORT D. T. Oxygen fixation into hydroxyproline of plant cell wall protein. J Biol Chem. 1963 Apr;238:1438–1440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lamport D. T. The isolation and partial characterization of hydroxyproline-rich glycopeptides obtained by enzymic degradation of primary cell walls. Biochemistry. 1969 Mar;8(3):1155–1163. doi: 10.1021/bi00831a049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Roberts K., Northcote D. H. The structure of sycamore callus cells during division in a partially synchronized suspension culture. J Cell Sci. 1970 Mar;6(2):299–321. doi: 10.1242/jcs.6.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. STEWARD F. C., CAPLIN S. M. A tissue culture from potato tuber; the synergistic action of 2,4-D and of coconut milk. Science. 1951 May 4;113(2940):518–520. doi: 10.1126/science.113.2940.518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Salpeter M. M., Salpeter E. E. Resolution in electron microscope radioautography. II. Carbon 14. J Cell Biol. 1971 Aug;50(2):324–332. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.2.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Steward F. C., Mott R. L., Israel H. W., Ludford P. M. Prolone in the vesicles and sporelings of Valonia ventricosa and the concept of cell wall protein. Nature. 1970 Feb 21;225(5234):760–763. doi: 10.1038/225760a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Street H. E., Henshaw G. G. Cell division and differentiation in suspension cultures of higher plant cells. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1963;17:234–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES