Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1974 Oct 1;63(1):227–233. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.1.227

IMAGE ANALYSIS OF CHROMATIN IN CELLS OF PREIMPLANTATION MOUSE EMBRYOS

Wojciech Sawicki 1, Jan Rowínski 1, Jan Abramczuk 1
PMCID: PMC2109330  PMID: 4607859

Abstract

Mouse two-celled embryos and blastulae were Feulgen stained and the DNA content of their nuclei was measured with an integrating microdensitometer. The cells considered on the basis of their nuclear DNA content to be in G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycle were selected and their total chromatin area and chromatin areas at different gray levels were measured by the image analyzing computer, Quantimet. The measurements were aimed at quantitation of several features of the chromatin morphology of cells in different functional states. The total area of chromatin was found to increase, and the mean density of chromatin to decrease, from the G1 to the G2 phase of the cell cycle in both two-celled embryos and blastulae. The area of chromatin decreased, and the mean density of chromatin increased, as embryos developed from two-celled to blastula stage. It was concluded that nuclear morphology in preimplantation mouse embryos depends on both the phase of the cell cycle and the stage of development. The method of image analysis described was found to be useful for quantitation of changes in chromatin morphology.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (423.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALFERT M. A cytochemical study of oogenesis and cleavage in the mouse. J Cell Physiol. 1950 Dec;36(3):381–409. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030360306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartels P. H., Bibbo M., Bahr G. F., Taylor J., Wied G. L. Cervical cytology: descriptive statistics for nuclei of normal and atypical cell types. Acta Cytol. 1973 Sep-Oct;17(5):449–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartels P. H., Wied G. L., Bahr G. F. Cell recognition from equiprobable extinction range contours. Acta Cytol. 1968 May-Jun;12(3):205–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calarco P. G., Brown E. H. An ultrastructural and cytological study of preimplantation development of the mouse. J Exp Zool. 1969 Jul;171(3):253–283. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401710303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FOWLER R. E., EDWARDS R. G. Induction of superovulation and pregnancy in mature mice by gonadotrophins. J Endocrinol. 1957 Sep;15(4):374–384. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0150374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gamow E. I., Prescott D. M. The cell life cycle during early embryogenesis of the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jan;59(1):117–123. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90630-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HAY E. D., REVEL J. P. The fine structure of the DNP component of the nucleus. An electron microscopic study utilizing autoradiography to localize DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol. 1963 Jan;16:29–51. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hillman N., Tasca R. J. Ultrastructural and autoradiographic studies of mouse cleavage stages. Am J Anat. 1969 Oct;126(2):151–173. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001260203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Inui N., Takayama S. Re-evaluation of the quantity of DNA in cell nucleus of two animal species by microspectrophotometry and autoradiography. Cytologia (Tokyo) 1970 Jun;35(2):280–293. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.35.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klawe H., Rowiński J. Malignancy associated changes (MAC) in cells of buccal smears detected by means of objective image analysis. Acta Cytol. 1974 Jan-Feb;18(1):30–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Luthardt F. W., Donahue R. P. Pronuclear DNA synthesis in mouse eggs. An autoradiographic study. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Nov;82(1):143–151. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90256-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MINTZ B. SYNTHETIC PROCESSES AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT IN THE MAMMALIAN EGG. J Exp Zool. 1964 Oct;157:85–100. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401570114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mawdesley-Thomas L. E., Healey P. Automated analysis of cellular change in histological sections. Science. 1969 Mar 14;163(3872):1200–1200. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3872.1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prensky W. Automated image analysis in autoradiography. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Oct;68(2):388–394. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90164-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Samoshkina N. A. Issledovanie sinteza DNK v period drobleniia iaitsekletok myshi (opyty in vitro) Tsitologiia. 1968 Jul;10(7):856–864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sawicki W., Lipetz J. Albumen embedding and individual mounting of one or many mammalian ova on slides for fluid processing. Stain Technol. 1971 Sep;46(5):261–263. doi: 10.3109/10520297109067869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tokuyasu K., Madden S. C., Zeldis L. J. Fine structural alterations of interphase nuclei of lymphocytes stimulated to grwoth activity in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1968 Dec;39(3):630–660. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.3.630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Viola-Magni M. P. Changes in the DNA content of adrenal medulla nuclei of rats intermittently exposed to cold. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3):415–433. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES