Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1974 Oct 1;63(1):71–83. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.1.71

SUBSTRATE-ATTACHED GLYCOPROTEINS MEDIATING ADHESION OF NORMAL AND VIRUS-TRANSFORMED MOUSE FIBROBLASTS

Lloyd A Culp 1
PMCID: PMC2109354  PMID: 4473137

Abstract

When BALB/c 3T3, simian virus 40 (SV40)-transformed 3T3 (SVT2), and revertant variants of the transformed cells are removed by EGTA treatment from the substrate on which they were grown, they leave behind a layer of glycoprotein which has been characterized biochemically (Terry, A. H. and L. A. Culp. 1974. Biochemistry. 13:414.)—substrate-attached material (SAM). The influence of SAM from normal and from transformed cells on cellular attachment to the substrate, morphology, movement, and growth has been examined. All three cell types displayed a 30% higher plating efficiency when grown on 3T3 SAM. The morphology of SVT2 colonies and of individual SVT2 cells was dramatically affected by growth on 3T3 SAM—the cells (a) were more highly spread on the substrate, (b) resisted crawling over neighboring cells, and (c) resisted movement away from the edge of colonies; SVT2 SAM was not effective in causing these changes. A cell-to-substrate attachment assay using thymidine-radiolabeled cells and untreated or SAM-coated cover slips was developed. SVT2 cells attached to 3T3 SAM- or SVT2 SAM-coated cover slips with a faster initial rate and to a higher saturation level than to untreated substrate, whereas 3T3 and revertant cells exhibited no preference; there was no species specificity in these cell-substrate attachment phenomena. Trypsin-released cells attached much more slowly than EGTA-released cells. 3T3 SAM, however, was not effective in lowering the saturation density of mass cultures of virus-transformed cells. These experiments suggest that the substrate-attached glycoproteins of normal cells affect the cellular adhesivity, morphology, movement, and perhaps growth patterns of virus-transformed cells—i.e., causing partial reversion of these properties of transformed cells to those found in contact-inhibited fibroblasts. A model for the involvement of substrate-attached glycoproteins in cell-to-substrate adhesion, and possibly cell-to-cell adhesion, has been proposed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (956.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burger M. M., Noonan K. D. Restoration of normal growth by covering of agglutinin sites on tumour cell surface. Nature. 1970 Nov 7;228(5271):512–515. doi: 10.1038/228512a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ceccarini C., Eagle H. pH as a determinant of cellular growth and contact inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jan;68(1):229–233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.1.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Culp L. A., Black P. H. Contact-inhibited revertant cell lines isolated from simian virus 40-transformed cells. 3. Concanavalin A-selected revertant cells. J Virol. 1972 Apr;9(4):611–620. doi: 10.1128/jvi.9.4.611-620.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Culp L. A., Black P. H. Release of macromolecules from BALB-c mouse cell lines treated with chelating agents. Biochemistry. 1972 May 23;11(11):2161–2172. doi: 10.1021/bi00761a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Culp L. A., Grimes W. J., Black P. H. Contact-inhibited revertant cell lines isolated from SV40-transformed cells. I. Biologic, virologic, and chemical properties. J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep;50(3):682–690. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diamond L. Two spontaneously transformed cell lines derived from the same hamster embryo culture. Int J Cancer. 1967 Mar 15;2(2):143–152. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910020209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eagle H., Levine E. M., Koprowski H. Species specificity in growth regulatory effects of cellular interaction. Nature. 1968 Oct 19;220(5164):266–269. doi: 10.1038/220266a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gail M. H., Boone C. W. Cell-substrate adhesivity. A determinant of cell motility. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Jan;70(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90178-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Henkart P., Humphreys S., Humphreys T. Characterization of sponge aggregation factor. A unique proteoglycan complex. Biochemistry. 1973 Jul 31;12(16):3045–3050. doi: 10.1021/bi00740a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pollack R. E., Green H., Todaro G. J. Growth control in cultured cells: selection of sublines with increased sensitivity to contact inhibition and decreased tumor-producing ability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 May;60(1):126–133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Poste G., Greenham L. W., Mallucci L., Reeve P., Alexander D. J. The study of cellular "microexudates" by ellipsometry and their relationship to the cell coat. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Apr;78(2):303–313. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Poste G. Tissue dissociation with proteolytic enzymes. Adsorption and activity of enzymes at the cell surface. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Apr;65(2):359–367. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ROSENBERG M. D. Microexudates from cells grown in tissue culture. Biophys J. 1960 Nov;1:137–159. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(60)86881-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Revel J. P., Wolken K. Electronmicroscope investigations of the underside of cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Mar 30;78(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Terry A. H., Culp L. A. Substrate-attached glycoproteins from normal and virus-transformed cells. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 29;13(3):414–425. doi: 10.1021/bi00700a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Walther B. T., Ohman R., Roseman S. A quantitative assay for intercellular adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 May;70(5):1569–1573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yaoi Y., Kanaseki T. Role of microexudate carpet in cell division. Nature. 1972 Jun 2;237(5353):283–285. doi: 10.1038/237283a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES