Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 May 1;65(2):335–358. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.2.335

Acetylcholine receptor turnover in membranes of developing muscle fibers

PMCID: PMC2109417  PMID: 236319

Abstract

[125I mono-iodo-alpha-bungarotoxin is used as a specific marker in a description of acetylcholine receptor metabolism. It is concluded that acetylcholine receptors in the surface membranes of chick and rat myotubes developing in cell cultures have a half-life of 22-24 h. Alpha-bungarotoxin (bound to a receptor which is removed from the membrane) is degraded to monoiodotyrosine which appears in the medium. Several observations are consistent with a model in which receptors or alpha-bungarotoxin-receptor complexes are internalized and then degraded: (a) the rate of appearance of iodotyrosine does not reach its maximal rate until 90 min after alpha-bungarotoxin is bound to the surface receptors; (b) 2,4-dinitrophenol, reduced temperature, and cell disruption all inhibit the degradation process. The degradation of surface receptors is not coupled to the process by which receptors are incorporated into the membrane. Evidence suggest that receptors are incorporated into the surface membrane from a presynthesized set of receptors containing about 10% as many alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites as does the surface. Additionally, a third set of acetylcholine receptors is described containing about 30% as amny binding sites as does the surface. These "hidden" recptors are not precursors yet are not readily accessible for binding of extracellular alpha-bungarotoxin. These findings are discussed in relation to both plasma membrane biosynthesis and control of chemosensitivity in developing and denervated skeletal muscle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albuquerque E. X., McIsaac R. J. Fast and slow mammalian muscles after denervation. Exp Neurol. 1970 Jan;26(1):183–202. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(70)90099-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnard E. A., Wieckowski J., Chiu T. H. Cholinergic receptor molecules and cholinesterase molecules at mouse skeletal muscle junctions. Nature. 1971 Nov 26;234(5326):207–209. doi: 10.1038/234207a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg D. K., Hall Z. W. Fate of alpha-bungarotoxin bound to acetylcholine receptors of normal and denervated muscle. Science. 1974 Apr 26;184(4135):473–475. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4135.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg D. K., Kelly R. B., Sargent P. B., Williamson P., Hall Z. W. Binding of -bungarotoxin to acetylcholine receptors in mammalian muscle (snake venom-denervated muscle-neonatal muscle-rat diaphragm-SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):147–151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpenter C. B., Gill T. J., 3rd, Mann L. T., Jr Synthetic polypeptide metabolism. 3. Degradation and organ localization of isomeric synthetic polypeptide antigens. J Immunol. 1967 Feb;98(2):236–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang C. C., Chen T. F., Chuang S. T. N,O-di and N,N,O-tri ( 3 H) acetyl -bungarotoxins as specific labelling agents of cholinergic receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1973 Jan;47(1):147–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1973.tb08169.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Changeux J. P., Kasai M., Lee C. Y. Use of a snake venom toxin to characterize the cholinergic receptor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Nov;67(3):1241–1247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.3.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DIAMOND J., MILEDI R. A study of foetal and new-born rat muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;162:393–408. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edidin M., Fambrough D. Fluidity of the surface of cultured muscle fibers. Rapid lateral diffusion of marked surface antigens. J Cell Biol. 1973 Apr;57(1):27–37. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fambrough D. M., Hartzell H. C. Acetylcholine receptors: number and distribution at neuromuscular junctions in rat diaphragm. Science. 1972 Apr 14;176(4031):189–191. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4031.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Franklin G. I., Potter L. T. Studies of the binding of -bungarotoxin to membrane-bound and detergent-dispersed acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo electric tissue. FEBS Lett. 1972 Nov 15;28(1):101–106. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(72)80687-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldberg A. L., Howell E. M., Li J. B., Martel S. B., Prouty W. F. Physiological significance of protein degradation in animal and bacterial cells. Fed Proc. 1974 Apr;33(4):1112–1120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HUNTER W. M., GREENWOOD F. C. Preparation of iodine-131 labelled human growth hormone of high specific activity. Nature. 1962 May 5;194:495–496. doi: 10.1038/194495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartzell H. C., Fambrough D. M. Acetycholine receptor production and incorporation into membranes of developing muscle fibers. Dev Biol. 1973 Jan;30(1):153–165. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartzell H. C., Fambrough D. M. Acetylcholine receptors. Distribution and extrajunctional density in rat diaphragm after denervation correlated with acetylcholine sensitivity. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Sep;60(3):248–262. doi: 10.1085/jgp.60.3.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klett R. P., Fulpius B. W., Cooper D., Smith M., Reich E., Possani L. D. The acetylcholine receptor. I. Purification and characterization of a macromolecule isolated from Electrophorus electricus. J Biol Chem. 1973 Oct 10;248(19):6841–6853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee C. Y., Tseng L. F., Chiu T. H. Influence of denervation on localization of neurotoxins from clapid venoms in rat diaphragm. Nature. 1967 Sep 9;215(5106):1177–1178. doi: 10.1038/2151177a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee H. H., Kaighn M. E., Ebert J. D. Induction of thymidine-3H incorporation in multinucleated myotubes by Rous sarcoma virus. Int J Cancer. 1968 Jan 15;3(1):126–136. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910030115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Libelius R. Binding of 3H-labelled cobra neurotoxin to cholinergic receptors in fast and slow mammalian muscles. J Neural Transm. 1974;35(2):137–149. doi: 10.1007/BF01250741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McArdle J. J., Albuquerque E. X. A study of the reinnervation of fast and slow mammalian muscles. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jan;61(1):1–23. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meunier J. C., Olsen R. W., Menez A., Fromageot P., Boquet P., Changeux J. P. Some physical properties of the cholinergic receptor protein from Electrophorus electricus revealed by a tritiated alpha-toxin from Naja nigricollis venom. Biochemistry. 1972 Mar 28;11(7):1200–1210. doi: 10.1021/bi00757a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miledi R., Molinoff P., Potter L. T. Isolation of the cholinergic receptor protein of Torpedo electric tissue. Nature. 1971 Feb 19;229(5286):554–557. doi: 10.1038/229554a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miledi R., Potter L. T. Acetylcholine receptors in muscle fibres. Nature. 1971 Oct 29;233(5322):599–603. doi: 10.1038/233599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Oliver J. M., Ukena T. E., Berlin R. D. Effects of phagocytosis and colchicine on the distribution of lectin-binding sites on cell surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Feb;71(2):394–398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.2.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Patrick J., Heinemann S. F., Lindstrom J., Schubert D., Steinbach J. H. Appearance of acetylcholine receptors during differentiation of a myogenic cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Oct;69(10):2762–2766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.10.2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Prives J. M., Paterson B. M. Differentiation of cell membranes in cultures of embryonic chick breast muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):3208–3211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Raftery M. A., Schmidt J., Clark D. G. Specificity of -bungarotoxin binding to Torpedo californica electroplax. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1972 Oct;152(2):882–886. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(72)90285-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Raftery M. A., Schmidt J., Clark D. G., Wolcott R. G. Demonstration of a specific -bungarotoxin binding component in electrophorus electricus electroplax membranes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971 Dec 17;45(6):1622–1629. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(71)90207-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reporter M., Raveed D. Plasma membranes: isolation from naturally fused and lysolecithin-treated muscle cells. Science. 1973 Aug 31;181(4102):863–865. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4102.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmidt J., Raftery M. A. A simple assay for the study of solubilized acetylcholine receptors. Anal Biochem. 1973 Apr;52(2):349–354. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sytkowski A. J., Vogel Z., Nirenberg M. W. Development of acetylcholine receptor clusters on cultured muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Jan;70(1):270–274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.1.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Warren L., Glick M. C. Membranes of animal cells. II. The metabolism and turnover of the surface membrane. J Cell Biol. 1968 Jun;37(3):729–746. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yaffe D. Retention of differentiation potentialities during prolonged cultivation of myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):477–483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES