Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 May 1;65(2):439–462. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.2.439

Studies of intercellular invasion in vitro using rabbit peritoneal neutrophil granulocytes (PMNS). I. Role of contact inhibition of locomotion

PMCID: PMC2109426  PMID: 1092702

Abstract

Intercellular invasion is the active migration of cells on one type into the interiors of tissues composed of cells of dissimilar cell types. Contact paralysis of locomotion is the cessation of forward extension of the pseudopods of a cell as a result of its collision with another cell. One hypothesis to account for intercellular invasion proposes that a necessary condition for a cell type to be invasive to a given host tissue is that it lack contact paralysis of locomotion during collision with cells of that host tissue. The hypothesis has been tested using rabbit peritoneal neutrophil granulocytes (PMNs) as the invasive cell type and chick embryo fibroblasts as the host tissue. In organ culture, PMNs rapidly invade aggregates of fibroblasts. The behavior of the pseudopods of PMNs during collision with fibroblasts was analyzed for contact paralysis by a study of time-lapse films of cells in mixed monolayer culture. In monolayer culture, PMNs show little sign of paralysis of the pseudopods upon collision with fibroblasts and thus conform in their behavior to that predicted by the hypothesis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABERCROMBIE M., AMBROSE E. J. Interference microscope studies of cell contacts in tissue culture. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Oct;15(2):332–345. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ABERCROMBIE M., AMBROSE E. J. The surface properties of cancer cells: a review. Cancer Res. 1962 Jun;22:525–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ABERCROMBIE M., HEAYSMAN J. E., KARTHAUSER H. M. Social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. III. Mutual influence of sarcoma cells and fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Oct;13(2):276–291. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ABERCROMBIE M., HEAYSMAN J. E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1954 May;6(2):293–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90176-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ABERCROMBIE M. The bases of the locomotory behaviour of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1961;Suppl 8:188–198. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90348-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ALLISON F., Jr, SMITH M. R., WOOD W. B., Jr Studies on the pathogenesis of acute inflammation. I. The inflammatory reaction to thermal injury as observed in the rabbit ear chamber. J Exp Med. 1955 Dec 1;102(6):655–668. doi: 10.1084/jem.102.6.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. AMBROSE E. J. The movements of fibrocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1961;Suppl 8:54–73. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90340-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ASHWORTH C. T., STEMBRIDGE V. A., LUIBEL F. J. Symposium on probable or possible malignant cervical lesions - carcinoma in situ. I. Histology of carcinoma in situ. A study of basement membranes of normal epithelium, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of uterine cervix utilizing electron microscopy and histochemical methods. Acta Cytol. 1961 Sep-Oct;5:369–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Abercrombie M. Contact inhibition in tissue culture. In Vitro. 1970 Sep-Oct;6(2):128–142. doi: 10.1007/BF02616114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Abercrombie M. Contact inhibition: the phenomenon and its biological implications. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1967 Sep;26:249–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. 3. Movements of particles on the dorsal surface of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Oct;62(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90570-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jun;60(3):437–444. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90537-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Aug;67(2):359–367. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90420-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Armstrong P. B. A fine structural study of adhesive cell junctions in heterotypic cell aggregates. J Cell Biol. 1970 Oct;47(1):197–210. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Armstrong P. B., Armstrong M. T. Are cells in solid tissues immobile? Mesonephric mesenchyme studied in vitro. Dev Biol. 1973 Dec;35(2):187–209. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Armstrong P. B., Niederman R. Reversal of tissue position after cell sorting. Dev Biol. 1972 Jul;28(3):518–527. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90034-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Babai F., Tremblay G. Ultrastructural study of liver invasion by Novikoff hepatoma. Cancer Res. 1972 Dec;32(12):2765–2770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Boyde A., Weiss R. A., Veselý P. Scanning electron microscopy of cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71(2):313–324. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90299-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Butterworth S. T. Changes in liver lysosomes and cell junctions close to an invasive tumour. J Pathol. 1970 Jul;101(3):227–232. doi: 10.1002/path.1711010304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. CURTIS A. S. THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS. A STUDY BY INTERFERENCE REFLECTION MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Feb;20:199–215. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.2.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cliff W. J. The acute inflammatory reaction in the rabbit ear chamber with particular reference to the phenomenon of leukocytic migration. J Exp Med. 1966 Oct 1;124(4):543–556. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.4.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Culbertson C. G. The pathogenicity of soil amebas. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:231–254. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.001311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. DiPasquale A., Bell P. B., Jr The upper cell surface: its inability to support active cell movement in culture. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jul;62(1):198–214. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.1.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dye F. J. The in vitro movement of mammalian epithelial cells. Oncology. 1971;25(1):79–82. doi: 10.1159/000224557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Elsdale T., Bard J. Cellular interactions in mass cultures of human diploid fibroblasts. Nature. 1972 Mar 24;236(5343):152–155. doi: 10.1038/236152a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Enders A. C., Schlafke S. Implantation in the ferret: epithelial penetration. Am J Anat. 1972 Mar;133(3):291–315. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001330305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. FISHER E. R., FISHER B. Electron microscopic, histologic, and histochemical features of the Walker carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1961 May;21:527–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. FLOREY H. W., GRANT L. H. Leucocyte migration from small blood vessels stimulated with ultraviolet light: an electron-microscope study. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1961 Jul;82:13–17. doi: 10.1002/path.1700820103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. GRAHAM R. C., Jr, EBERT R. H., RATNOFF O. D., MOSES J. M. PATHOGENESIS OF INFLAMMATION. II. IN VIVO OBSERVATIONS OF THE INFLAMMATORY EFFECTS OF ACTIVATED HAGEMAN FACTOR AND BRADYKININ. J Exp Med. 1965 May 1;121:807–818. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.5.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. GRANT L., PALMER P., SANDERS A. G. The effect of heparin on the sticking of white cells to endothelium in inflammation. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1962 Jan;83:127–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Garrod D. R., Steinberg M. S. Tissue-specific sorting-out in two dimensions in relation to contact inhibition of cell movement. Nature. 1973 Aug 31;244(5418):568–569. doi: 10.1038/244568a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guelstein V. I., Ivanova O. Y., Margolis L. B., Vasiliev J. M., Gelfand I. M. Contact inhibition of movement in the cultures of transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Jul;70(7):2011–2014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.7.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. HURLEY J. V. SUBSTANCES PROMOTING LEUKOCYTE EMIGRATION. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Aug 27;116:918–935. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb52558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harris A. Location of cellular adhesions to solid substrata. Dev Biol. 1973 Nov;35(1):97–114. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Heaysman J. E. Non-reciprocal contact inhibition. Experientia. 1970 Dec 15;26(12):1344–1345. doi: 10.1007/BF02113020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. Early contacts between fibroblasts. An ultrastructural study. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Mar 30;78(1):71–78. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. Early contacts between normal fibroblasts and mouse sarcoma cells. An ultrastructural study. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Apr;78(2):479–481. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ingram V. M. A side view of moving fibroblasts. Nature. 1969 May 17;222(5194):641–644. doi: 10.1038/222641a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. LUIBEL F. J., SANDERS E., ASHWORTH C. T. An electron microscopic study of carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Cancer Res. 1960 Apr;20:357–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lackie J. M. The aggregation of rabbit polymorphonuclear leucocytes: effects of antimitotic agents, cyclic nucleotides and methyl xanthines. J Cell Sci. 1974 Oct;16(1):167–180. doi: 10.1242/jcs.16.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. MARCHESI V. T., FLOREY H. W. Electron micrographic observations on the emigration of leucocytes. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1960 Oct;45:343–348. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1960.sp001489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mao P., Nakao K., Angrist A. Human prostatic carcinoma: an electron microscope study. Cancer Res. 1966 May;26(5):955–973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Martz E. Contact inhibition of speed in 3T3 and its independence from postconfluence inhibition of cell division. J Cell Physiol. 1973 Feb;81(1):39–48. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040810105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Martz E., Phillips H. M., Steinberg M. S. Contact inhibitions of overlapping and differential cell adhesion: a sufficient model for the control of certain cell culture morphologies. J Cell Sci. 1974 Nov;16(2):401–419. doi: 10.1242/jcs.16.2.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Martz E., Steinberg M. S. Contact inhibition of what? An analytical review. J Cell Physiol. 1973 Feb;81(1):25–37. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040810104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Martz E., Steinberg M. S. Movement in a confluent 3T3 monolayer and the causes of contact inhibition of overlapping. J Cell Sci. 1974 Jun;15(1):201–216. doi: 10.1242/jcs.15.1.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. NEAL R. A. Enzymic proteolysis by Entamoeba histolytica; biochemical characteristics and relationship with invasiveness. Parasitology. 1960 Nov;50:531–550. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000025610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. NILSSON O. Electron microscopy of the human endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1962 May;22:492–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Niederman R., Armstrong P. B. Is abnormal limb bud morphology in the mutant talpid 2 chick embryo a result of altered intercellular adhesion? Studies employing cell sorting and fragment fusion. J Exp Zool. 1972 Jul;181(1):17–32. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401810103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. OLDFIELD F. E. Orientation behavior of chick leucocytes in tissue culture and their interactions with fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Mar;30:125–138. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90219-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ozzello L., Sanpitak P. Epithelial-stromal junction of intraductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer. 1970 Dec;26(6):1186–1198. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197012)26:6<1186::aid-cncr2820260603>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Phillips H. M., Steinberg M. S. Equilibrium measurements of embryonic chick cell adhesiveness. I. Shape equilibrium in centrifugal fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Sep;64(1):121–127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Polinger I. S. Separation of cell types in embryonic heart cell cultures. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Nov;63(1):78–82. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90333-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Proctor E. M., Gregory M. A. The observation of a surface active lysosome in the trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica from the human colon. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1972 Sep;66(3):339–342. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1972.11686833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ramsey W. S. Locomotion of human polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Jun;72(2):489–501. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Riley P. A., Seal P. Micro-invasion of epidermis caused by substituted anisoles. Nature. 1968 Nov 30;220(5170):922–923. doi: 10.1038/220922a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Seal P., Riley P. A., Inman D. R. Basal cell encroachment into the dermis caused by applications of hydroxyanisole. J Invest Dermatol. 1969 Mar;52(3):264–267. doi: 10.1038/jid.1969.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Spooner B. S., Yamada K. M., Wessells N. K. Microfilaments and cell locomotion. J Cell Biol. 1971 Jun;49(3):595–613. doi: 10.1083/jcb.49.3.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sugár F. An electron microscopic study of early invasive growth in human skin tumours and laryngeal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 1968 Mar;4(1):33–38. doi: 10.1016/0014-2964(68)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tarin D. Sequential electron microscopical study of experimental mouse skin carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer. 1967 May 15;2(3):195–211. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910020302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Trinkaus J. P., Betchaku T., Krulikowski L. S. Local inhibition of ruffling during contact inhibition of cell movement. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Feb;64(2):291–300. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90079-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Veselý P., Weiss R. A. Cell locomotion and contact inhibition of normal and neoplastic rat cells. Int J Cancer. 1973 Jan 15;11(1):64–76. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910110108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Walther B. T., Ohman R., Roseman S. A quantitative assay for intercellular adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 May;70(5):1569–1573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Weston J. A., Abercrombie M. Cell mobility in fused homo- and heteronomic tissue fragments. J Exp Zool. 1967 Apr;164(3):317–323. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401640303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wiseman L. L., Steinberg M. S. The movement of single cells within solid tissue masses. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Jun;79(2):468–471. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90473-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wolpert L., Gingell D. Cell surface membrane and amoeboid movement. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1968;22:169–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Woods D. A., Smith C. J. Ultrastructure of the dermal-epidermal junction in experimentally induced tumors and human oral lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 1969 Mar;52(3):259–263. doi: 10.1038/jid.1969.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES