Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 Jun 1;65(3):631–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.3.631

The fate and origin of the nuclear envelope during and after mitosis in Amoeba proteus. I. Synthesis and behavior of phospholipids of the nuclear envelope during the cell life cycle

PMCID: PMC2109443  PMID: 805790

Abstract

The synthesis and behavior of Amoeba proteus nuclear envelope (NE) phospholipids were studied. Most NE phospholipid synthesis occurs during G2 and little during mitosis or S. (A. proteus has no G1 phase). Autoradiographic observations after implantation of [3-H] choline nuclei into unlabeled cells reveal little turnover of NE phospholipid during interphase but during mitosis all the label is dispersed through the cytoplasm. Beginning at telophase all the label is dispersed through the cytoplasm. Beginning at telophase all the NE phospholipid label returns to the daughter NEs. This observation, along with the finding that no NE phospholipid synthesis occurs during mitosis or S, indicates that no de novo NE phospholipid production is required for newly forming NEs. Similarlyemetine, at concentrations that inhibit 97 percent of protein synthesis, does not prevent the post mitotic formation of NEs, suggesting that previously manufactured proteins are used in making new NEs. If a nucleus containing labeled NE phospholipids is transplanted into an unlabeled nucleate cell and the cell is allowed to grow and divide, the resultant four nuclei are equally labeled. This finding supports, but does not prove (see next paragraph), the conclusion that there probably is no continuity of the A. proteus NE during mitosis. When a phospholipid-labeled nucleus is implanted into a cell in mitosis, the grafted nucleus is not induced to enter mitosis. There is, however, a marked increase in the turnover of that nucleus's NE phospholipids with no apparent breakdown of the NE; this indicated that the mitotic cytoplasm possesses a factor that stimulates NE phospholipid exchange with the cytoplasm. That enhanced turnover is not accompanied by visible structural alteration makes less certain the earlier conclusion that no NE continuity exists during mitosis. Perhaps the most important finding in this study is that there are present, at restricted times in the cell cycle, factors capable of inducing accelerated exchange of structural components without microscopically detectable disruptions of structure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLIGH E. G., DYER W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959 Aug;37(8):911–917. doi: 10.1139/o59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BYERS T. J., PLATT D. B., GOLDSTEIN L. THE CYTONUCLEOPROTEINS OF AMEBAE. I. SOME CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND INTRACELLULAR DISTRIBUTION. J Cell Biol. 1963 Dec;19:453–466. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.3.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chlapowski F. J., Band R. N. Assembly of lipids into membranes in Acanthamoeba palestinensis. I. Observations on the specificity and stability of choline- 14 C and glycerol- 3 H as labels for membrane phospholipids. J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep;50(3):625–633. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Feldherr C. M. Changes in the nuclear envelope of Amoeba during mitosis. Nature. 1968 Apr 13;218(5137):184–185. doi: 10.1038/218184a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flickinger C. J. The fine structure of the nuclear envelope in amebae: alterations following nuclear transplantation. Exp Cell Res. 1970 May;60(2):225–236. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90509-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flickinger C. J. The role of endoplasmic reticulum in the repair of Amoeba nuclear envelopes damaged microsurgically. J Cell Sci. 1974 Mar;14(2):421–437. doi: 10.1242/jcs.14.2.421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GOLDSTEIN L. Localization of nucleusspecific protein as shown by transplantation experiments in Amoeba proteus. Exp Cell Res. 1958 Dec;15(3):635–637. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldstein L., Prescott D. M. Proteins in nucleocytoplasmic interactions. I. The fundamental characteristics of the rapidly migrating proteins and the slow turnover proteins of the Amoeba proteus nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jun;33(3):637–644. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grollman A. P. Inhibitors of protein biosynthesis. V. Effects of emetine on protein and nucleic acid biosynthesis in HeLa cells. J Biol Chem. 1968 Aug 10;243(15):4089–4094. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. JONES O. P. De novo origin of the nuclear membrane. Nature. 1960 Oct 15;188:239–240. doi: 10.1038/188239a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeon K. W., Lorch I. J. Lethal effect of heterologous nuclei in amoeba heterokaryons. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Aug;56(2):233–238. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90007-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jeon K. W., Lorch I. J. New simple method of micrurgy on living cells. Nature. 1968 Feb 3;217(5127):463–463. doi: 10.1038/217463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson R. T., Rao P. N. Mammalian cell fusion: induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase nuclei. Nature. 1970 May 23;226(5247):717–722. doi: 10.1038/226717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Masui Y., Markert C. L. Cytoplasmic control of nuclear behavior during meiotic maturation of frog oocytes. J Exp Zool. 1971 Jun;177(2):129–145. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401770202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsui S. I., Yoshida H., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Induction of prophase in interphase nuclei by fusion with metaphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jul;54(1):120–132. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.1.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PORTER K. R., MACHADO R. D. Studies on the endoplasmic reticulum. IV. Its form and distribution during mitosis in cells of onion root tip. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Feb;7:167–180. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.1.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PRESCOTT D. M., BENDER M. A. SYNTHESIS AND BEHAVIOR OF NUCLEAR PROTEINS DURING THE CELL LIFE CYCLE. J Cell Physiol. 1963 Oct;62:SUPPL1–SUPPL1:194. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030620415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Prescott D., Goldstein L. Proteins in nucleocytoplasmic interactions. 3. Redistributions of nuclear proteins during and following mitosis in Amoeba proteus. J Cell Biol. 1968 Nov;39(2):404–414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.2.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. ROTH L. E., OBETZ S. W., DANIELS E. W. Electron microscopic studies of mitosis in amebae. I. Amoeba proteus. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Sep;8:207–220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.8.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES