Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 Sep 1;66(3):461–469. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.3.461

Absence of ribosomal DNA amplification in the meroistic (telotrophic) ovary of the large milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)

PMCID: PMC2109451  PMID: 1158969

Abstract

In the typical meroistic insect ovary, the oocyte nucleus synthesizes little if any RNA. Nurse cells or trophocytes actively synthesize ribosomes which are transported to and accumulated by the oocyte. In the telotrophic ovary a morphological separation exists, the nurse cells being localized at the apical end of each ovariole and communicating with the ooocytes via nutritive cords. In order to determine whether the genes coding for ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are amplified in the telotrophic ovary of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus, the percentages of the genome coding for ribosomal RNA in somatic cells, spermatogenic cells, ovarian follicles, and nurse cells were compared. The oocytes and most of the nurse cells of O. fasciatus are uninucleolate. DNA hybridizing with ribosomal RNA is localized in a satellite DNA, the density of which is 1.712 g/cm(-3). The density of main-band DNA is 1.694 g/cm(-3). The ribosomal DNA satellite accounts for approximately 0.2% of the DNA in somatic and gametogenic tissues of both males and females. RNA-DNA hybridization analysis demonstrates that approximately 0.03% of the DNA in somatic tissues, testis, ovarian follicles, and isolated nurse cells hybridizes with ribosomal RNA. The fact that the percentage of DNA hybridizing with rRNA is the same in somatic and in male and female gametogenic tissues indicates that amplification of ribosomal DNA does not occur in nurse cells and that if it occurs in oocytes, it represents less than a 50- fold increase in ribosomal DNA. An increase in total genome DNA accounted by polyploidization appears to provide for increasing the amount of ribosomal DNA in the nurse cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BROWN D. D., GURDON J. B. ABSENCE OF RIBOSOMAL RNA SYNTHESIS IN THE ANUCLEOLATE MUTANT OF XENOPUS LAEVIS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Jan;51:139–146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROWN D. D., LITTNA E. RNA SYNTHESIS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF XENOPUS LAEVIS, THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLAWED TOAD. J Mol Biol. 1964 May;8:669–687. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80116-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bier K., Kunz W., Ribbert D. Struktur und Funktion der Oocytenchromosomen und Nukleolen sowie der Extra-DNS während der Oogenese panoistischer und meroistischer Insekten. Chromosoma. 1967;23(2):214–254. doi: 10.1007/BF00331114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bier K. Oogenese, das Wachstum von Riesenzellen. Naturwissenschaften. 1967 Apr;54(8):189–195. doi: 10.1007/BF00594513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown D. D., Dawid I. B. Specific gene amplification in oocytes. Oocyte nuclei contain extrachromosomal replicas of the genes for ribosomal RNA. Science. 1968 Apr 19;160(3825):272–280. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3825.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cave M. D., Allen E. R. Extra-chromosomal DNA in early stages of oogenesis in Acheta domesticus. J Cell Sci. 1969 May;4(3):593–609. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.3.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cave M. D., Allen E. R. Synthesis of nucleic acids associated with a DNA-containing body in oocytes of Acheta. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Dec;58(2):201–212. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90498-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cave M. D. Localization of ribosomal DNA within oocytes of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Cell Biol. 1972 Nov;55(2):310–321. doi: 10.1083/jcb.55.2.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cave M. D. Synthesis and characterization of amplified DNA in oocytes of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Chromosoma. 1973 May 14;42(1):1–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00326327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dawid I. B., Brown D. D., Reeder R. H. Composition and structure of chromosomal and amplified ribosomal DNA's of Xenopus laevis. J Mol Biol. 1970 Jul 28;51(2):341–360. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90147-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dawid I. B., Brown D. D. The mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA components of oocytes of Urechis caupo. Dev Biol. 1970 May;22(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(70)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gall J. G. Differential synthesis of the genes for ribosomal RNA during amphibian oögenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Jun;60(2):553–560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.2.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gall J. G., Macgregor H. C., Kidston M. E. Gene amplification in the oocytes of Dytiscid water beetles. Chromosoma. 1969;26(2):169–187. doi: 10.1007/BF00326453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gall J. G. The genes for ribosomal RNA during oögenesis. Genetics. 1969;61(1 Suppl):121–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hennig W., Meer B. Reduced polyteny of ribosomal RNA cistrons in giant chromosomes of Drosophila hydei. Nat New Biol. 1971 Sep 15;233(37):70–72. doi: 10.1038/newbio233070a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hughes M., Berry S. J. The synthesis and secretion of ribosomes by nurse cells of Antheraea polyphemus. Dev Biol. 1970 Dec;23(4):651–664. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(70)90145-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kato K. Cytochemistry and fine structure of elimination chromatin in Dytiscidae. Exp Cell Res. 1968 Oct;52(2):507–522. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90492-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koch E. A., Smith P. A., King R. C. The division and differentiation of Drosophila cystocytes. J Morphol. 1967 Jan;121(1):55–70. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051210106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kunz W. Die Entstehung multipler Oocytennukleolen aus akzessorischen DNS-Körpern bei Gryllus domesticus. Chromosoma. 1969;26(1):41–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00319499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kunz W. Lampenbürstenchromosomen und multiple Nukleolen bei Orthopteren. Chromosoma. 1967;21(4):446–462. doi: 10.1007/BF00336952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lagowski J. M., Yu M. Y., Forrest H. S., Laird C. D. Dispersity of repeat DNA sequences in Oncopeltus fasciatus, an organism with diffuse centromeres. Chromosoma. 1973;43(4):349–373. doi: 10.1007/BF00406743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lima-de-Faria A., Moses M. J. Ultrastructure and cytochemistry of metabolic DNA in Tipula. J Cell Biol. 1966 Jul;30(1):177–192. doi: 10.1083/jcb.30.1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mohan J., Ritossa F. M. Regulation of ribosomal RNA synthesis and its bearing on the bobbed phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1970 Jul;22(3):495–512. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(70)90165-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ribbert D., Bier K. Multiple nucleoli and enhanced nucleolar activity in the nurse cells of the insect ovary. Chromosoma. 1969;27(2):178–197. doi: 10.1007/BF00326143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sinclair J. H., Brown D. D. Retention of common nucleotide sequences in the ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid of eukaryotes and some of their physical characteristics. Biochemistry. 1971 Jul 6;10(14):2761–2769. doi: 10.1021/bi00790a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ullman J. S., Lima-de-Faria A., Jaworska H., Bryngelsson T. Amplification of ribosomal DNA in Acheta. V. Hybridization of RNA complementary to ribosomal DNA with pachytene chromosomes. Hereditas. 1973;74(1):13–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1973.tb01100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vincent W. S., Halvorson H. O., Chen H. R., Shin D. A comparison of ribosomal gene amplification in uni- and multinucleolate oocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Oct;57(2):240–250. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90147-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zinsmeister P. P., Davenport R. An autoradiographic and cytochemical study of cellular interactions during oogenesis in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Aug;67(2):273–278. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90409-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES