Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 Feb 1;64(2):378–388. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.378

Detection by means of cell fusion of macromolecular synthesis involved in the reconstruction of the nuclear envelope in mitosis

PMCID: PMC2109493  PMID: 163831

Abstract

Using the cultured Chinese hamster cell line Don, G1 or S or a mixture of late-S/G2 cells were prepared by release from metaphase arrest. Metaphase (M) cells were also obtained by mitotic arrest of log-phase cultures with Colcemid and held in metaphase; such M cells remained untreated with any other compound and were termed standard M cells. When interphase (I) cells were fused at pH 8.0 and 37 degrees C with standard cells in the presence of Colcemid by means of UV-inactivated Sendai virus, binucleate interphase-metaphase (I-M) cells were obtained. In a given I-M cell there occurred within 30 min after fusion either prophasing of the I nucleus or formation of a nuclear envelope (NE) around the chromosomes. About 20% of early G1 cells, 35% of cells at the G1/S boundary, 50% of S cells, and 70% of late S/G2 cells could induce NE formation. If, before fusion, cycloheximide (CHE), an inhibitor of protein synthesis, was present during release from M arrest, the cells entered G1 but not S. About 20% of such early G1 cells, like the untreated early G1 cells, had the capacity to induce NE formation during subsequent fusion. If the cells were blocked in S with 5 mM thymidine (TdR), At least 80% of these cells could induce NE formation during subsequent fusion, but in the presence of both TdR and CHE only 35% could do so. It appeared, therefore, that protein synthesis in interphase was required for NE formation. Experiments with actinomycin D indicated that RNA synthesis was also necessary for acquisition of NE-inducing capacity. About 35% of G1 cells from confluent monolayers had the NE-inducing capacity, but prolonged exposure to CHE reduced their number to 8% . Removal of CHE restored the ability while the cells still remained in G1. This result indicated that continuing protein synthesis in the G1 cell was needed for NE formation subsequent to fusion. The fact that macromolecular synthesis must occur in the I cell before fusion if NE formation was to occur in the fused I-M cell lends further support to evidence adduced earlier that this phenomenon is a normal mitotic event. Prophasing of the I nucleus in I-M cells did not appear to be dependent on macromolecular synthesis in the I cell; earlier results from this laboratory showed, however, that protein synthesis in the prior G2 period of the M cell of the I-M pair was required for prophasing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cohen L. S., Studzinski G. P. Correlation between cell enlargement and nucleic acid and protein content of HeLa cells in unbalanced growth produced by inhibitors of DNA synthesis. J Cell Physiol. 1967 Jun;69(3):331–339. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040690309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cummins J. E., Blomquist J. C., Rusch H. P. Anaphase delay after inhibition of protein synthesis between late prophase and prometaphase. Science. 1966 Dec 9;154(3754):1343–1344. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3754.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ikeuchi T., Sanbe M., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Induction of nuclear envelopes around metaphase chromosomes after fusion with interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1971 Oct;51(1):104–115. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.1.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson R. T., Rao P. N., Hughes H. D. Mammalian cell fusion. 3. A HeLa cell inducer of premature chromosome condensation active in cells from a variety of animal species. J Cell Physiol. 1970 Oct;76(2):151–157. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040760204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson R. T., Rao P. N. Mammalian cell fusion: induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase nuclei. Nature. 1970 May 23;226(5247):717–722. doi: 10.1038/226717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kato H., Sandberg A. A. Chromosome pulverization in chinese hamster cells induced by Sendai virus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968 Nov;41(5):1117–1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Matsui S. I., Yoshida H., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Induction of prophase in interphase nuclei by fusion with metaphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jul;54(1):120–132. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.1.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Matsui S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Dependence of chromosome pulverization in virus-fused cells on events in the G2 period. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1971 Aug;47(2):401–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matsui S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Fate of chromatin of interphase nuclei subjected to "phosphasing" in virus-fused cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972 Dec;49(6):1621–1630. doi: 10.1093/jnci/49.6.1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyn R. E., Hewitt R. R., Humphrey R. M. Evaluation of S phase synchronization by analysis of DNA replication in 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Nov;82(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90255-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore G. E., Ito E., Ulrich K., Sandberg A. A. Culture of human leukemia cells. Cancer. 1966 May;19(5):713–723. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196605)19:5<713::aid-cncr2820190518>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Obara Y., Chai L. S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Prophasing of interphase nuclei and induction of nuclear envelopes around metaphase chromosomes in HeLa and Chinese hamster homo- and heterokaryons. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jul;62(1):104–113. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.1.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Obara Y., Chai L. S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Synchronization of events in fused interphase-metaphase binucleate cells: progression of the telophase-like nucleus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974 Jul;53(1):247–259. doi: 10.1093/jnci/53.1.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Obara Y., Yoshida H., Chai L. S., Weinfeld H., Sandberg A. A. Contrast between the environmental pH dependencies of prophasing and nuclear membrane formation in interphase-metaphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1973 Sep;58(3):608–617. doi: 10.1083/jcb.58.3.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PETERSEN D. F., ANDERSON E. C. QUANTITY PRODUCTION OF SYNCHRONIZED MAMMALIAN CELLS IN SUSPENSION CULTURE. Nature. 1964 Aug 8;203:642–643. doi: 10.1038/203642a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pestka S. Inhibitors of ribosome functions. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:487–562. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SIEGEL M. R., SISLER H. D. SITE OF ACTION OF CYCLOHEXIMIDE IN CELLS OF SACCHAROMYCES PASTORIANUS. I. EFFECT OF THE ANTIBIOTIC ON CELLULAR METABOLISM. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 May 18;87:70–82. doi: 10.1016/0926-6550(64)90048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sandberg A. A., Aya T., Ikeuchi T., Weinfeld H. Definition and morphologic features of chromosome pulverization: a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 Oct;45(4):615–623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stenman S., Saksela E. The relationship of Sendai virus-induced chromosome pulverization to cell cyclus in HeLa cells. Hereditas. 1971;69(1):1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1971.tb02412.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stubblefield E., Klevecz R. Synchronization of Chinese hamster cells by reversal of colcemid inhibition. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Dec;40(3):660–664. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90244-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Studzinski G. P., Lambert W. C. Thymidine as a synchronizing agent. I. Nucleic acid and protein formation in synchronous HeLa cultures treated with excess thymidine. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Apr;73(2):109–117. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040730204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tobey R. A., Ley K. D. Regulation of initiation of DNA synthesis in Chinese hamster cells. I. Production of stable, reversible G1-arrested populations in suspension culture. J Cell Biol. 1970 Jul;46(1):151–157. doi: 10.1083/jcb.46.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tobey R. A., Petersen D. F., Anderson E. C., Puck T. T. Life cycle analysis of mammalian cells. 3. The inhibition of division in Chinese hamster cells by puromycin and actinomycin. Biophys J. 1966 Sep;6(5):567–581. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(66)86678-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Unakul W., Johnson R. T., Rao P. N., Hsu T. C. Giemsa banding in prematurely condensed chromosomes obtained by cell fusion. Nat New Biol. 1973 Mar 28;242(117):106–107. doi: 10.1038/newbio242106a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yamada M., Hanaoka F. Periodic changes in the association of mammalian DNA with the membrane during the cell cycle. Nat New Biol. 1973 Jun 20;243(129):227–230. doi: 10.1038/newbio243227a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES