Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 Jul 1;66(1):114–127. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.1.114

Pressure-induced depolymerization of spindle microtubules. II. Thermodynamics of in vivo spindle assembly

PMCID: PMC2109512  PMID: 1170171

Abstract

The present experiments were designed to test whether the simple equilibrium assembly model proposed by Inoue could predict variations in spindle microtubule assembly in response to changes in hydrostatic pressure as it does for changes in temperature. The results were also analyzed according to a model based on nucleated condensation polymerization since this recently appears to be the mechanism by which purified brain microtubules are assembled in vitro. Equilibrium birefringence (BR) of the meiotic metaphase-arrested spindle was measured in vivo as a function of hydrostatic pressure and temperature in Chaetopterus oocytes using a miniature microscope pressure chamber. Increasing pressure in steps to 3,000 psi at temperatures below 22 degrees C did produce decreases in spindle equilibrium BR predictable directly from the simple equilibrium model of spindle assembly. Thermodynamic analysis of the pressure data yielded a value of delta V congruent to 400 ml/mol of polymerizing unit. Theoretical curves based on the nucleated condensation model can also be made to fit the data, but semilog plots of the dependence of the equilibrium constant versus pressure and versus reciprocal temperature are biphasic, suggesting that either the size of the polymerizing unit changes or more than one equilibrium constant governs the assembly reaction. That the same value of delta V, 90 ml/mol, was estimated from both the majority of the spindle BR data and data for the assembly of neural microtubules in vitro supports the possibility that spindle microtubules are assembled by a nucleated condensation mechanism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Behnke O., Forer A. Evidence for four classes of microtubules in individual cells. J Cell Sci. 1967 Jun;2(2):169–192. doi: 10.1242/jcs.2.2.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brinkley B. R., Cartwright J., Jr Ultrastructural analysis of mitotic spindle elongation in mammalian cells in vitro. Direct microtubule counts. J Cell Biol. 1971 Aug;50(2):416–431. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.2.416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burkholder G. D., Okada T. A., Comings D. E. Whole mount electron microscopy of metaphase. I. Chromosomes and microtubules from mouse oocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Dec;75(2):497–511. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90458-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cande W. Z., Snyder J., Smith D., Summers K., McIntosh J. R. A functional mitotic spindle prepared from mammalian cells in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1559–1563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen W. D., Rebhun L. I. An estimate of the amount of microtubule protein in the isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Sci. 1970 Jan;6(1):159–176. doi: 10.1242/jcs.6.1.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FORER A. LOCAL REDUCTION OF SPINDLE FIBER BIREFRINGENCE IN LIVING NEPHROTOMA SUTURALIS (LOEW) SPERMATOCYTES INDUCED BY ULTRAVIOLET MICROBEAM IRRADIATION. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaskin F., Cantor C. R., Shelanski M. L. Turbidimetric studies of the in vitro assembly and disassembly of porcine neurotubules. J Mol Biol. 1974 Nov 15;89(4):737–755. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerber B. R., Asakura S., Oosawa F. Effect of temperature on the in vitro assembly of bacterial flagella. J Mol Biol. 1973 Mar 15;74(4):467–487. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90040-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gerber B. R., Noguchi H. Volume change associated with the G-F transformation of flagellin. J Mol Biol. 1967 Jun 14;26(2):197–210. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90291-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldman R. D., Rebhun L. I. The structure and some properties of the isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Sci. 1969 Jan;4(1):179–209. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.1.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ikkai T., Ooi T., Noguchi H. Actin: volume change on transformation of G-form to F-form. Science. 1966 Jun 24;152(3730):1756–1757. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3730.1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Inoué S., Borisy G. G., Kiehart D. P. Growth and lability of Chaetopterus oocyte mitotic spindles isolated in the presence of porcine brain tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jul;62(1):175–184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KANE R. E. THE MITOTIC APPARATUS. PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL FACTORS CONTROLLING STABILITY. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:144. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kasai M. Thermodynamical aspect of G-F transformations of actin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Jun 24;180(2):399–409. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(69)90124-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khalil M. T., Lauffer M. A. Polymerization-depolymerization of tobacco mosaic virus protein. X. Effect of D20. Biochemistry. 1967 Aug;6(8):2474–2480. doi: 10.1021/bi00860a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirschner M. W., Williams R. C. The mechanism of microtubule assembly in vitro. J Supramol Struct. 1974;2(2-4):412–428. doi: 10.1002/jss.400020229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. LaFountain J. R., Jr Birefringence and fine structure of spindles in spermatocytes of Nephrotoma suturalis at metaphase of first meiotic division. J Ultrastruct Res. 1974 Feb;46(2):268–278. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(74)80061-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee Y. C., Samson F. E., Jr, Houston L. L., Himes R. H. The in vitro polymerization of tubulin from beef brain. J Neurobiol. 1974;5(4):317–330. doi: 10.1002/neu.480050404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Malawista S. E., Sato H., Bensch K. G. Vinblastine and griseofulvin reversibly disrupt the living mitotic spindle. Science. 1968 May 17;160(3829):770–772. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3829.770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Olmsted J. B., Marcum J. M., Johnson K. A., Allen C., Borisy G. G. Microtuble assembly: some possible regulatory mechanisms. J Supramol Struct. 1974;2(2-4):429–450. doi: 10.1002/jss.400020230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Raff R. A., Greenhouse G., Gross K. W., Gross P. R. Synthesis and storage of microtubule proteins by sea urchin embryos. J Cell Biol. 1971 Aug;50(2):516–527. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.2.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rebhun L. I., Mellon M., Jemiolo D., Nath J., Ivy N. Regulation of size and birefringence of the in vivo mitotic apparatus. J Supramol Struct. 1974;2(2-4):466–485. doi: 10.1002/jss.400020232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rebhun L. I., Sander G. Ultrastructure and birefringence of the isolated mitotic apparatus of marine eggs. J Cell Biol. 1967 Sep;34(3):859–883. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.3.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. STEVENS C. L., LAUFFER M. A. POLYMERIZATION-DEPOLYMERIZATION OF TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS PROTEIN. IV. THE ROLE OF WATER. Biochemistry. 1965 Jan;4:31–37. doi: 10.1021/bi00877a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Salmon E. D., Ellis G. W. A new miniature hydrostatic pressure chamber for microscopy. Strain-free optical glass windows facilitate phase-contrast and polarized-light microscopy of living cells. Optional fixture permits simultaneous control of pressure and temperature. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jun;65(3):587–602. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.3.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Salmon E. D. Pressure-induced depolymerization of spindle microtubules. I. Changes in birefringence and spindle length. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jun;65(3):603–614. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.3.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Salmon E. D. Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith C. E., Lauffer M. A. Polymerization-depolymerization of tobacco mosaic virus protein. 8. Light-scattering studies. Biochemistry. 1967 Aug;6(8):2457–2464. doi: 10.1021/bi00860a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stephens R. E. A thermodynamic analysis of mitotic spindle equilibrium at active metaphase. J Cell Biol. 1973 Apr;57(1):133–147. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. TAYLOR E. W. RELATION OF PROTEIN SYNTHESIS TO THE DIVISION CYCLE IN MAMMALIAN CELL CULTURES. J Cell Biol. 1963 Oct;19:1–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.19.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tilney L. G., Hiramoto Y., Marsland D. Studies on the microtubules in heliozoa. 3. A pressure analysis of the role of these structures in the formation and maintenance of the axopodia of Actinosphaerium nucleofilum (Barrett). J Cell Biol. 1966 Apr;29(1):77–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.29.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weisenberg R. C. Changes in the organization of tubulin during meiosis in the eggs of the surf clam, Spisula solidissima. J Cell Biol. 1972 Aug;54(2):266–278. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.2.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES