Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 Oct 1;67(1):105–117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.1.105

Aster formation in eggs of Xenopus laevis. Induction by isolated basal bodies

PMCID: PMC2109591  PMID: 1236852

Abstract

We have assayed various materials for their ability to induce aster formation by microinjection into unfertilized eggs of Xenopus laevis. We have found that purified basal bodies from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Tetrahymena pyriformis induce the formation of asters and irregular cleavage furrows within 1 h after injection. Other microtubule structures such as flagella, flagellar axonemes, cilia, and brain microtubules are completely ineffective at inducing asters or cleavage furrows in unfertilized eggs. When known amounts of sonicated Tetrahymena and Chlamydomonas preparations are injected into unfertilized eggs, 50% of the injected eggs show a furrowing response at approximately 3 cell equvalents for Chlamydomonas and 0.1 cell equivalent for Tetrahymena. These results are close to those expected if basal bodies were the effective astral-inducing agent in these cells. Other materials effective at inducing asters in unfertilized eggs, such as crude brain nuclei, sperm, and a particulate fraction from brain known to induce parthenogenesis in eggs of Rana pipiens, probably contain centrioles as the effective agent. Our experiments provide the first functional assay to indicate that centrioles play an active role in aster initiation. None of the injected materials effective in unfertilized eggs produced any observable response in fully grown oocytes. Oocytes and eggs were found to have equal tubulin pools as judged by colchicine-binding activity. Therefore, the inability of oocytes to form asters cannot be due to a lack of an organizing center or to a lack of tubulin. Experiments in which D2O was found to stimulate aster-like fibrous areas in eggs but not oocytes suggest that the inability of oocytes to form asters may be due to an inability of tubulin in oocytes to assemble.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson R. G., Brenner R. M. The formation of basal bodies (centrioles) in the Rhesus monkey oviduct. J Cell Biol. 1971 Jul;50(1):10–34. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARTH L. G., BARTH L. J. Differentiation of cells of the Rana pipiens gastrula in unconditioned medium. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1959 Jun;7:210–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Colchicine binding to sea urchin eggs and the mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):535–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser L. R. Physico-chemical properties of an agent that induces parthenogenesis in Rana pipiens eggs. J Exp Zool. 1971 Jun;177(2):153–172. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401770204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gurdon J. B. Changes in somatic cell nuclei inserted into growing and maturing amphibian oocytes. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1968 Nov;20(3):401–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heidemann S. R., Townsend J., Tompkins R. Synthesis of soluble protein in oocytes of Xenopus laevis. J Exp Zool. 1975 Feb;191(2):253–260. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401910211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kirschner M. W., Williams R. C., Weingarten M., Gerhart J. C. Microtubules from mammalian brain: some properties of their depolymerization products and a proposed mechanism of assembly and disassembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1159–1163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Olmsted J. B., Borisy G. G. Microtubules. Annu Rev Biochem. 1973;42:507–540. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.42.070173.002451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rappaport R. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1971;31:169–213. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60059-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rubin R. W., Cunningham W. P. Partial purification and phosphotungstate solubilization of basal bodies and kinetodesmal fibers from Tetrahymena pyriformis. J Cell Biol. 1973 Jun;57(3):601–612. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.3.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Satir B., Rosenbaum J. L. The isolation and identification of kinetosome-rich fractions from Tetrahymena pyriformis. J Protozool. 1965 Aug;12(3):397–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1965.tb03232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shelanski M. L., Gaskin F., Cantor C. R. Microtubule assembly in the absence of added nucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):765–768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Snell W. J., Dentler W. L., Haimo L. T., Binder L. I., Rosenbaum J. L. Assembly of chick brain tubulin onto isolated basal bodies of Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Science. 1974 Jul 26;185(4148):357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4148.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sueoka N., Chiang K. S., Kates J. R. Deoxyribonucleic acid replication in meiosis of Chlamydomonas reinhardi. I. Isotopic transfer experiments with a strain producing eight zoospores. J Mol Biol. 1967 Apr 14;25(1):47–66. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90278-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Assel S., Brachet J. Formation de cytasters dans les oeufs de batraciens sous l'action de l'eau lourde. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1966 Apr;15(2):143–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WATSON M. R., HOPKINS J. M. Isolated cilia from Tetrahymena pyriformis. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Nov;28:280–295. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90284-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weisenberg R. C., Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The colchicine-binding protein of mammalian brain and its relation to microtubules. Biochemistry. 1968 Dec;7(12):4466–4479. doi: 10.1021/bi00852a043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weisenberg R. C. Microtubule formation in vitro in solutions containing low calcium concentrations. Science. 1972 Sep 22;177(4054):1104–1105. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4054.1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weisenberg R. C., Rosenfeld A. C. In vitro polymerization of microtubules into asters and spindles in homogenates of surf clam eggs. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jan;64(1):146–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.1.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilson L. Properties of colchicine binding protein from chick embryo brain. Interactions with vinca alkaloids and podophyllotoxin. Biochemistry. 1970 Dec 8;9(25):4999–5007. doi: 10.1021/bi00827a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Witman G. B., Carlson K., Berliner J., Rosenbaum J. L. Chlamydomonas flagella. I. Isolation and electrophoretic analysis of microtubules, matrix, membranes, and mastigonemes. J Cell Biol. 1972 Sep;54(3):507–539. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.3.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES