Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1976 Mar 1;68(3):688–704. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.3.688

Functional significance of the variations in the geometrical organization of tight junction networks

PMCID: PMC2109645  PMID: 1030707

Abstract

Using freeze-fracture techniques, we have examined the morpholog of tight junction networks found along the length of the alimentary tract of Xenopus laevis before and after metamorphosis. We have developed the hypothesis, based on these observations, that the geometrical organization of the network determined by the stress-induced shape changes normally experienced by the cells linked by the network. Consistent with this theory, tight junctions can be classified into two distinct types of network organization which differ in their response normal and experimentally induced stress conditions: (a) loosely interconnected networks which can stretch or compress extensively under tension, thereby adapting to stress changes in the tissue; and (b) evenly cross-linked networks which retain their basic morphology under normal stress conditions. The absorptive cells of the large intestine as well as the mucous cells of the gastrointestine or stomach are sealed by the first, flexible type of tight junction. The second type of junctional organization, the evenly cross-connected network, is found between absorptive cells of the small intestine and ciliated cells of the esophagus, and reflects in its constant morphology the relative stability of the apical region of both of these cell types. Networks intermediate between these two types arise when a cell which would normally form a lossely interconnected network borders a cell which tends to form a more evenly cross-linked network, as is found in the esophagus where ciliated and goblet cells adjoin. Despite the change in the animal's diet during metamorphosis from herbivorous to carnivorous, the basic gemetrical organization of the networks associated with each tissue of the alimentary tract remains the same.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonneville M. A., Weinstock M. Brush border development in the intestinal absorptive cells of Xenopus during metamorphosis. J Cell Biol. 1970 Jan;44(1):151–171. doi: 10.1083/jcb.44.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branton D., Bullivant S., Gilula N. B., Karnovsky M. J., Moor H., Mühlethaler K., Northcote D. H., Packer L., Satir B., Satir P. Freeze-etching nomenclature. Science. 1975 Oct 3;190(4209):54–56. doi: 10.1126/science.1166299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chalcroft J. P., Bullivant S. An interpretation of liver cell membrane and junction structure based on observation of freeze-fracture replicas of both sides of the fracture. J Cell Biol. 1970 Oct;47(1):49–60. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Claude P., Goodenough D. A. Fracture faces of zonulae occludentes from "tight" and "leaky" epithelia. J Cell Biol. 1973 Aug;58(2):390–400. doi: 10.1083/jcb.58.2.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FARQUHAR M. G., PALADE G. E. Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:375–412. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fox H., Bailey E., Mahoney R. Aspects of the ultrastructure of the alimentary canal and respiratory ducts in Xenopus laevis larvae. J Morphol. 1972 Dec;138(4):387–405. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051380402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fox H., Mahoney R., Bailey E. Aspects of the ultrastructure of the alimentary canal and associated glands of the Xenopus laevis larva. Arch Biol (Liege) 1970;81(1):21–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Friend D. S., Gilula N. B. Variations in tight and gap junctions in mammalian tissues. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jun;53(3):758–776. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.3.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frömter E., Diamond J. Route of passive ion permeation in epithelia. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jan 5;235(53):9–13. doi: 10.1038/newbio235009a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodenough D. A., Revel J. P. A fine structural analysis of intercellular junctions in the mouse liver. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):272–290. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. NORRIS J. L. The normal histology of the esophageal and gastric mucosae of the frog. Rana pipiens. J Exp Zool. 1959 Jun;141:155–173. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401410108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pitelka D. R., Hamamoto S. T., Duafala J. G., Nemanic M. K. Cell contacts in the mouse mammary gland. I. Normal gland in postnatal development and the secretory cycle. J Cell Biol. 1973 Mar;56(3):797–818. doi: 10.1083/jcb.56.3.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Singer S. J., Nicolson G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Staehelin L. A. Further observations on the fine structure of freeze-cleaved tight junctions. J Cell Sci. 1973 Nov;13(3):763–786. doi: 10.1242/jcs.13.3.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Staehelin L. A. Structure and function of intercellular junctions. Int Rev Cytol. 1974;39:191–283. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60940-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES