Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1976 Mar 1;68(3):620–628. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.3.620

Control of chromosome behavior in amphibian oocytes. II. The effect of inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis on the induction of chromosome condensation in transplanted brain nuclei by oocyte cytoplasm

PMCID: PMC2109660  PMID: 1088285

Abstract

We studied the effects of actinomycin D, alpha-amanitin, puromycin, and cycloheximide on the cytoplasmic activity of maturing Rana pipiens oocytes that induces chromosome condensation in transplanted brain nuclei. Treatment of oocytes with each inhibitor suppressed the chromosome condensation induced by metaphase oocytes to varying degrees depending upon the dose of inhibitor, despite the fact that untreated metaphase I oocytes already possessed chromosome condensation activity (CCA). Treatment of brain nuclei before injection completely suppressed condensation at all doses used. Chromosome condensation induced by metaphase II oocyte cytoplasm, however, was insensitive to all the inhibitors, even when the brain nuclei were pretreated. Oocytes treated with alpha-amanitin throughout maturation induced chromosome condensation when tested at metaphase II. Removal of the oocyte chromosomes after the germinal vesicle (GV) broke down did not prevent the development of CCA, whereas removal of the entire GV before initiation of maturation deprived oocytes of CCA. The results suggest that metaphase I oocyte cytoplasm stimulates synthesis of brain nuclear RNAs that are translated into proteins necessary for chromosome condensation, whereas metaphase II oocytes possess all the factors for chromosome condensation. In both cases, GV nucleoplasm appears indispensable for the development of CCA, whereas immediate activity of the oocyte genome is not required.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRACHET J., DENIS H., DEVITRY F. THE EFFECTS OF ACTINOMYCIN D AND PUROMYCIN ON MORPHOGENESIS IN AMPHIBIAN EGGS AND ACETABULARIA MEDITERRANEA. Dev Biol. 1964 Jun;9:398–434. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(64)90033-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRACHET J., DENIS H. Effects of actinomycin D on morphogenesis. Nature. 1963 Apr 13;198:205–206. doi: 10.1038/198205a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brachet J. Effects of actinomycin, puromycin and cycloheximide upon the maturation of amphibian ovocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1967 Oct;48(1):233–236. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(67)90312-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucci S., Nardi I., Mancino G., Fiume L. Incorporation of tritiated uridine in nuclei of Triturus oocytes treated with alpha-amanitin. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Dec;69(2):462–465. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DETTLAFF T. A., NIKITINA L. A., STROEVA O. G. THE R OLE OF THE GERMINAL VESICLE IN OOECYTE MATURATION IN ANURANS AS REVEALED BY THE REMOVAL AND TRANSPLANTATION OF NUCLEI. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1964 Dec;12:851–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ecker R. E., Smith L. D. Protein synthesis in amphibian oocytes and early embryos. Dev Biol. 1968 Sep;18(3):232–249. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(68)90034-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ecker R. E., Smith L. D. The nature and fate of Rana pipiens proteins synthesized during maturation and early cleavage. Dev Biol. 1971 Apr;24(4):559–576. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(71)90064-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gurdon J. B. Changes in somatic cell nuclei inserted into growing and maturing amphibian oocytes. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1968 Nov;20(3):401–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gurdon J. B. On the origin and persistence of a cytoplasmic state inducing nuclear DNA synthesis in frogs' eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Aug;58(2):545–552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.2.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson R. T., Rao P. N. Mammalian cell fusion: induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase nuclei. Nature. 1970 May 23;226(5247):717–722. doi: 10.1038/226717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Masui Y. Relative roles of the pituitary, follicle cells, and progesterone in the induction of oocyte maturation in Rana pipiens. J Exp Zool. 1967 Dec;166(3):365–375. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401660309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith L. D., Ecker R. E. Regulatory processes in the maturation and early cleavage of amphibian eggs. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1970;5:1–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith L. D., Ecker R. E. Role of the oocyte nucleus in physiological maturation in Rana pipiens. Dev Biol. 1969 Mar;19(3):281–309. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(69)90065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tocchini-Valentini G. P., Crippa M. Ribosomal RNA synthesis and RNA polymerase. Nature. 1970 Dec 5;228(5275):993–995. doi: 10.1038/228993a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Waring M. Variation of the supercoils in closed circular DNA by binding of antibiotics and drugs: evidence for molecular models involving intercalation. J Mol Biol. 1970 Dec 14;54(2):247–279. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90429-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ziegler D., Masui Y. Control of chromosome behavior in amphibian oocytes. I. The activity of maturing oocytes inducing chromosome condensation in transplanted brain nuclei. Dev Biol. 1973 Dec;35(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES