Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1976 Nov 1;71(2):370–382. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.2.370

A quantitative description of the extension and retraction of surface protrusions in spreading 3T3 mouse fibroblasts

PMCID: PMC2109771  PMID: 11221

Abstract

We suggest a method of quantitating the motile actions of surface protrusions in spreading animal cells in culture. Its basis is the determination of the percentage of freshly plated cells which produce particle-free areas around them on a gold particle-coated glass cover slip within 50 min. Studying 3T3 cells with this assay, we found that the presence of Na+, K+, Cl-, and Mg++ or Ca++ in a neutral or slightly alkaline phosphate or bicarbonate buffered solution is sufficient to support the optimal particle removal by the cells for at least 50 min. Two metabolic inhibitors, 2,4-dinitrophenol and Na-azide, inhibit the particle removal. If D-glucose is added along with the inhibitors, particle removal can be restored, whereas the addition of three glucose analogues which are generally believed to be nonmetabolizable cannot restore the activity. Serum is not required for the mechanism(s) of the motile actions of surface protrusions in spreading 3T3 cells. However, it contains components which can neutralize the inhibitory actions of bovine serum albumin and several amino acids, particularly L-cystine or L-cystein and L-methionine. Furthermore, serum codetermines which of the major surface extension, filopodia, lamellipodia, or lobopodia, is predominantly active. We found three distinct classes of extracellular conditions under which the active surface projections are predominantly either lamellipodia, (sheetlike projections), lobopodia (blebs), or filopodia (microspikes). The quantitated dependencies on temperature, pH and the inhibition by cytochalasin B or the particle removal are very similar in all three cases. Preventing the cells from anchoring themselves for 15-20 min before plating in serum-free medium seems to stimulate particle removal threefold.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jun;60(3):437–444. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90537-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albrecht-Buehler G. Filopodia of spreading 3T3 cells. Do they have a substrate-exploring function? J Cell Biol. 1976 May;69(2):275–286. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albrecht-Bühler G., Solomon F. Properties of particle movement in the plasma membrane of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Apr;85(2):225–233. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90121-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown S., Teplitz M., Revel J. P. Interaction of mycoplasmas with cell cultures, as visualized by electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Feb;71(2):464–468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.2.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buckley I. K. Subcellular motility: a correlated light and electron microscopic study using cultured cells. Tissue Cell. 1974;6(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(74)90019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buckley I. K. Three dimensional fine structure of cultured cells: possible implications for subcellular motility. Tissue Cell. 1975;7(1):51–72. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(75)80007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bürk R. R. A factor from a transformed cell line that affects cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Feb;70(2):369–372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cone R. A. Rotational diffusion of rhodopsin in the visual receptor membrane. Nat New Biol. 1972 Mar 15;236(63):39–43. doi: 10.1038/newbio236039a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dipasquale A. Locomotion of epithelial cells. Factors involved in extension of the leading edge. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Oct 15;95(2):425–439. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90568-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dipasquale A. Locomotory activity of epithelial cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Aug;94(1):191–215. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90545-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Edidin M., Weiss A. Antigen cap formation in cultured fibroblasts: a reflection of membrane fluidity and of cell motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2456–2459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Godman G. C., Miranda A. F., Deitch A. D., Tanenbaum S. W. Action of cytochalasin D on cells of established lines. III. Zeiosis and movements at the cell surface. J Cell Biol. 1975 Mar;64(3):644–667. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.3.644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris A., Dunn G. Centripetal transport of attached particles on both surfaces of moving fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Aug;73(2):519–523. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90084-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hubbell W. L., McConnell H. M. Molecular motion in spin-labeled phospholipids and membranes. J Am Chem Soc. 1971 Jan 27;93(2):314–326. doi: 10.1021/ja00731a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Revel J. P., Hoch P., Ho D. Adhesion of culture cells to their substratum. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Mar 15;84(1):207–218. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90398-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Robinson J. D., Birdsall N. J., Lee A. G., Metcalfe J. C. 13 C and 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements of the lipids of sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes. Biochemistry. 1972 Jul 18;11(15):2903–2909. doi: 10.1021/bi00765a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SKOU J. C. The influence of some cations on an adenosine triphosphatase from peripheral nerves. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Feb;23(2):394–401. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. TODARO G. J., GREEN H. Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:299–313. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor A. C. Microtubules in the microspikes and cortical cytoplasm of isolated cells. J Cell Biol. 1966 Feb;28(2):155–168. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.2.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trelstad R. L., Hay E. D., Revel J. D. Cell contact during early morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1967 Jul;16(1):78–106. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Trinkaus J. P., Lentz T. L. Surface specializations of Fundulus cells and their relation to cell movements during gastrulation. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jan;32(1):139–153. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES