Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1977 May 1;73(2):400–418. doi: 10.1083/jcb.73.2.400

Spatial relationship of photosystem I, photosystem II, and the light- harvesting complex in chloroplast membranes

PMCID: PMC2109912  PMID: 870501

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated (Armond, P. A., C. J. Arntzen, J.-M. Briantais, and C. Vernotte. 1976. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 175:54-63; and Davis, D. J., P. A. Armond, E. L. Gross, and C. J. Arntzen. 1976. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 175:64-70) that pea seedlings which were exposed to intermittent illumination contained incompletely developed chloroplasts. These plastids were photosynthetically competent, but did not contain grana. We now demonstrate that the incompletely developed plastids have a smaller photosynthetic unit size; this is primarily due to the absence of a major light-harvesting pigment-protein complex which is present in the mature membranes. Upon exposure of intermittent- light seedlings to continuous white light for periods up to 48 h, a ligh-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex was inserted into the chloroplast membrane with a concomitant appearance of grana stacks and an increase in photosynthetic unit size. Plastid membranes from plants grown under intermediate light were examined by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. The membrane particles on both the outer (PF) and inner (EF) leaflets of the thylakoid membrane were found to be randomly distributed. The particle density of the PF fracture face was approx. four times that of the EF fracture face. While only small changes in particle density were observed during the greening process under continuous light, major changes in particle size were noted, particularly in the EF particles of stacked regions (EFs) of the chloroplast membrane. Both the changes in particle size and an observed aggregation of the EF particles into the newly stacked regions of the membrane were correlated with the insertion of light-harvesting pigment- protein into the membrane. Evidence is presented for identification of the EF particles as the morphological equivalent of a "complete" photosystem II complex, consisting of a phosochemically active "core" complex surrounded by discrete aggregates of the light-harvesting pigment protein. A model demonstrating the spatial relationships of photosystem I, photosystem II, and the light-harvesting complex in the chloroplast membrane is presented.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. M., Boardman N. K. Fractionation of the photochemical systems of photosynthesis. I. Chlorophyll contents and photochemical activities of particles isolated from spinach chloroplasts. Bibl Laeger. 1966 Mar 14;112(3):403–421. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(66)90244-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson J. M., Levine R. P. The relationship between chlorophyll-protein complexes and chloroplast membrane polypeptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Jul 25;357(1):118–126. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(74)90117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armond P. A., Arntzen C. J., Briantais J. M., Vernotte C. Differentiation of chloroplast lamellae. Light harvesting efficiency and grana development. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1976 Jul;175(1):54–63. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(76)90484-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arntzen C. J., Dilley R. A., Peters G. A., Shaw E. R. Photochemical activity and structural studies of photosystems derived from chloroplast grana and stroma lamellae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Jan 21;256(1):85–107. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(72)90165-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Branton D., Bullivant S., Gilula N. B., Karnovsky M. J., Moor H., Mühlethaler K., Northcote D. H., Packer L., Satir B., Satir P. Freeze-etching nomenclature. Science. 1975 Oct 3;190(4209):54–56. doi: 10.1126/science.1166299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Branton D. Fracture faces of frozen membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 May;55(5):1048–1056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.5.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Branton D., Park R. B. Subunits in chloroplast lamellae. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Aug;19(3):283–303. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80222-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis D. J., Armond P. A., Gross E. L., Arntzen C. J. Differentiation of chloroplast lamellae. Onset of cation regulation of excitation energy distribution. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1976 Jul;175(1):64–70. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(76)90485-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodenough U. W., Staehelin L. A. Structural differentiation of stacked and unstacked chloroplast membranes. Freeze-etch electron microscopy of wild-type and mutant strains of Chlamydomonas. J Cell Biol. 1971 Mar;48(3):594–619. doi: 10.1083/jcb.48.3.594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoober J. K. Sites of synthesis of chloroplast membrane polypeptides in Chlamydomonas reinhardi y-1. J Biol Chem. 1970 Sep 10;245(17):4327–4334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keck R. W., Dilley R. A. Chloroplast composition and structure differences in a soybean mutant. Plant Physiol. 1970 Nov;46(5):692–698. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.5.692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Malkin S., Kok B. Fluorescence induction studies in isolated chloroplasts. I. Number of components involved in the reaction and quantum yields. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Nov 8;126(3):413–432. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(66)90001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller K. R., Staehelin L. A. Fine structure of the chloroplast membranes of Euglena gracilis as revealed by freeze-cleaving and deep-etching techniques. Protoplasma. 1973;77(1):55–78. doi: 10.1007/BF01287292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ojakian G. K., Satir P. Particle movements in chloroplast membranes: quantitative measurements of membrane fluidity by the freeze-fracture technique. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):2052–2056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.2052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ophir I., Ben-Shaul Y. Structural organization of developing chloroplasts in Euglena. Protoplasma. 1974;80(1):109–127. doi: 10.1007/BF01666354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pinto da Silva P., Branton D. Membrane splitting in freeze-ethching. Covalently bound ferritin as a membrane marker. J Cell Biol. 1970 Jun;45(3):598–605. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.3.598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sane P. V., Goodchild D. J., Park R. B. Characterization of chloroplast photosystems 1 and 2 separated by a non-detergent method. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970 Aug 4;216(1):162–178. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(70)90168-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Staehelin L. A. Chloroplast membrane structure. Intramembranous particles of different sizes make contact in stacked membrane regions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Oct 10;408(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90153-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Staehelin L. A. Reversible particle movements associated with unstacking and restacking of chloroplast membranes in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1976 Oct;71(1):136–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.1.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vernon L. P., Ke B., Katoh S., San Pietro A., Shaw E. R. Properties of subchloroplast particles prepared by the action of digitonin, triton X-100, and sonication. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1966;19:102–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wessels J. S., van Alphen-Van Waveren, Voorn G. Isolation and properties of particles containing the reaction center complex of photosystem II from spinach chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Apr 5;292(3):741–752. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(73)90021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES