Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1977 Nov 1;75(2):507–527. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.2.507

Turnover of rod photoreceptor outer segments. II. Membrane addition and loss in relationship to light

PMCID: PMC2109927  PMID: 264121

Abstract

The rate of disk addition to rod outer segments (ROS) varies widely in Xenopus laevis tadpoles kept in cyclic light (12L:12D). When measured as radioactive band (3H-band) displacement during the 2nd day after injection of [3H]leucine, 75% of the daily increment of displacement occurred during the first 8 h of light. During the same interval, the number of open disks at the ROS base increased more than threefold. During the last 8 h of darkness, 3H-band displacement was undetectable and the number of open disks was reduced. These observations suggest the possibility that disk addition may occur discontinuously. During the 3rd and 4th days after injection of [3H]leucine, maximal displacement of the 3H-band occurred later in the day than on the 2nd day, its movement no longer corresponding to the increase in open disks. This delay in 3H-band displacement may reflect a time delay as a result of propagation of compressive stress in an elastic ROS system. Maximal disk loss from ROS as reflected in counts of phagosomes in the pigment epithelium occurred within 1 h of light exposure, and phagosome counts remained high for 4 h before declining to a low level in darkness. Modified lighting regimes affected the daily rhythms of shedding and disk addition differently, suggesting that control mechanisms for the two processes are not directly coupled. During 3 days in darkness, disk addition was reduced 50% compared to controls (12L:12D), whereas shedding was reduced by about 40%. Although reduced in level, shedding occurred as a free-running circadian rhythm. There was no evidence of rhythmicity of disk addition in darkness. In constant light, the rate of disk addition was not different from controls, but shedding was reduced by about 80% after the 1st day. This resulted in a 21% increase in ROS length. Among animals kept on a 2.5L:21.5D cycle, the rate of disk addition was reduced by 40% while shedding was maintained near control levels, resulting in a slight decrease in ROS length. These observations indicate that normal shedding requires alternating light and darkness, and that the daily rhythm of disk addition is due primarily to daily stimulation by light.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAIRATI A., Jr, ORZALESI N. THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE PIGMENT EPITHELIUM AND OF THE PHOTORECEPTOR-PIGMENT EPITHELIUM JUNCTION IN THE HUMAN RETINA. J Ultrastruct Res. 1963 Dec;41:484–496. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(63)80080-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker P. C., Quay W. B., Axelrod J. Development of hydroxyindole-O-methyl transferase activity in eye and brain of the amphibian, Xenopus laevis. Life Sci. 1965 Oct;4(20):1981–1987. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(65)90055-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basinger S., Bok D., Hall M. Rhodopsin in the rod outer segment plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):29–42. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basinger S., Hoffman R., Matthes M. Photoreceptor shedding is initiated by light in the frog retina. Science. 1976 Dec 3;194(4269):1074–1076. doi: 10.1126/science.1086510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Besharse J. C., Hollyfield J. G., Rayborn M. E. Photoreceptor outer segments: accelerated membrane renewal in rods after exposure to light. Science. 1977 Apr 29;196(4289):536–538. doi: 10.1126/science.300504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Besharse J. C., Hollyfield J. G. Renewal of normal and degenerating photoreceptor outer segments in the Ozark cave salamander. J Exp Zool. 1976 Dec;198(3):287–302. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401980302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blaurock A. E., Wilkins M. H. Structure of frog photoreceptor membranes. Nature. 1969 Aug 30;223(5209):906–909. doi: 10.1038/223906a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Borovjagin V. L., Ivanina T. A. An ultrastructural study of the frog retinal rod photreceptor membranes phagocyted by pigment epithelium cells after aldehyde fixations and organic solvents treatments. Vision Res. 1973 Apr;13(4):753–757. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90039-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bownds D., Gordon-Walker A., Gaide-Huguenin A. C., Robinson W. Characterization and analysis of frog photoreceptor membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Sep;58(3):225–237. doi: 10.1085/jgp.58.3.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bridges C. D., Hollyfield J. G., Besharse J. C., Rayborn M. E. Visual pigment loss after light-induced shedding of rod outer segments. Exp Eye Res. 1976 Dec;23(6):637–641. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(76)90222-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen A. I. New evidence supporting the linkage to extracellular space of outer segment saccules of frog cones but not rods. J Cell Biol. 1968 May;37(2):424–444. doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.2.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DROZ B., RAMBOURG A., OLIVIER L. ACTION DE LA LUMI'ERE SUR L'INCORPORATION DE M'ETHIONINE 35S AU NIVEAU DE LA R'ETINE DE LA SOURIS. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1963;157:2136–2140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hagins W. A. The visual process: Excitatory mechanisms in the primary receptor cells. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1972;1:131–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.01.060172.001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall M. O., Bok D., Bacharach A. D. Visual pigment renewal in the mature frog retina. Science. 1968 Aug 23;161(3843):787–789. doi: 10.1126/science.161.3843.787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall M. O., Bok D. Incorporation of (3H)vitamin A into rhodopsin in light- and dark-adapted frogs. Exp Eye Res. 1974 Jan;18(1):105–117. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(74)90048-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heller J. Structure of visual pigments. I. Purification, molecular weight, and composition of bovine visual pigment500. Biochemistry. 1968 Aug;7(8):2906–2913. doi: 10.1021/bi00848a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ishikawa T., Yamada E. The degradation of the photoreceptor outer segment within the pigment epithelial cell of rat retina. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 1970;19(1):85–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jan L. Y., Revel J. P. Ultrastructural localization of rhodopsin in the vertebrate retina. J Cell Biol. 1974 Aug;62(2):257–273. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. LaVail M. M. Rod outer segment disk shedding in rat retina: relationship to cyclic lighting. Science. 1976 Dec 3;194(4269):1071–1074. doi: 10.1126/science.982063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Laties A. M., Bok D., Liebman P. Procion yellow: a marker dye for outer segment disc patency and for rod renewal. Exp Eye Res. 1976 Aug;23(2):139–148. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(76)90197-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liebman P. A., Entine G. Lateral diffusion of visual pigment in photorecptor disk membranes. Science. 1974 Aug 2;185(4149):457–459. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4149.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. NILSSON S. E. RECEPTOR CELL OUTER SEGMENT DEVELOPMENT AND ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE DISK MEMBRANES IN THE RETINA OF THE TADPOLE (RANA PIPIENS). J Ultrastruct Res. 1964 Dec;11:581–602. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(64)80084-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Papermaster D. S., Converse C. A., Zorn M. Biosynthetic and immunochemical characterization of large protein in frog and cattle rod outer segment membranes. Exp Eye Res. 1976 Aug;23(2):105–115. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(76)90194-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Poo M. M., Cone R. A. Lateral diffusion of phodopsin in Necturus rods. Exp Eye Res. 1973 Dec 24;17(6):503–510. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(73)90079-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spitznas M., Hogan M. J. Outer segments of photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium. Interrelationship in the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1970 Dec;84(6):810–819. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1970.00990040812022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wald G. Molecular basis of visual excitation. Science. 1968 Oct 11;162(3850):230–239. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3850.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Worthington C. R. Structure of photoreceptor membranes. Fed Proc. 1971 Jan-Feb;30(1):57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Young R. W., Bok D. Participation of the retinal pigment epithelium in the rod outer segment renewal process. J Cell Biol. 1969 Aug;42(2):392–403. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.2.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Young R. W., Droz B. The renewal of protein in retinal rods and cones. J Cell Biol. 1968 Oct;39(1):169–184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.1.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Young R. W. The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments. J Cell Biol. 1967 Apr;33(1):61–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Young R. W. The renewal of rod and cone outer segments in the rhesus monkey. J Cell Biol. 1971 May 1;49(2):303–318. doi: 10.1083/jcb.49.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Young R. W. Visual cells and the concept of renewal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1976 Sep;15(9):700–725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES