Abstract
Electrophysiological studies of low-resistance junctions between Novikoff hepatoma cells grown in suspension cultures were carried out and correlated with gap-junctional areas per inferface determined by freeze-fracture. The mean coupling coefficient between isolated cell pairs was 0.773 +/- 0.025 (SEM) in 67G medium and 0.653 +/- 0.028 in M67 medium; the respective means for the central pairs of four-cell chains were 0.714 +/- 0.034 and 0.595 +/- 0.026. Mean estimates of nonjunctional resistances for cell pairs were 3.0 +/- 0.32 x 10(7) ohm (67G) and 2.01 +/- 0.01 x 10(7) ohm (M67), and the respective estimates for specific nonjunctional resistances were 158.6 +/- 8.1 ohm-cm2 (67G) and 133.0 +/- 812 ohm-cm2 (M67). Mean estimates of junctional conductances were 0.409 +/- 0.058 x 10(-6) mho (67G) and 0.211 +/- 0.018 x 10(-6) mho (M67) for pairs and 0.291 +/- 0.063 x 10(-6) mho (67G) and 0.212 +/- 0.04 mho (M67) for four-cell chains. The mean area of gap junction per interface for separate cell populations was 0.187 +/- 0.049 micron 2 and 0.269 +/- 0.054 micron 2 for cells fixed in loose pellets and in suspension, respectively. When compared with the mean junctional conductance, these values gave specific junctional conductance estimates of 1.13 x 10(2) mho/cm2 and 0.78 x 10(2) mho/cm2, respectively. These values are higher than most previous estimates, but are consistent with the hypothesis that gap-junctional particles contain central hydrophilic channels, about 2 nm in diameter, which have cytoplasmic resistivity.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bennett M. V. Physiology of electrotonic junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):509–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennett M. V., Spira M. E., Pappas G. D. Properties of electrotonic junctions between embryonic cells of Fundulus. Dev Biol. 1972 Dec;29(4):419–435. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90082-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FURSHPAN E. J., POTTER D. D. Transmission at the giant motor synapses of the crayfish. J Physiol. 1959 Mar 3;145(2):289–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hülser D. F., Webb D. J. Relation between ionic coupling and morphology of established cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Jul;80(1):210–222. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90291-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito S., Sato E., Loewenstein W. R. Studies on the formation of a permeable cell membrane junction. II. Evolving junctional conductance and junctional insulation. J Membr Biol. 1974;19(4):339–355. doi: 10.1007/BF01869985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson R. G., Sheridan J. D. Junctions between cancer cells in culture: ultrastructure and permeability. Science. 1971 Nov 12;174(4010):717–719. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4010.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson R., Hammer M., Sheridan J., Revel J. P. Gap junction formation between reaggregated Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Nov;71(11):4536–4540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.11.4536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loewenstein W. R., Nakas M., Socolar S. J. Junctional membrane uncoupling. Permeability transformations at a cell membrane junction. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Aug;50(7):1865–1891. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.7.1865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Lague P., Dalen H., Rubin H., Tobias C. Electrical coupling: low resistance junctions between mitotic and interphase fibroblasts in tissue culture. Science. 1970 Oct 23;170(3956):464–466. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3956.464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Payton B. W., Bennett M. V., Pappas G. D. Permeability and structure of junctional membranes at an electrotonic synapse. Science. 1969 Dec 26;166(3913):1641–1643. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3913.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Payton B. W., Bennett M. V., Pappas G. D. Temperature-dependence of resistance at an electrotonic synapse. Science. 1969 Aug 8;165(3893):594–597. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3893.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plagemann P. G., Swim H. E. Replication of mengovirus. I. Effect on synthesis of macromolecules by host cell. J Bacteriol. 1966 Jun;91(6):2317–2326. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.6.2317-2326.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Potter D. D., Furshpan E. J., Lennox E. S. Connections between cells of the developing squid as revealed by electrophysiological methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Feb;55(2):328–336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.2.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Revel J. P., Yee A. G., Hudspeth A. J. Gap junctions between electrotonically coupled cells in tissue culture and in brown fat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Dec;68(12):2924–2927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.12.2924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slack C., Warner A. E. Properties of surface and junctional membranes of embryonic cells isolated from blastula stages of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;248(1):97–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Socolar S. J. Cell coupling in epithella. Exp Eye Res. 1973 May 24;15(6):693–698. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(73)90003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Socolar S. J. The coupling coefficient as an index of junctional conductance. J Membr Biol. 1977 Jun 3;34(1):29–37. doi: 10.1007/BF01870291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spira A. W. The nexus in the intercalated disc of the canine heart: quantitative data for an estimation of its resistance. J Ultrastruct Res. 1971 Mar;34(5):409–425. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(71)80055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Subak-Sharpe H., Bürk R. R., Pitts J. D. Metabolic co-operation between biochemically marked mammalian cells in tissue culture. J Cell Sci. 1969 Mar;4(2):353–367. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.2.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]